Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 GILBERT HERNANDEZ v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX -- rank: 638

... is also covered by the immunity provisions set forth under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. Under this section, "[n]either a public entity nor a ...

docket:	a0738-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-11-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55952

17 ROBERT KOEHLER and SUSAN KOEHLER v. MICHAEL SMITH -- rank: 618

... construction' by a public entity or public employee. 5 Under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, '[n]either a public entity nor a public employee is ... is immunity for failure to provide ordinary traffic signals under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 but by simply labeling an ordinary, continuing and long[-]standing ...

docket:	a2414-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-09-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29805

18 Ian Michael Wymbs, et als. V. Township of Wayne, et als. -- rank: 582

... by a governmental agency.     Similarly, the “sign” immunity provided by N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 protects a public entity from liability for injuries “caused by ... a dangerous condition. That assertion does not implicate immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. D.     Next, we address the claim of reversible error based ...

docket:	a-114-98
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-05-11
status:
citation:	163 N.J. 523
Document Size:	58618

19 DONNA SCHACK v. CITY OF BAYONNE -- rank: 565

... d), 4-5, and 5-4. Bayonne relies first on N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, likening the removal of the crossing guard to a decision ... ordinary traffic signals, signs, markings or other similar devices." See N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. The use of the term "devices," however, may not have ...

docket:	a4965-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20650

20 ROGER MACALUSO, et al. v. WADE KNOWLES; FIRST FIDELITY GROUP, INC. et al. -- rank: 540

... pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-4 and N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. We disagree with these contentions, which are clearly without merit ...

docket:	a6440-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-06-05
status:	published
citation:	341 N.J. Super. 112
Document Size:	14076

21 Halina Jablonowska v. David P. Suther -- rank: 537

... Hoy v. Capelli , 48 N.J. 81 (1966) when adopting N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, and codified holding in Bergen v. Koppenal , 52 N.J ...

docket:	a-9-07
court:
decided:	2008-06-10
status:
citation:	195 N.J. 91
Document Size:	140825

22 SUNDARRAJ CHINNARAJ v. NABIL HUSSEIN CHEHAB -- rank: 530

... on public entities for dangerous conditions on public property. However, N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 confers immunity on a public entity and its employees for ... A. 58:4-4 (the emergency signal liability provision) and N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 (the traffic signal immunity provision) codified the law announced in ...

docket:	a2793-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57992

23 ALEX PLUCHINO v. BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD and STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RUTHERFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION and COUNTY OF BERGEN -- rank: 525

... October 20, 1989-well before the accident. Immunity pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, which relates to "ordinary" traffic signs and signals, is not ...

docket:	a1481-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-02-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	82397

24 COLLEEN WEISER, et al. v. COUNTY OF OCEAN and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 522

... Mr. Weiser's accident, the County is not liable under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, which states:     Neither a public entity nor a public employee ...

docket:	a1369-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-11-30
status:	published
citation:	326 N.J.Super. 187
Document Size:	17881

25 NORA LUCZAK VS TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM -- rank: 517

... construct or erect ordinary traffic signals, signs or markings under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. Discovery then continued and eventually a jury trial commenced on ...

docket:	a2850-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-12
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	25145

26 Christina DiProspero v. Barbara J. Penn, et al. -- rank: 505

... v. Capelli , 48 N.J. 81 (1966), when it adopted N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 and codified Court’s holding in Bergen v. Koppenal , 52 ...

docket:	a-66-03
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2004-11-29
status:
citation:
Document Size:	73117

27 BRIJAL SONI v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE -- rank: 499

... 2-3d; and (5) failure to provide ordinary traffic signals, N.J.S.A. 59:4-5. This appeal followed. On appeal, plaintiffs contend, in part, that ...

docket:	a4483-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22074

28 MASON LESSA, a minor by his natural parent and guardian ad litem DONNA LESSA v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON and ANNEMARIE WEWER AND SCOTT HAROLD NATZEL -- rank: 482

... ordinary" traffic control devices and those necessitated by emergent situations. N.J.S.A. 59:4-5 establishes immunity for "ordinary" traffic signals: Neither a public entity ...

docket:	a2140-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-19
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	24378

29 KATHLEEN FITZGERALD v. COUNTY OF SUSSEX -- rank: 479

... County's argument that it is entitled to immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, which provides immunity with respect to the traffic signs, is ...

docket:	a1503-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-12-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56009

30 ANDREW J. BUTERBAUGH v. TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON -- rank: 464

... must also fail in light of the immunity provided by N.J.S.A. 59:4-5, which states that a public entity is not liable "for ...

docket:	a2431-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	22262