Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 FREDDY FLORIAN v. SHANTAY D. JOHNSON -- rank: 736

... not negligent in performing their duties, and as such, under N.J.S.A. 59:2-2, there was no negligence on the part of the public ...

docket:	a1010-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45166

32 MIRIAM L. CHICAS v. TOWN OF KEARNY -- rank: 732

... the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.' N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a); see also Tice v. Cramer, 133 N.J. 347 ... A. 59:4-2 is inapplicable. Rather, in accord with N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a), defendants were subject to liability under the normal negligence ...

docket:	a1248-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43077

33 CORRIE A. ALLEN v. PATRICK B. FLYNN -- rank: 729

... to Waterview. Liberty Surplus , supra , 189 N.J. at 445. N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a) provides that a public entity is "liable for injury ...

docket:	a6254-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39725

34 Deborah Anderson v. TARANCE Bryant -- rank: 727

... The TCA "incorporat[es] the doctrine of respondeat superior " in N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a). Rochinsky v. State, Dep't of Transp. , 110 N.J. 399 , 409 (1988); see also N.J.S.A. 59:2-2, official comment. "A public entity is liable for injury proximately ... the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances." N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a). Bryant was an employee of Jersey City. However, "[p ...

docket:	a5423-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53853

35 FAMOUS RIVERA v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD BLACK UNITED FUND -- rank: 725

... of a public employee within the scope of his employment." N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a). As the Court has recently said, "vicarious liability of ... of a public employee within the scope of his employment." N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a). Moreover, we agree with the motion judge that Plainfield ...

docket:	a4558-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-03
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	35200

36 JAMAL COREY HAND v. CITY OF PATERSON -- rank: 725

... s construction official was immune, so was the City. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(b) ('A public entity is not liable for an injury ...

docket:	a2891-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-12
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29143

37 ITALO GOMEZ v. CUMBERLAND USA, INC and MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY -- rank: 720

... injuries sustained due to the nature of his work. See N.J.S.A. 59:2-2. Having reviewed the arguments advanced in light of the record ... it breached that duty which resulted in his injuries. Although N.J.S.A. 59:2-2 provides for public-entity liability "for injury proximately caused by ...

docket:	a4420-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-12
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	34841

38 VICTOR N. ROCCO et al. v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC., et al. -- rank: 718

... of a dangerous condition of public property and respondeat superior . N.J.S.A. 59:2-2 which deals with liability for the acts of a public ... a public employee where the public employee is not liable. [ N.J.S.A. 59:2-2.] The definition provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:4 ... issue of fact justifying plaintiffs' claim based upon respondeat superior . N.J.S.A. 59:2-2 provides that a public entity is liable for injuries caused ...

docket:	a4354-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-04-25
status:	published
citation:	330 N.J.Super. 320
Document Size:	42343

39 OMER JACKSON, ET AL. VS. COUNTY OF HUDSON, ET AL. -- rank: 704

... omissions, the public entity employer will not be liable either. N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(b). An additional provision of the TCA limits the entity ...

docket:	a3111-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18475

40 GEORGE E. PEARSON v. BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG -- rank: 702

... affirmative defenses under the TCA. The Borough asserted immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(b) because Wood was immune under N.J.S.A ... of any law.' A-3762-20 20 turn, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(b), '[a] public entity is not liable for an injury ...

docket:	a3762-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35682

41 CHARLOTTE ROBINSON v. FRANK VIVIRITO -- rank: 699

... Home would be vicariously liable for their negligence pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:2-2. 2 Id. at 526-29. With respect to James, we ... would be imputable to their employer, [the Home]. [ Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 59:2-2).] In response to the Home's argument that ownership of ... scope of the Corcorans' employment to keep the premises safe. N.J.S.A. 59:2-2. Depending on the proofs adduced at trial, a jury could ... her estate as Robinson for the sake of convenience. 2 N.J.S.A. 59:2-2 provides as follows: a. A public entity is liable for ...

docket:	a4487-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22015

42 ANTHONY LEMMA v. PENNWOOD RACING -- rank: 697

... the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances." N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a). However, N.J.S.A. 59:2-1(b ...

docket:	a5078-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33041

43 ROMAN BUDNIK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 695

... administered the Project, thereby creating a separate liability claim under N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a), which provides that a "public entity is liable for ... alleged interpretation of the contract. The ordinary negligence standard of N.J.S.A . 59:2-2 must give way to the more stringent "palpably unreasonable" standard ...

docket:	a4629-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63516

44 ROMAN BUDNIK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 695

... administered the Project, thereby creating a separate liability claim under N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a), which provides that a "public entity is liable for ... alleged interpretation of the contract. The ordinary negligence standard of N.J.S.A . 59:2-2 must give way to the more stringent "palpably unreasonable" standard ...

docket:	a4133-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63516

45 ROMAN BUDNIK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 695

... administered the Project, thereby creating a separate liability claim under N.J.S.A. 59:2-2(a), which provides that a "public entity is liable for ... alleged interpretation of the contract. The ordinary negligence standard of N.J.S.A . 59:2-2 must give way to the more stringent "palpably unreasonable" standard ...

docket:	a4430-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63516