Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

91 ESTATE OF AUSTIN J PISANO v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY -- rank: 666

... the 90th day after accrual of the cause of action.' N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. However, 'the notice provisions of the [TCA] were not intended ... of review. 'In determining whether a notice of claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 has been timely filed, a sequential analysis must be undertaken ...

docket:	a5665-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21516

92 J.C. v. CAROL D'ANNUNZIO -- rank: 664

... otherwise provided in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.' N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, [a ... ninety days of the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Relying on Dr. Hatchard's report, plaintiff argues his claim ... Plaintiff's failure to comply with the time requirement of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a) constitutes an absolute bar to recovery against [these defendants ...

docket:	a1984-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46633

93 JUAN S. MENDEZ v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -- rank: 664

... ownership of the vehicle and the location of the tunnel. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. On December 22 and 23, 2009, Felix and Mendez, respectively ... Tort Claims notices against appellants beyond the ninety-day deadline. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; -9. The decision was memorialized in orders of March 2 ...

docket:	a3403-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-04
status:	published
citation:	416 N.J. Super. 525 6 A.3d 484
Document Size:	31972

94 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4008-19.opn.html -- rank: 662

... action or else be 'forever barred' from asserting that claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. 'The rationale underlying the notice requirement of the [TCA] is ... notice of his claim within [ninety] days as provided in [ N.J.S.A.] 59:8-8 . . . may, in the discretion of a judge of the Superior ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24134

95 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1618-19.opn.html -- rank: 662

... be filed within ninety days of the claim's accrual. N.J.S.A. 59:8- 8. The attorney did not tell her that anything else could ... accrual. O'Donnell, 236 N.J. at 345; see also N.J.S.A. 59:8- 8. A court may grant a plaintiff who has not met ... Cleaners, Inc., 230 N.J. 123, 133 (2017); see also N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). Our Supreme Court requires judges determining the timeliness of a notice of claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 to perform a 'sequential analysis.' Bayer v. Twp. of Union ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26833

96 JUAN S. MENDEZ v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -- rank: 662

... ownership of the vehicle and the location of the tunnel. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. On December 22 and 23, 2009, Felix and Mendez, respectively ... Tort Claims notices against appellants beyond the ninety-day deadline. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8; -9. The decision was memorialized in orders of March 2 ...

docket:	a3409-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-04
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	31798

97 ROSINA MARANO v. MELVIN ROMERO -- rank: 659

... to file notice of a claim against a public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). This notice requirement was created: (1) to allow the ...

docket:	a5350-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-04-16
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	51155

98 ROBERTA DUNN V. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, ET ALS -- rank: 657

... of claim provisions and the statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. On September 29, 1995, Mountainside's motion was granted.     In ... requirement that an injured person timely file suit, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, should have been tolled by the discovery rule. The motion ... plaintiff failed to meet the requirements of the discovery rule.      N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:             A claim relating to ... Rule 4:26-4, within the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. This rule would allow plaintiff to amend her complaint at ...

docket:	a5211-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-05-27
status:	published
citation:	301 N.J.Super. 262
Document Size:	45800

99 MORAIBA MOLINA v. JOSE ISMAEL ROMAN -- rank: 657

... as otherwise provided in N.J.S. 59:8-9." N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, "[a] claimant ...

docket:	a5357-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46895

100 Moon v. Warren Haven Nursing Home -- rank: 657

... suit after the required six-month waiting period provided by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. However, a late notice of claim, followed by a six ... ninety days of the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. However, the TCA provides that, after the ninety day period ... more than two years after the accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Like the California procedure, an order granting leave to file ...

docket:	a-23-04
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2005-03-08
status:
citation:	182 N.J. 507
Document Size:	44895

101 ROBERTA DUNN V. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, ET ALS -- rank: 657

... of claim provisions and the statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. On September 29, 1995, Mountainside's motion was granted.     In ... requirement that an injured person timely file suit, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, should have been tolled by the discovery rule. The motion ... plaintiff failed to meet the requirements of the discovery rule.      N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:             A claim relating to ... Rule 4:26-4, within the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. This rule would allow plaintiff to amend her complaint at ...

docket:	a3084-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-05-27
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	49461

102 TINISHA HOOD v. MAYA RAMAGOPAL, M.D. -- rank: 655

... defendants of her wrongful death and survivor claims pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. At the same time, plaintiff filed a motion for leave ... ninety days after the accrual of a cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The cause of action is generally considered to have accrued ... ninety days of the accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The purposes of the notice are as follows: (1) to ... employee if he fails to comply with the notice requirements. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). However, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 alleviates ...

docket:	a1480-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34954

103 DINESHA LEBRON v. LUIS SANCHEZ -- rank: 655

... s complaint against the Board for failure to comply with N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Our review determines plaintiff's notice adequately afforded notice of ... commenced within two years of his or her eighteenth birthday. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. The contents of a notice of claim submitted to the ... Court has observed the "'notice of claim' referred to in N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 is really a misnomer[,]" and, "is more properly denominated as ...

docket:	a5125-07
court:
decided:	2009-05-21
status:	Published
citation:	407 N.J. Super. 204 970 A.2d 399
Document Size:	63099

104 HAYWARD BROOKS v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 653

... the ninety-day period for filing claim notices prescribed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Plaintiff sought to avail himself of the late claim provision ...

docket:	a1444-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27704

105 HAYWARD BROOKS v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 653

... the ninety-day period for filing claim notices prescribed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Plaintiff sought to avail himself of the late claim provision ...

docket:	a1607-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27704