Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 JAMIE EPSTEIN VS STAE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, ET AL -- rank: 590

... to file a late notice of tort claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, against defendants the State of New Jersey, the County of ... permission to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The extraordinary circumstances are said to relate to the occurrence ... because of the Yom Kippur holiday constitutes "extraordinary circumstances" under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.     The issue is presented in this context: Yom Kippur is ...

docket:	a4450-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-05-12
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 350
Document Size:	23313

137 ERIKA NOGUERIA v. IDT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION -- rank: 590

... N.J. Tpk. Auth., 236 N.J. 335, 344 (2019); N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 (assigning the determination as to whether late notice may be ... Off. of Pub. Def., 208 N.J. 414, 420 (2011), N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 establishes a mechanism that a claimant could obtain judicial approval ... from the time of the accrual of the claim. Thus, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 allows 'a claimant to file an application for leave to ... the one-year limit under the statute. Id. at 158; N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 (stating that a party may file after the ninety-day ...

docket:	a0694-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17382

138 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 SHARIF ST. CLAIRE, a/k/a SH -- rank: 585

... made within one year after the accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 10, 2015, based upon ...

docket:	a0075-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14739

139 LUCILLE DELUCCA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al. -- rank: 585

... leave to file a late notice of claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, against defendants, State of New Jersey, Atlantic County, and Atlantic ... a notice of claim within the initial ninety-day period. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. An order memorializing the decision was entered on the same ... the ninetieth day after accrual of the cause of action." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, pertaining to late notice of claim, provides: A claimant who ... time of the accrual of the claim. The language of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 came about as the result of a 1994 amendment that ... of claim within a reasonable time thereafter" as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Ignorance of the ninety-day statutory requirement does not constitute ...

docket:	A1850-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-09-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33422

140 SABRINA PAGAN and MARIA OLIVARES v. EDUARDO RIVERA -- rank: 585

... motion was filed beyond the one-year limit imposed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, plaintiffs claimed their motion was timely due to the tolling ... by a 'judge of the Superior Court' in accordance with N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our ... a A-3096-19 7 timely] notice of claim' under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. This clearly violated Rule 1:7- 4(a). More fundamentally ... file a late notice of tort claim. They rely on N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which states that a claimant 'may, in the discretion of ...

docket:	a3096-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17966

141 RICHARD I. & LOIS M. WOOD, ET AL., VS COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, ET AL. -- rank: 585

... to file a late notice of claim in accordance with N.J.S.A. 59:8-9."     Following argument, the trial court granted plaintiffs leave to file ... would render meaningless the purpose of the 1994 amendment to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Here, plaintiffs, upon being notified by Florence Township of its ...

docket:	a5726-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-26
status:	published
citation:	302 N.J.Super. 371
Document Size:	21674

142 ROBERT AMBRICO v. BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR -- rank: 585

... 1 motion to file a late tort claims notice under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Plaintiff was employed by the Camden County Department of Health ... entity was not "substantially prejudiced" by the late claims notice. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Following entry of the order on that date, this appeal ... its discretion in ruling that plaintiff demonstrated both prongs of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 warranting late-filing relief. It emphasizes that although the decision ... late notice of claim with the permission of the court. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. To file a late notice, the claimant must demonstrate extraordinary ... claimant, this would be the very circumstance that the statute [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9] is designed to prevent, and relief should be denied."); Escalante ...

docket:	a2861-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15231

143 K.B. v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 582

... to meet [her] burden of showing extraordinary circumstances pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8- 9. See D.D. v. [Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of N ... period for filing is short, any harshness is alleviated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which permits the filing of late claims. Rogers v. Cape ... as long as the public entity is not 'substantially prejudiced.' N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. 3 Plaintiff also contends defendant was not substantially prejudiced by ... to satisfy her burden of demonstrating extraordinary circumstances pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 and D.D.4 In D.D., the Court held ... defendant public entity, did not constitute extraordinary circumstances pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. 213 N.J. at 150-51. The Court determined that ...

docket:	a2492-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18043

144 GARVIN MCKNIGHT v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al. -- rank: 582

... September 21, 2000, and that the limitations period contained in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 for the filing of a malpractice claim against a publicly ... present purposes that the filing occurred on the earlier date. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 provides a trial court with the discretion to permit a ...

docket:	a5527-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-12-31
status:	published
citation:	397 N.J.Super. 265
Document Size:	146598

145 RALPH ANGELES v. NEVIER RUIZ -- rank: 580

... claim or move to file a late claim notice under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. While the motion was pending, 2 The representative's letter ...

docket:	a3751-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-05-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35617

146 ESTATE OF EDGAR C GEIGER, III, v. ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL -- rank: 580

... plaintiff could have sought relief from the [c]ourt under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 seeking permission to serve the late notice on the appropriate ...

docket:	a2267-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24692

147 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2087-17.opn.html -- rank: 580

... storm of factors totaling extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, we reverse. When Ganame filed the initial application, defendant had ... We review decisions to grant or deny motions to file N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 late notices of claim under an abuse of discretion standard ... from recovering against a public entity or public employee . . . .' But N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 states that at the discretion of a Superior Court judge ... s burden to produce and demonstrate such substantial prejudice under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. See Mendez v. S. Jersey Transp. Auth., 416 N.J ... will not consider the prejudice aspect of the language in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The statute does not define extraordinary circumstances. The court's ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	21682

148 ANTHONY KONAH v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 577

... to file a late notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 upon the City and Officer Ahmad Q. Stuckley of the ... years from the time of the accrual of the claim. [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.] Prior to the amendment of the statute in 1994, the ... the "extraordinary circumstances" and the "reasonable time" statutory standards under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Based on plaintiff's certification, his injuries were serious, but ... of due diligence in the record precludes plaintiff from satisfying N.J.S.A. 59:8-9's other requirement that a claimant file a late notice ...

docket:	a4000-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17845

149 KEN M. MCKOY v. JOHN THOMAS CAPO, M.D. -- rank: 577

... name appeared more than 200 times in plaintiff's chart. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 grants the trial judge discretion to permit filing of late ... supported by affidavits based upon personal knowledge of the affiant . . . .' N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The affidavit must set 'forth only facts which are admissible ...

docket:	a0827-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34294

150 Brian Scott Owens, Sr., et al. v. Gerald Feigin, M.D., et al. -- rank: 577

... the claimant demonstrates good cause to justify a late filing, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, the trial court dismissed all claims against Feigin, N.J ...

docket:	a-43-07
court:
decided:	2008-06-03
status:
citation:	194 N.J. 607
Document Size:	43114