Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

241 DOUGLAS FALLON v. GEORGE P. BATSIDES M.D. -- rank: 445

... the delay and a lack of prejudice to the State, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, the court had no authority to permit the filing beyond ... of his claim and the second surgery. By its terms N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 "commits the authority to grant a plaintiff's motion for ...

docket:	a0110-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12766

242 ALAN C. NEWMAN v. OCEAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 442

... filed after the statutory limitations period. Pursuant to the statute, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, defendant had until September 21, 2012, to file his complaint ... filed after the two-year period provided by statute. See N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 ("[I]n no event may any suit against a public ...

docket:	a0513-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10063

243 GEORGE W. CRIMMINS v. CITY OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 440

... – as in some circumstances may be permitted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 – had been sought and obtained. As discussed later, the ...

docket:	a5108-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17314

244 SONYA A. VALENTIN v. TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON -- rank: 437

... Education appeals an order granting plaintiff's motion, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, for leave to file a late tort claim notice. We ... so long as the public entity is not "substantially prejudiced." N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The matter is entrusted to the trial court's sound ... appear from the occurrence itself. Although the 1994 amendment to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, as the Court observed in Beauchamp v. Amedio , 164 N ...

docket:	a6366-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9510

245 ESTATE OF JOSEPHINE CORNACCHIO v. ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL -- rank: 435

... J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 12-3, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. We granted leave to appeal an order granting plaintiff's ... notice of claim, but only by order of the court. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The motion to file a late notice of claim must ...

docket:	a2871-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17512

246 MONIQUE CARROWAY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN -- rank: 435

... so within one year of the accrual of the claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Such a request may be granted only if a plaintiff ...

docket:	a6148-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25471

247 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 COURT A-0 STEVEN SCOTT v -- rank: 432

... serve a TCA notice on the basis of exceptional circumstances. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The lack of the required notice bars plaintiff's recovery ...

docket:	a3356-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17490

248 DOMENICK MALINCONICO v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 432

... within one year and "reasonable time" of the due date. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. That discretion is limited to cases in which the claimant ...

docket:	a2316-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	14759

249 RAMONA FRIDAY v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 427

... leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which states: A claimant who fails to file notice of ... in 1994, the Legislature added the "extraordinary circumstances" language to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, its intent was to replace a "fairly permissive standard" with ...

docket:	a2843-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	9386

250 J.D. v. D.R. -- rank: 424

... leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which states: A claimant who fails to file notice of ... in 1994, the Legislature added the "extraordinary circumstances" language to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, its intent was to replace a "fairly permissive standard" with ...

docket:	a0035-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15149

251 JOSE PEREZ v. WARREN A. CHIODO -- rank: 422

... to file a late notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. We reverse and remand for a Lopez1 hearing on all ... leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Despite the many factual issues raised in Perez's and ...

docket:	a1857-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24728

252 TIMOTHY SOPKO et al. v. DENISE SOPKO -- rank: 422

... motion to file a notice of late claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The Schorr firm declined to provide a certification, asserting that ...

docket:	A2104-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-02-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35822

253 DION BASS v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX -- rank: 419

... 208 N.J. 414 , 420 (2011)). Relief is provided through N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which permits "[a]pplication to the court for permission to ...

docket:	a5398-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17694

254 GEORGE PETERS v. SILVERTON VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY NO. 1 -- rank: 419

... A. 59:8-8(a). Although an exception exists under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 allowing a plaintiff to seek leave to file a late ...

docket:	a3498-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38517

255 JUDITH G. RAMOS-LOPEZ v. LUIS A. VARGAS -- rank: 419

... negligence does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance, as defined by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, sufficient to excuse noncompliance with the ninety-day deadline for ... 17T2 4 constitute an 'extraordinary' circumstance within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 59:8- 9, as interpreted by D.D. and O'Donnell. Affirmed. A ...

docket:	a3530-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8438