Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 MAUREEN WIDOFSKY v. NEW BRUNSWICK PARKING AUTHORITY -- rank: 677

... to immunity under the TCA, including plan and design immunity, N.J.S.A. 59:4- 6, and discretionary immunity, N.J.S.A. 59:2-3 ... entitled to immunity as a matter of law pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-6.' That statutory provision provides immunity under the TCA from liability ...

docket:	a3837-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21394

32 Thomas J. Stewart v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority -- rank: 664

... specifications.” Vanchieri, 104 N.J. at 86; see also N.J.S.A. 59:4-6; Ciambrone v. Dep’t of Transp., 233 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a-61-20
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2022-02-09
status:
citation:
Document Size:	41379

33 LEONIDES STERGIOS v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP -- rank: 664

... does not contend it was entitled to immunity pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. Accordingly, the question is whether the evidence submitted on the ...

docket:	a4344-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17722

34 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0305-18.opn.html -- rank: 645

... design is prepared in conformity with standards previously so approved. [N.J.S.A. 59:4-6(a).] The Borough was required to establish plan or design ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25808

35 KATHLEEN FITZGERALD v. COUNTY OF SUSSEX -- rank: 645

... County of Sussex is immune from this claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 Plan or Design Immunity. . . . . . . . Pursuant to 189 N.J. 436 ... of the road itself is barred by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:4-6, which grants design immunity to public entities. Consequently, she does ...

docket:	a1503-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-12-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56009

36 CHRISTIANNA PITCHER v. OCEAN RIDE -- rank: 636

... None of those sections are applicable here. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 (declaring immunity for injuries caused by the plan or design ...

docket:	a0102-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41873

37 Montclair State University v. County of Passaic -- rank: 626

... the public regarding their roadways and ancillary public lands. See N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 (providing for and addressing scope of plan or design immunity ...

docket:	a_16_17
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2018-08-06
status:
citation:
Document Size:	65353

38 RUTH M. LEIBIG, et al v. SOMERVILLE SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING, INC. -- rank: 626

... decedent. In response, defendant claimed immunity from suit based on N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 which provides: ��������Neither the public entity nor a public employee ... the Tort Claims Act was operative. We assume it was N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 because on the facts presented and in light of the ... immunity, the basic elements of plan-or-design immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:4-6, on the facts here presented, are a public entity, public ... public property" nature of its building. ����To establish immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:4-6, it is also necessary to show that the design feature ...

docket:	a0869-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-11-24
status:	published
citation:	326 N.J.Super. 102
Document Size:	19396

39 RONALD J. GORE ANDBERNADETTE GORE, HIS WIFE V. WILLIAM K. HEPWORTH, FMI TRUCKING INC., CITY OF JERSEY CITY, C&F CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. & ET ALS -- rank: 614

... Co., Inc. (C&F Concrete) were immune from liability under N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 of the Tort Claims Act. A different Law Division judge ... for summary judgment based on plan and design immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:4-6 and C&F Concrete later sought the same relief. In ... for plan and design were properly shielded from liability under N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. See Costa v. Josey , 83 N.J. 49 , 63 (1980 ...

docket:	a6086-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-10-30
status:	published
citation:	316 N.J.Super. 234
Document Size:	27414

40 RAMAPO BRAE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. et al. v. BERGEN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al. -- rank: 601

... in its brief on appeal, cites the statute of limitations ( N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. Leibig v. Somerville Senior Citizens Hous., Inc. , 326 N.J ...

docket:	a1962-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-03-01
status:	published
citation:	328 N.J.Super. 561
Document Size:	60634

41 GIANI PETTY v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 598

... IMMUNE UNDER N.J.S.A. 59:2-3 AND N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. POINT II PLAINTIFF FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE NOTICE PROVISIONS ...

docket:	a4126-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21952

42 LISA BARTON v. BURLINGTON COUNTY, et al. -- rank: 589

... entitled to the specific plan or design immunity accorded by N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. We conclude the motion judge erred with respect to each ... design is prepared in conformity with standards previously so approved. [ N.J.S.A. 59:4-6.] "Application of plan-or-design immunity turns on whether the ...

docket:	A3805-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-10-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41424

43 MELISSA GUERRA v. TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST -- rank: 576

... be immune from liability under another provision of the TCA, N.J.S.A. 59:4-6. Similarly, a claim that the township did not enact ordinances ...

docket:	a3386-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31470

44 Estate of Alvin J. Townsend, Jr. v. NOAH PIERRE -- rank: 561

... provides plan or design immunity to the Township pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:4-6(a), which provides, in pertinent part: Neither the public entity ...

docket:	a4039-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-25
status:	published
citation:	429 N.J.Super. 522 60 A.3d 800
Document Size:	32052

45 JUSTIN LOUIS RODRIGUEZ v. LIVINGSTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 551

... public entity or public authority authorized to give such approval. N.J.S.A. 59:4-6(a). Plaintiff contends that the motion judge erred by finding ...

docket:	a4036-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34730