Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

256 DIANE METZNER v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 419

... years from the time of the accrual of the claim. [ N.J.S.A. 59:8-9.] When a motion to file a late claim is made ...

docket:	a6237-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16535

257 T.L. v. DAVID SCHECK -- rank: 417

... cause of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 alleviates the rigidity of the ninety-day requirement by allowing ...

docket:	a2032-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25900

258 FRANK MARENBACH v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC -- rank: 417

... We perceive no such error. As amended, the applicable statute, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, imposes a heavy burden on a claimant who wishes to ... an order granting leave to file a late notice under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, in a situation where an injured motorcyclist had served his ...

docket:	a6288-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14220

259 CAROL TORRE v. DCH INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. -- rank: 411

... of Claim within the one year statutory period outlined in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Further, the plaintiff has not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances as to ...

docket:	A3102-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71497

260 RAMON TORRES v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 411

... a late notice within the one-year period allowed under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In sum, the motion judge did not err in enforcing ...

docket:	a2993-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10169

261 ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION v. The city of elizabeth, et al. -- rank: 406

... did it move for late filing of notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9." While Judge Barisonek agreed with the Board that it "is ...

docket:	A0090-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	80866

262 TINA KELLY, Executrix et al. v. SOLARIS HEALTH SYSTEMS et al. -- rank: 406

... plaintiff cross-moved to file a late Notice of Claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Defendant's motion was granted on September 9, 2005, prior ...

docket:	a5157-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-05-29
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	43476

263 JENNIE ROSARIO, an individual v. DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES -- rank: 404

... motion to file a late notice of claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. We affirm. A person who seeks relief pursuant to the ... claimant shows sufficient reasons constituting extraordinary circumstances for the delay. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The decision to relax the filing deadline resides in the ...

docket:	a3945-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32095

264 PARKSIDE CAB CORP v. BIDDLE MEDLEY -- rank: 404

... motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, pursuant to the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (the Act ... of "extraordinary circumstances" constituting the basis for the late filing. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. What constitutes "extraordinary circumstances" will be determined on a case ...

docket:	a2268-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26080

265 ROBERT M. DISCH et al. v. THE BOROUGH OF WATCHUNG -- rank: 404

... plaintiffs to file a notice of late claim, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9; (2) an order dated June 4, 2003, denying defendant's ...

docket:	a5379-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-31
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	51420

266 PRISCILLA JOHNSON v. BAYONNE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY -- rank: 401

... allowing plaintiff to file a late notice of tort claim. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. We affirm. I Plaintiff's complaint alleges that on June ... ninety-day time limit set by the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. However, on May 20, 2008, plaintiff retained new counsel, Maurice ... 2, 2008, within the one-year time limit permitted by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. His motion was supported by certifications from Connelly and from ...

docket:	a1764-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-09-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25303

267 MAHESH SWAMINATHAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL -- rank: 396

... to file a late notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 to pursue suit against defendants the State of New Jersey ... of action. N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. However, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 alleviates the rigidity of the ninety-day requirement by authorizing ...

docket:	a5582-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-23
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16850

268 Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds and Reynolds, Co. -- rank: 393

... interpretations of the same phrase used in that statute, see N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, would provide guidance. See Mitchell v. Procini , 331 N.J ...

docket:	a-102-09
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2011-05-18
status:
citation:	207 N.J. 428 25 A.3d 1027
Document Size:	104988

269 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a-102.09.opn.html -- rank: 393

... interpretations of the same phrase used in that statute, see N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, would provide guidance. See Mitchell v. Procini , 331 N.J ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	104515

270 R.T. v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER -- rank: 393

... b) (emphasis added). This statutory limitations period is reaffirmed in N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, which provides in pertinent part that "in no event may ...

docket:	a0467-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27095