Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 59:5-4")   16 to 30 of 36 results. Run time: 0.656 seconds | Search time: 0.649 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 6
16 PATRICIA RUFF v. WEST KINNEY GARDENS -- rank: 605
... to 12-3, as a matter of law pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which states "Neither a public entity nor a public employee ... Newark property, Newark would still qualify for immunity pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. We agree. The Tort Claims Act's guiding principle is ... 59 (1989). This court has stated the legislative purpose behind N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 "is to protect the public entity's 'essential right and ... 300 (1980)), certif. denied , 96 N.J. 291 (1984). Additionally, N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 precludes suits against public entities "based upon contentions that damage ... clear Newark is immune from the present suit pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Therefore, Newark is entitled to summary judgment. The location of ... protection, a claim from which Newark is protected pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Reversed and remanded for the entry of judgment of ...
docket: a2116-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15117
17 LAURA PAPPAS v. UNION TOWNSHIP -- rank: 600
... entity with immunity. Malloy , supra , 76 N.J. at 521. N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 provides that "[n]either a public entity nor a public ... J. Super. 144 , 151 (App. Div. 1989). According to plaintiffs, N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not make defendants immune from liability because defendants' actions ... defendants, the troopers and the State, had no immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, stated that the statute did "not insulate police officers from ... under N.J.S.A. 59:3-5, and not N.J.S.A. 59:5-4: Vinci's decisions in the field were protected under N ... Super. ___ (App. Div. 2010). We did so while recognizing that " N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not insulate [them] from [the] unfortunate results of their ... N.J. Super. at 496 (quotation omitted)) and, similarly that " N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 in their brief. They also contend that while defendants ...
docket: a5850-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49179
18 JACK NEWMAN, et al. v. EUGENE NEWMAN -- rank: 598
... her omission to the same extent as a private person." N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 provides: "Neither a public entity nor a public employee is ...
docket: a6710-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-05-04
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 156229
19 DONNA SCHACK v. CITY OF BAYONNE -- rank: 598
... and how police equipment is allocated are also immune. See N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 (establishes immunity for "failure to provide police protection"). At argument ...
docket: a4965-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-03-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20650
20 PARIS WILSON, an infant by his Guardian Ad Litem, SONYA MANZANO and D\'ARTAGNAN MANZANO Individually and as Administrator of the Estates of DEQUAN WILSON and DARTAGNANIA WILSON, and DEQUAN WILSON and DARTAGNANIA WILSON, Individually v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Police Officer JOSE M. SANTANA (Shield No. 2853), Police Officer ERNEST VIDAL (Shield No. 2395 911 Operator LAURA JEAN PETERSEN Operator No. 35), Radio Dispatcher MICHAEL EDWARD CLARK 911 Operator BRENDA MURDAUGH-JONES Operator No. 326), STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE 911 Operator LU ANN BURD - and CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Police Officer JOSE M. SANTANA (Shield No. 2853 Police Officer ERNEST VIDAL (Shield No. 2395), 911 Operator LAURA JEAN PETERSEN (Operator No. 35 Radio Dispatcher MICHAEL EDWARD CLARK, and 911 Operator BRENDA MURDAUGH-JONES Operator No. 326 Defendants-Third-Party v. DWAYNE WILSON and 185 MARTIN LUTHER KING DRIVE, LLC; STATE OF NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE Third-Party Defendants -- rank: 593
... A. 59:3-2 (Petersen, Murdaugh-Jones, Santana, and Vidal); N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 (Santana and Vidal); and N.J.S.A. 52:17C ... its employees sought refuge under the correlative principles embodied in N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which provides immunity for the failure of a public entity ... which held that "where police officers negligently perform ministerial duties, . . . ' N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not insulate [them] from [the] unfortunate results of their ... Div. 1979), certif. denied , 82 N.J. 300 (1980)). Similarly, N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 where police left scene and perpetrator returned to inflict harm ...
