Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

196 EILEEN MARTINEZ v. CITY OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 515

... adequately supplemented the text notification so as to comply with N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. On appeal, defendant argues the judge erred in deeming plaintiff ...

docket:	a3692-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20180

197 ZILIA T. HERNANDEZ v. ANGEL M. ALFONSO, et al. -- rank: 515

... the ninetieth day after accrual of the cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 provides that a claimant who fails to file within the ... den ied 121 N.J . 592 (1990). The language of N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 came about as the result of a 1994 amendment that ...

docket:	a5810-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	41271

198 FRANK RUBURY v. ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL -- rank: 515

... a year of the accrual of his claims pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8- 9. Thus, Judge Natali concluded, the court lacked jurisdiction to consider ... extraordinary circumstances warranting leave to file a late notice. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The court, therefore, dismissed the claims against the State employee ...

docket:	a4453-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-01-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19130

199 GUIRGUIS MATTA v. BOULEVARD COURT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC -- rank: 512

... as the State of New Jersey and County of Hudson. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In support of his motion, plaintiff contended there were "extraordinary ... that the public entity . . . has not been substantially prejudiced thereby." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The motion must be "supported by affidavits based upon personal ... for" the failure to file a timely notice of claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Such use of hearsay, especially in the vague manner expressed ...

docket:	a2022-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24983

200 JAMES PRUDENCIANO v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH -- rank: 507

... circumstances' for missing the A-1452-20 8 filing deadline. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. If extraordinary circumstances justifying an extension of the time to ...

docket:	a1452-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18040

201 ESTATE OF NICHOLAS VALENTE v. TOMS RIVER BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 505

... legal standards. We affirm. On September 26, 2007, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, plaintiffs moved for leave to file out of time the ... so within one year of the accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Such a request may be granted only if a plaintiff ... present attorney, and well within the one year provided by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The circumstances here are sufficiently distinguishable from those presented in ...

docket:	a1790-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43042

202 NABIL ABDELKADER v. BERGEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOCIATION -- rank: 502

... to file a late notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. 3 We remand for further proceedings. The facts adduced from ... claim, and that plaintiff did not establish extraordinary circumstances under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Specifically, the City argues that plaintiff failed to make "reasonably ... notice "within one year after the accrual of his claim." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The granting or denial of permission to file a late ... time to file a notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, whether entered in the cause or by a separate action ...

docket:	a5368-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14697

203 ROBERT BRYANT v. BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 502

... period for filing is short, any harshness is alleviated by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which allows for the filing of late claims. Rogers v ... a late notice of claim within a reasonable time thereafter . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.] Plaintiffs argue here, as they did in the trial court ...

docket:	a4018-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14284

204 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4051-18.opn.html -- rank: 502

... 4051-18T1 2 the motion is '[d]enied pursuant to N.J.S.A. [59:8-9]. Plaintiff's motion of February 15, 2019 was granted in accordance with N.J.S.A. [59:8-9]. Extraordinary circumstances were shown as to why the notice of ... McDade v. Siazon, 208 N.J. 463, 477 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:8-9). Neither issue was mentioned in the judge's decision. In ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	14766

205 JAMES MURPHY v. COUNTY OF OCEAN -- rank: 497

... leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In his oral decision, the judge concluded plaintiff had "demonstrated ... not be 'substantially prejudiced' thereby." Id. at 476-77 (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:8-9). The TCA does not define what constitutes "extraordinary circumstances," leaving ...

docket:	a0827-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20986

206 EDAN BEN ELAZAR v. MACRIETTA CLEANERS INC. -- rank: 494

... that the public entity . . . has not been substantially prejudiced thereby." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The motion must be supported by competent evidence demonstrating "sufficient ... accrual, or is permitted to file a late claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8(a). To determine ... permission to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances justified a late claim ...

docket:	a0990-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31778

207 NICOLE DAWSON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES -- rank: 492

... seek permission to file a late notice of claim under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The City raised this defect as a defense in the ...

docket:	a3292-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44957

208 THE ESTATE OF DOUGLAS VAN VALEN v. BOROUGH OF ORADELL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF ORADELL -- rank: 492

... leave to file a notice of late claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which requires a showing of "extraordinary circumstances" justifying the late ...

docket:	a5943-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-20
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	36679

209 RICHARD M. BETTS v. DR. MARGARET NICHOLS, PH.D. -- rank: 489

... A. 59:8-8. Nor did plaintiff seek relief under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 to extend the notice deadline. A-1378-21 15 The ...

docket:	a1378-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29357

210 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2667-20.opn.html -- rank: 487

... 20 4 In limited circumstances, relief can be afforded under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which allows a plaintiff to move for leave to file ... entity [is not] 'substantially prejudiced' thereby.' Id. at 477 (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:8-9). Determining 'extraordinary circumstances' and substantial prejudice requires a 'trial court ...

docket:
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	13839