Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 TERRY POLITO v. MILLBURN TOWNSHIP -- rank: 811

... 193 N.J. Super. 413 , 416 (App. Div. 1984). Under N.J.S.A. 59:4-1, a "dangerous condition" is defined as "a condition of property ... requires that the condition create a "substantial risk of injury." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1. A "substantial risk" is neither minor, trivial, nor insignificant. Polyard ...

docket:	a5923-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63032

17 MICHAEL C. KAIN v. GLOUCESTER CITY -- rank: 804

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a). Liability is permitted for an injury caused by a ...

docket:	a4854-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:	436 N.J.Super. 466 94 A.3d 937
Document Size:	46208

18 MARC J. MIGNANO v. JIM SULLIVAN, INC. -- rank: 801

... property that is owned or controlled by the public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(c). Here, the property is private property that was owned ...

docket:	a2995-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	125617

19 JOHN SEALS v. COUNTY OF MORRIS -- rank: 801

... property since the pole is not property of the County. N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 and 4-2. Likewise, plaintiff's counsel also conceded that ...

docket:	a5433-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-24
status:	published
citation:	417 N.J.Super. 74 8 A.3d 796
Document Size:	84750

20 ANTHONY SCHANZ v. TOWNSHIP OF WINSLOW -- rank: 796

... 194 (2003). Plaintiff failed to establish several of these elements. N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a) defines "dangerous condition" as "a condition of property that ...

docket:	a6056-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50829

21 PATRICE M. GRZANKA VS KURT P. PFEIFER, ET AL -- rank: 788

... the City is not immune under the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to -9, See footnote 1 but rather is liable under ... in Margolis and Novak, Claims Against Public Entities , comment on N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 (1997) as follows:             Note that it has been held that ...

docket:	a5766-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-03
status:	published
citation:	301 N.J.Super. 563
Document Size:	48603

22 PATRICE M. GRZANKA VS KURT P. PFEIFER, ET AL -- rank: 788

... the City is not immune under the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to -9, See footnote 1 but rather is liable under ... in Margolis and Novak, Claims Against Public Entities , comment on N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 (1997) as follows:             Note that it has been held that ...

docket:	a5372-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-03
status:	published
citation:	301 N.J.Super. 563
Document Size:	48605

23 Donald T. Polzo, etc. v. County of Essex, et al. -- rank: 786

... N.J. 569, 960 A.2d 375. Original MSWord Version N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to 14-4, the proofs offered by the plaintiff sufficiently ... The Court considers whether, under the Tort Claims Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to 14-4, the proofs offered by the plaintiff sufficiently ... the intersection of the provisions of the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:4-1 to 14-4, that govern claims against governmental entities arising ...

docket:	a-69-07
court:
decided:	2008-12-03
status:
citation:	196 N.J. 569 960 A.2d 375
Document Size:	95134

24 LEONICE M. WURST v. CITY OF OCEAN CITY -- rank: 780

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used.' N.J.S.A. 59:4-1. '[M]any bicyclists may be inclined to ride on a ... constitute a dangerous condition, as that term is defined in N.J.S.A. 59:4-1. The intended use of a roadway is for motor vehicles ... did not 'create[] a substantial risk of injury' to motorists. N.J.S.A. 59:4-1. Moreover, Ms. Wurst was not riding her bicycle in the ... was a dangerous condition as that term is defined in N.J.S.A. 59:4-1, plaintiffs failed to establish that the City had either actual ...

docket:	a1104-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	76065

25 SANDRA FELDMAN v. THE MAPLE GROUP, LLC. -- rank: 778

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a); see also Garrison v. Twp. of Middletown , 154 N ...

docket:	a3429-06_1
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	81916

26 ROBERT DIMATTIES, JR v. SOMERDALE PARK SCHOOL -- rank: 775

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a). A "substantial risk" is "one that is not minor ... against a dangerous condition, or warning of a dangerous condition." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(b). For the purposes of a motion for summary judgment ...

docket:	a3769-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46496

27 ANGELA PRESTOL v. HENPAL REALTY ASSOCIATES LLC -- rank: 775

... that the pothole was not a 'dangerous condition' covered by N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a) because 'it was homogenous with the surrounding roadway . . . [and ...

docket:	a0633-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53143

28 ALBERT WOOD v. TOWNSHIP OF WALL -- rank: 773

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used." N.J.S.A. 59:4-1. We have said that "a condition of public property which ...

docket:	a0751-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44069

29 ALEXANDER FERRIS, v. AIDA BLANCO-ALQUACIL -- rank: 770

... of Middletown, 154 N.J. 282, 286–87 (1998) (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:4- 1(a)). Whether the property presents a dangerous condition, and whether ... a substantial risk of injury' when 'used with due care[.]' N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a). The crosswalk was appropriately marked and visible to approaching ... crosswalk and intersection formed a dangerous condition, as defined by N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a), summary judgment was appropriate. In his supplemental brief, plaintiff ...

docket:	a0317-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24098

30 LOUELLA FRISON v. A-1 LIMOUSINE, INC. -- rank: 768

... which it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used.' N.J.S.A. 59:4-1(a). The condition must present a 'substantial risk of injury ...

docket:	a0763-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31021