Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 KIRK B. SPARKS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 541

... leave to file a late notice of tort claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In support of his motion, and to establish extraordinary circumstances ... Tpk. Auth., 236 N.J. 335, 345-46 (2019). Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, a claimant may be permitted to file the late notice ... permitting the filing of a late notice of claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.' Allen v. Krause, 306 N.J. Super. 448, 455-56 ... high threshold of 'extraordinary A-5905-17T4 5 circumstances' under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. His conduct in the ninety days following the dismissal of ...

docket:	a5905-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11217

182 SHARON HARDY v. THERESA WRIGHT-JOHNSON -- rank: 538

... leave to file a notice of late claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 within the year following the accident. Instead, shortly before the ... period for filing is short, any harshness is alleviated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which allows for the filing of late claims. Rogers v ... a late notice of claim within a reasonable time thereafter . . . [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.] The statutory scheme does not permit tort claims plaintiffs to ...

docket:	a2797-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15052

183 CHARLES TALIAN v. DR. GREGORY PECK -- rank: 538

... COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN [ N.J.S.A.] 59:8-9 (Raised Below) A. The Discovery Rule was not Available to ... POINT III THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO FIND [ N.J.S.A.] 59:8-9 BARRED PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM (Raised Below). The issue of the ...

docket:	a2357-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25318

184 DOROTHY CORLISS and VERNON CORLISS, husband et al. v. et al. -- rank: 538

... of the claim within one year of accrual, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The motion judge initially heard arguments on January 5, 2006 ... ability to salvage their claim was to move pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which provides, A claimant who fails to file notice of ... time denied plaintiff the ability to move for relief under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Id. at 42. In Anske v. Palisades Park , 1 39 ... plaintiff lost the opportunity to move for relief pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Id. at 349-50. Unlike either of those cases, here ...

docket:	A0245-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42499

185 DOUGLAS BATES v. TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON -- rank: 536

... years from the time of the accrual of the claim. [N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.] Therefore, in order to file a late notice of claim ... investigation' is insufficient to constitute the substantial prejudice requirement under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Mendez, 416 N.J. Super. at 535. Substantial prejudice '[g ...

docket:	a0588-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24675

186 TONI CLARK v. ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE -- rank: 536

... nor had she filed one subsequently, despite the provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The judge observed that N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 permits the filing of a late tort claims notice at ... requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Moreover, even if we were to consider plaintiff's January ...

docket:	a4184-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15409

187 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3694-17.opn.html -- rank: 536

... the New Jersey Tort Claim Act (TCA) in accordance with N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. They contend that plaintiff failed to present any extraordinary circumstances ... circumstances she contended justified a late tort claim notice under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. At the hearing, plaintiff, twenty-seven years old at the ... In 1994, the Legislature added the 'extraordinary circumstances' language to N.J.S.A. 59:8- - 9, to replace a 'fairly permissive standard' with a 'more demanding ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20395

188 ANTONIO CHAPARRO NIEVES v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER -- rank: 533

... seek leave of court to file a late claim notice. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In Rogers v. Cape May Office of the Public Defender ... motion for leave to file a late claim notice. Ibid.; N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The Court held the date the indictment was dismissed was ...

docket:	a4475-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13863

189 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0322-21.opn.html -- rank: 533

... of accrual of the claim except as otherwise provided in N.J.S.[A. ]59:8-9 . . . .' N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 allows a court to permit a party to file a ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24496

190 JAMES JONES v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION -- rank: 533

... that late notices of claim should be allowed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The "extraordinary circumstances" language was added to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 in 1994 with the purpose of "rais[ing] the bar ... quoting Lowe v. Zarghami , 158 N.J. 606 , 625 (1999)). " N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 does not define `extraordinary circumstances.' In common parlance the term ...

docket:	a5393-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-09-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	197 N.J. 476
Document Size:	38727

191 SAMANTHA JAMES v. SUSSEX COUNTY JAIL -- rank: 525

... to file a late notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. Rule 1:6 ... Div. 2003), certif. denied , 179 N.J. 309 (2004). Moreover, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 states that applications to the court for leave to file ... upon a certification of counsel complies "with the spirit of [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9], if not the rule itself, and that defendants' hypertechnical reading ... days of accrual. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 authorizes the filing of a late claim beyond the ninety ...

docket:	a0158-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-11-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19175

192 JAMES HOWE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP -- rank: 525

... one year of the date of the accident, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. On May 13, 2005, an order was entered granting plaintiff ...

docket:	a5362-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	41998

193 JEFFREY S. WILLIAMS JR v. TINTON FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT TINTON FALLS POLICE OFFICER JAMES SAPIA TINTON FALLS CORPORAL BLAKE RUTHERFORD MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE DETECTIVE KEITH FINKELSTEIN and BOROUGH OF T -- rank: 523

... period for filing is short, any harshness is alleviated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which allows for the filing of late claims. Rogers v ... so long as the public entity is not "substantially prejudiced." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The statutory framework governing the "extraordinary circumstances" exception to the ...

docket:	a1521-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16304

194 A-0TERESA RAMEY v. SAMUEL DEMAIO, NEWARK'S ACTING POLICE DIRECTOR and THE NEWARK STAR LEDGER and ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE HOMICIDE TEAM Romesh Sukhdeo, Phillip Gregory, Miguel Arroyo, Carolyn A Murray, and Thomas Fennelly August 25, 2015 -- rank: 518

... permission to file a notice of late claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which provides, in pertinent part: A claimant who fails to ... the late filing of her notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The court granted DeMaio's motion and denied plaintiff's ... motions were brought within the one-year period mandated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Id. at 536. Second, in Mendez , the information contained in ...

docket:	a2615-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16910

195 D.N. and J.N v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH and FAMILY SERVICES -- rank: 518

... those dates. As a result, plaintiffs' application was governed by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which provides in pertinent part: A claimant who fails to ...

docket:	a4147-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18632