docket: a4044-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-04
status: published
citation: 415 N.J. Super. 138 1 A.3d 723
Document Size: 102889
21 NINA PAGAN v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 578
... He also concluded NHA was immune from liability pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 (immunizing public entities and employees "for failure to provide police ... inadequate policing of security at the housing site. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, the TCA would indeed immunize NHA from such a claim ...
docket: a3296-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18799
22 LINDA REIS, et al. v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY -- rank: 573
... through 12-3 (the TCA). In particular, defendants claimed that N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which provides immunity to public entities and their employees "for ... summary judgment to Newark based upon the immunity provided by N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, we concluded that "where police officers negligently perform ministerial duties, . . . ' N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not insulate [them] from [the] unfortunate results of their ... 1 operator duties is not entitled to any immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:5-4." Mass a chi , supra , 396 N.J. Super. at 498 ... that Mass a chi erroneously interpreted the immunity provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, and that our earlier holding in Sczyrek , supra , should control ... t]he issue posed [] [as] whether the immunity provision of N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 applies when the liability claim is based on alleged ' ...
docket: A1418-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-02-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51515
23 CITY OF CAMDEN, et al. v. RYSHAONE H. THOMAS -- rank: 573
... through 12-3 (the TCA). In particular, defendants claimed that N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which provides immunity to public entities and their employees "for ... summary judgment to Newark based upon the immunity provided by N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, we concluded that "where police officers negligently perform ministerial duties, . . . ' N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 does not insulate [them] from [the] unfortunate results of their ... 1 operator duties is not entitled to any immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:5-4." Mass a chi , supra , 396 N.J. Super. at 498 ... that Mass a chi erroneously interpreted the immunity provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, and that our earlier holding in Sczyrek , supra , should control ... t]he issue posed [] [as] whether the immunity provision of N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 applies when the liability claim is based on alleged ' ...
docket: A2356-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-02-19
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51506
24 DAVID FOSTER v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 568
... judge erroneously denied its motion for summary judgment based on N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which provides that a public entity is not liable for ...
docket: A1614-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-11-21
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 52839
25 SHANA FAITH MASSACHI v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 563
... to immunity under a portion of the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Plaintiff appealed. We held that the Tort Claims Act did ...
docket: a5252-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-04
status: published
citation: 415 N.J. Super. 518 2 A.3d 1117
Document Size: 97515
26 DANTE METTA v. MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP -- rank: 556
... may provide the public entity with immunity. Id. at 521. N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 provides that "[n]either a public entity nor a public ...
docket: a6138-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-05-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36422
27 KAREN MAFFUCCI v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 519
... to pro[t]ect that would fall within immunity under [ N.J.S.A. ] 59:5-4. The [ยง]1983 [Fourteenth] Amendment claims . . . also fail because I ... not properly protected from the escape and its consequences, the N.J.S.A. 59:5-4 immunity for police protection services also applies to insulate defendants ...
docket: a4369-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-04-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23066
28 L.T. v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 499
... provide police protection . . . or . . . failure to provide sufficient police protection.' N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Further, the TCA states '[a] public employee is A-0856 ...
docket: a0856-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-01-28
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22953
29 CHARLOTTE M. GILMORE, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of SHANINA RENEE GILMORE, Deceased, and as Mother and Natural Guardian of SHANINA RENEE GILMORE, a minor v. -- rank: 497
... police employee is liable for failing to provide police protection. N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Whenever a plaintiff alleges that public entities and employees did ... of a crime, that claim falls within the scope of N.J.S.A. 59:5-4. Rodriquez v. N.J. Sports & Expo. Auth. , 193 N.J ...
docket: A0899-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-01-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52860
30 JEFFREY & DAVID & LUCY SCHWARZ VS PORT AUTHORITY TRANSIT CORPORATION DIVISION OF THE DELAWARE PORT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA -- rank: 487
... a public entity for dangerous conditions on its property, and N.J.S.A. 59:5-4, which immunizes a public entity for failure to provide police ...
docket: a1421-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-12-02
status: published
citation: 305 N.J.Super. 581
Document Size: 36161
 Page:1 2 3 Previous 15 Next 6
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!