Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 TYQUAN MCCALL v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 637

... against NJT beyond the ninety-day period otherwise required under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Plaintiff's counsel submitted a certification in support of the ... ninety days after the accrual of a cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The notice requirement is intended to "'expedite investigation with the ...

docket:	a2054-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-01-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21983

122 H.C. EQUITIES, LP v. COUNTY OF UNION, NEW JERSEY, -- rank: 637

... of the accrual of the cause of action.' Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 59:8-8). The plaintiff may file a late notice of claim within ... claimant from bringing the tort claim against the public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). The written notice must include the following information: (a ...

docket:	a2903-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29823

123 CHARLES CICALA v. CITY OF BRIGANTINE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 637

... entity within ninety days of the accrual of his claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 provides limited relief from the time restrictions of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. It provides: A claimant who fails to file notice of ... motion for relief from the ninety-day time period of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 fails to disclose extraordinary circumstances for plaintiff's delay in ...

docket:	a4545-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14052

124 CHARLES CICALA v. CITY OF BRIGANTINE -- rank: 637

... entity within ninety days of the accrual of his claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 provides limited relief from the time restrictions of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. It provides: A claimant who fails to file notice of ... motion for relief from the ninety-day time period of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 fails to disclose extraordinary circumstances for plaintiff's delay in ...

docket:	a4652-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14011

125 COLLEEN BAUMAN, Individually et al. v. DAISY GWIN, et al. -- rank: 635

... Rules , comment 1.1 on R. 2:2-3 (2007). N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 entitled, "Time for presentation of claim" requires, in pertinent part ... to amend its previously timely filed notice of claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The Law Division order did not extend the time in ...

docket:	A1294-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36257

126 MARIA & SOLY SERRANO V. JOHN C. GIBSON, ET ALS -- rank: 633

... 23, 1994, N.J.S.A. 59:8-3 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 were amended to subject such claims to that notice requirement ... In granting defendant Gibson's motion to dismiss based upon N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, the motion judge seems to have considered both the 1994 ... obligations of N.J.S.A. 59:8-3 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, which now must be met during that time period as ... or to clarify what had been intended. Prior to 1994, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, by their express terms, applied only to public employers. This ... the procedure set forth in this chapter." (Emphasis added). Similarly, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 barring tort claims where the ninety-day notice has not ... we agree or disagree with this analysis, the amendments to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 contain no comparable language. We view Cornblatt as an ...

docket:	a0790-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-09-23
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	21637

127 G.Y. v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC -- rank: 633

... 147 (2013) (citing McDade, 208 N.J. at 473-74). N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires a plaintiff to file a notice of claim upon ... cause of action.' McDade, 208 N.J. at 468 (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:8-8). Claimants 'shall be forever barred from recovering against a public ... otherwise provided in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9[.]' N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). 'The purpose of the ninety-day deadline is to ...

docket:	a0958-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18943

128 JONATHAN JEFFREY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 630

... notice of claim 1 within ninety days of its accrual. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The Law Division has the discretion to grant a claimant ... and denied the relief requested on June 8, 2018. II. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires a notice of claim 'relating to a cause of ... 1187-18 7 judiciary to construe the term 'accrual' in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 in a manner that abandons all vestiges of basic human ... only thirty-five days beyond the ninety-day timeframe in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. We review a trial court's finding of extraordinary circumstances ...

docket:	a1187-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-18
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18007

129 ANTHONY KONAH v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 628

... days of the February 5, 2009 accident as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Instead, almost one year later, on January 29, 2010, he ... the ninetieth day after accrual of the cause of action." N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. "Generally, in the case of tortious conduct resulting in injury ... the date he was injured. He was therefore required, under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, to file his notice of claim with the City within ...

docket:	a4000-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17845

130 LORNA PEART v. UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY -- rank: 628

... public entity within ninety days of the claim's accrual. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). The TCA's notice provisions are 'not intended as ...

docket:	a1618-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25477

131 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0597-17.opn.html -- rank: 626

... ninety days after the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8- - 8. After six months from the date the notice of the ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	97262

132 J.P. v. GREGORY J. SMITH -- rank: 626

... submitted before the running of the statutory ninety-day limit. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. She further argued that the statute of limitations was tolled ... 2A:14-2, and the notice provisions of the TCA, N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Even if the "discovery rule" applies, plaintiff's own expert ... day period within which notice must be given pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Since the record is clear, the School maintains there is ... ninety days of the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 somewhat alleviates the ... Plaintiff's failure to comply with the time requirement of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a) constitutes an absolute bar to recovery against the School ...

docket:	a0055-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-07
status:	published
citation:	444 N.J.Super. 507 134 A.3d 977
Document Size:	66091

133 LOURDES SYLVESTER et al. v. DR. LAWRENCE HARRISON -- rank: 626

... the notice and damages provisions of the Act, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, 8-9 and 9-2d. The matter proceeded through discovery ... plaintiffs' failure to comply with the notice provisions pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 and 8-9 of the Act; and (2) plaintiffs' failure ... public employee is compliance with the Act's notice provisions. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 requires any person asserting a claim against a public employee ... at 640-42. It observed that the 1994 amendments to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, which added language that a claimant's reasons for non ...

docket:	a6582-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-03
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	47500

134 JOSHUA JACKSON v. CITY OF PASSAIC HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 624

... sufficient reasons constituting extraordinary circumstances justified the filing delay. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 and -9. The trial court rejected plaintiff's argument he ... in which the alleged negligent conduct causing the injury occurred. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; Ben Elazar v. Marcrietta Cleaners, Inc., 230 N.J. 123 ... within the ninety-day window, the claim is permanently barred. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; Jones v. Morey's Pier, Inc., 230 N.J. 142 ...

docket:	a0900-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21473

135 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4168-19.opn.html -- rank: 624

... to comply with the notice requirements of the TCA, see N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, but plaintiffs do not offer any legal authority supporting the ... file a notice of tort claim, as is required under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, the court erred in doing so. A-4168-19 20 ... Cleaners, Inc., 230 N.J. 123, 133 (2017); see also N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. A court must determine the date of accrual 'in accordance ... step in assessing whether a notice of tort claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 is 'determin[ing] the date on which the claim accrued ...

docket:
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	75634