Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

286 MICHAEL LAMONT BLACKNALL v. MICHAEL SIMONETTI -- rank: 360

... comply with N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, we also reverse the judgment granted in Simonetti's favor ...

docket:	a2022-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47919

287 ESTATE OF HARRINGTON v. CITY OF LINDEN, -- rank: 357

... alternative for leave to file a late claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The motion judge denied plaintiff's requested relief, finding both ...

docket:	a4113-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-03-26
status:	published
citation:	338 N.J.Super. 500
Document Size:	12572

288 PHILIP HAHN v. FRANK FRASCELLA -- rank: 354

... of tort claim as required by the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The complaint against the doctor, a hospital employee, was similarly ... served a notice of tort claim, without leave of court, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, and filed a second complaint against the underlying defendants based ...

docket:	a0070-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16629

289 GOLDA D. HARRIS v. DYFS, ARC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, And JILL DEITCH -- rank: 352

... notice within the one year window provided by the statute. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. The complaint was dismissed with prejudice on September 9, 2005 ...

docket:	a5068-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-07-11
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	27791

290 ROBERT THIBAULT v. BOROUGH OF HIGHTSTOWN -- rank: 349

... s motion to file a late Notice of Tort Claim, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. In her opinion, Judge Darlene J. Pereksta determined that plaintiff ... or the Borough of Hightstown and the Police Department. Now, [ N.J.S.A. ] 59:8-9 provides that a claimant who fails to file his notice ...

docket:	a0978-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17256

291 MAGALYS GARRIGA v. ROWAN UNIVERSITY -- rank: 349

... delay and (2) the public entity is not substantially prejudiced. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. A claimant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances through affidavits based on ...

docket:	a1353-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-10-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12496

292 PHILIP E. HAHN v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 347

... failed to move for an extension of time pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9, and failed to file his complaint by the two-year ...

docket:	a4799-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	7587

293 DENISE L. BURNS et al. v. MARK L. BELAFSKY, M.D., et al. -- rank: 347

... of claim provisions of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. Ibid. Accordingly, we concluded that “[c]arelessness, lack of circumspection ...

docket:	a0489-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-12-20
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	27480

294 MICHAEL McDADE v. RODOLOFO SIAZON -- rank: 336

... time to file a notice of tort claim pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 is considered a final judgment for purposes of appeal, Rule ...

docket:	a4645-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	23300

295 RYMAN ZAMFT & MANARD VS GERALD R. CORNELL & ET ALS -- rank: 329

... standard is used in cases involving the Tort Claims Act. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 does not define the kind of "extraordinary circumstances" which will ...

docket:	a6860-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	21547

296 RYMAN ZAMFT & MANARD VS GERALD R. CORNELL & ET ALS -- rank: 329

... standard is used in cases involving the Tort Claims Act. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 does not define the kind of "extraordinary circumstances" which will ...

docket:	a6858-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	21547

297 GIOVANNI ASTORINO v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al. -- rank: 329

... is no provision in the TCA permitting equitable tolling. Rather, N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 clearly mandates that "in no event may any suit against ...

docket:	A0003-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32519

298 RYMAN ZAMFT & MANARD VS GERALD R. CORNELL & ET ALS -- rank: 329

... standard is used in cases involving the Tort Claims Act. N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 does not define the kind of "extraordinary circumstances" which will ...

docket:	a6859-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-07
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	21547

299 PHILIP E. HAHN v. THE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY IN NEWARK -- rank: 321

... that notice was untimely, and plaintiff did not move under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 for an extension of time. Plaintiff has not alleged any ...

docket:	a4216-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8009

300 SIDNEY HOLMES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 321

... not filed a timely late claim motion as required by N.J.S.A. 59:8-9. While that motion was pending, plaintiff filed a motion seeking ...

docket:	a3911-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17521