Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 59:3-3")   76 to 90 of 98 results. Run time: 0.827 seconds | Search time: 0.820 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Previous 15 Next 8
76 ROBERT ALSTON v. CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. -- rank: 609
... 364. The Court held, however, that the immunity afforded in N.J.S.A. 59:3-3 (section 3-3) applied. That section provides in relevant part ... public employees or public entities under section 2b(2) or N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, the good faith immunity, from injuries to innocent bystanders caused ...
docket: a6045-98
court: njappellate
decided: 2000-06-27
status: published
citation: 332 N.J.Super. 240
Document Size: 20432
77 FRANCIS E. JOBES, JR. v. ALBERT EVANGELISTA, et al. -- rank: 604
... Defendant's claim of qualified immunity is based primarily on N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, which reads in full as follows:     A public employee is ... the good-faith exoneration of a public employee accorded by N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. And compare Velez v. City of Jersey City , 358 N ...
docket: A0089-02
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2004-04-28
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 37958
78 MIGUEL A. ALVARADO v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY -- rank: 604
... defendants immune from liability under the Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, which states that "[a] public employee is not liable if ... accident date]," and thus good faith immunity attached pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, as interpreted in Canico v. Hurtado , 144 N.J. 361 ... good faith in the execution or enforcement of any law." N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. See also Canico , supra , 144 N.J. at 365. This ...
docket: a5353-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-10-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23136
79 FRANCIS E. JOBES, JR. v. ALBERT EVANGELISTA, et al. -- rank: 604
... Defendant's claim of qualified immunity is based primarily on N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, which reads in full as follows:     A public employee is ... the good-faith exoneration of a public employee accorded by N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. And compare Velez v. City of Jersey City , 358 N ...
docket: a6657-01
court: njappellate
decided: 2004-04-28
status: published
citation: 369 N.J. Super. 384
Document Size: 36579
80 RYAN ANDREW BROWN v. PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 590
... for the good faith execution or enforcement of any law. N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. There is nothing in this record to support a contention ...
docket: a2588-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-01-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41515
81 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1473-19.opn.html -- rank: 588
... 3-2; the good faith execution or enforcement of law, N.J.S.A. 59:3-3; and the failure to adopt or enforce any law, N ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 12729
82 GERALDINE MURRAY v. PLAINFIELD RESCUE SQUAD -- rank: 585
... used in describing the qualified immunity of public employees under N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, which provides: "A public employee is not liable if he ...
docket: a2906-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-03-30
status: published
citation: 418 N.J. Super. 574 15 A.3d 30
Document Size: 44101
83 HEATHER GENSINGER v. IRIS REYES -- rank: 585
... public employee from liability for false arrest or false imprisonment.' N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. The TCA also extends immunity to a public employee 'for ...
docket: a2701-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-11-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 39546
84 BRIAN STIANCHI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES -- rank: 583
... that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. A government official is entitled to qualified immunity from liability ... maintained accurately if such updates are not posted. By contrast, N.J.S.A. 59:3-3 provides for good faith immunity, stating "[a] public employee is ...
docket: a2360-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-03-17
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48821
85 ESTATE OF ANDREW MURNIEKS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 576
... claim, reprising their argument that such claims do not implicate N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. Because the motion court's 2 Plaintiffs also sued the ... meritorious on the basis that . . . defendants qualify for immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-3 because the actions taken in this emergency situation were reasonable ...
docket: a4197-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-10-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18291
86 IAN M. SCHWEIZER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE -- rank: 573
... good faith in the execution or enforcement of any law.' N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. ''To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a public ...
docket: a2075-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-09-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33825
87 MARTIN TORRES v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al. -- rank: 569
... 364. The Court held, however, that the immunity afforded in N.J.S.A. 59:3-3 (section 3-3) applied. That section provides in relevant part ...
docket: a2718-98
court: njappellate
decided: 2000-04-03
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 12304
88 THERESE BRADY v. BOROUGH OF GLEN RIDGE GLEN RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 549
... FALSE IMPRISONMENT. . . . . III. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN THAT, PER N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, NO GOOD FAITH DEFENSE EXISTS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND NO ...
docket: a5740-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-04-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49833
89 J.W. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON -- rank: 538
... the acts complained of were engaged in good faith. See N.J.S.A. 59:3-3. The standard is one of objective reasonableness. Wildoner v. Borough ...
docket: a1557-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-09
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 10631
90 RONALD GILGALLON v. R.C. SHEA & ASSOCIATES -- rank: 528
... consisting of "actual fraud, malice and willful misconduct pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:3-3 and 59:4-14" and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants ...
docket: a4050-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-07-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 59535
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Previous 15 Next 8
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!