Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

121 CASSANDRA WILTZ v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 533

... expenses also did not exceed the TCA threshold of $3600. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Lastly, the judge determined that none of the State ...

docket:	a4542-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20663

122 KEVIN KELLY v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, -- rank: 533

... of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act's verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2, when sued for damages. While we affirm the dismissal of ... against him, Kelly must vault the verbal threshold contained in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. The trial judge implicitly agreed with this legal contention and ...

docket:	a4178-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-10-12
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 552
Document Size:	55581

123 EDWARD L. GIBSON v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 533

... ordinary negligence plaintiff in proving the nature of the injuries. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) provides in relevant part: No damages shall be awarded ... Novack, Claims Against Public Entities , 1972 Task Force Comment on N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 (Gann 2000)). To recover damages for pain and suffering, a ... medical treatment expenses [were] in excess of $3,600.00." N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Consequently, he cannot pursue a claim for pain and ...

docket:	a1077-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21590

124 CYNTHIA CONLON v. UNION COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT -- rank: 528

... show she suffered substantial and permanent injuries as required under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), and failed to document her lost wage claim. The ... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $ 3,600.00. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] Thus, in order to meet the threshold required to ...

docket:	a3280-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27669

125 DOLORES FRANCHINO v. LYNDHURST RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES TWO, LLC. -- rank: 528

... the requirement for the award of pain and suffering damages. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We find summary judgment was proper since, as a ...

docket:	a5438-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20780

126 MICHAEL POSTORINO v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC -- rank: 528

... 3) he had a permanent loss of a bodily function, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Postorino opposed the motion, contending that the pothole was ...

docket:	a1081-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20555

127 GERTRUDE MOODY et al. v. CITY OF WILDWOOD -- rank: 526

... were sufficiently serious to overcome the Tort Claims Act threshold. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. We disagree with plaintiff's first argument and, therefore, find ...

docket:	A2977-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-01-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39034

128 DENISE SPENTZ v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 526

... not meet the TCA threshold for damages in accordance with N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). The TCA provides: No damages shall be awarded against ... apply in cases of permanent loss of a bodily function . . . . [N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] In rendering his decision, the judge relied on Ponte ... injuries and a substantial loss of a bodily function, satisfying N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo ...

docket:	a5007-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14981

129 SUSAN & ALAN HAMMER VS TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON & ET AL -- rank: 523

... are sufficiently aggravating to meet the criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)." Defendants counter that summary judgment was proper because plaintiff failed to meet the threshold requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).      116 N.J. 55, 59 (1989); see also Brooks ... limitation on the recovery of pain-and-suffering damages under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 Task Force Comment.     Reversed and remanded for trial in conformity ...

docket:	a3593-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-02-18
status:	published
citation:	318 N.J.Super. 298
Document Size:	18880

130 DIONNA TUCKER v. COUNTY OF UNION -- rank: 523

... plaintiff's injury failed to satisfy the injury threshold of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). After considering plaintiff's opposition and hearing oral argument ... any competent evidence of a "permanent loss of bodily function." N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We concur in this determination as well, substantially for ...

docket:	a0522-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22039

131 THERESA J. DEFREESE v. JOHN A. SPIZZIRI -- rank: 520

... also appealed rulings that addressed whether plaintiffs' sustained permanent injuries. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a). We decline to address these issues as defendant's ...

docket:	a5094-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24839

132 Collins v. Union County Jail -- rank: 515

... resulting from any injury' as that phrase is used in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)." Ayers , supra , 106 N.J. at 576. The Court ... that which precipitated plaintiff's injuries. III      We hold that N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) does not immunize Union County from liability for the ... constitutes a "permanent loss of a bodily function" pursuant to N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We leave to the trial court on remand to ...

docket:	a-102-96
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1997-07-15
status:
citation:	150 N.J. 407
Document Size:	21209

133 JEANETTE BUCKLEY v. MAYRA FLEITAS -- rank: 507

... 3. Consequently, Buckley must meet the TCA threshold found at N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 in order to pursue her claim for damages for pain ... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600.00. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2.] In order to establish the permanent loss of a bodily ...

docket:	a1354-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20544

134 CYNTHIA DEVLIN v. JUNIOR LEAGUE OF ELIZABETH-PLAINFIELD -- rank: 507

... plaintiff sustained injuries permitting recovery against a public entity under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). The court also granted defendant's summary judgment motion ...

docket:	a0595-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36448

135 CORA KERTON, v. HUDSON COUNTY, -- rank: 502

... the TCA for a permanent loss of bodily function in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. The judge did not, however, decide whether plaintiff's injuries ...

docket:	a2753-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27148