Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 MONIQUE RAYMOND v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -- rank: 791

... sustained a qualifying permanent loss of a bodily function, under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. Defendants also argued that Dr. Johnson's medical reports failed ... also concluded plaintiff failed to demonstrate a qualifying injury under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. Finally, the court noted it had a 'problem' with plaintiff ...

docket:	a4200-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46427

17 JOSEPH M. SHAY JR., ET AL. VS. HOLMDEL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. VS. LAURA SHAY, ET AL. -- rank: 789

... ruling that plaintiff established a substantial permanent bodily injury under N.J.S.A. 59:9- 2(d). A-1289-22 4 We have considered these arguments ... plaintiff failed to meet the injury threshold set forth in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), by not supplying objective medical evidence of a permanent ...

docket:	a1289-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-05-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22349

18 D.D v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 786

... permanency entitling the claimant to pain and suffering damages under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)), the plaintiff's attorney in Beauchamp advised the plaintiff ...

docket:	a5676-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61715

19 D.D v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 786

... permanency entitling the claimant to pain and suffering damages under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)), the plaintiff's attorney in Beauchamp advised the plaintiff ...

docket:	a5418-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61715

20 MAEGAN STALLINGS V DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION -- rank: 781

... lawsuits only where specifically delineated. Within the Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(c) provides that “[n]o punitive or exemplary damages ...

docket:	009002-23
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28646

21 ELSIE LASCURAIN v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE, et al. -- rank: 778

... distress claim under the Tort Claims Act, we note that N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 bars recovery for pain and suffering, absent evidence of "loss ...

docket:	A1438-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-03-12
status:	published
citation:	353 N.J. Super. 475 793 A.2d 731
Document Size:	92195

22 C.W.,1 v. ROSELLE BOARD OF EDUCATION, -- rank: 776

... law. State v. Knight, 145 N.J. 233, 249 (1996). N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) is clear and unambiguous on its face that the ... plaintiff contends he has satisfied the medical expense threshold under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). He further asserts that barring a plaintiff in a ... c). Plaintiff contends he met the medical expense threshold under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). He asserts that because Dr. Conte concluded plaintiff 'will ... both current and future medical expenses that exceed $3,600. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) provides: No damages shall be awarded against a public ... that the plaintiff's common-law claims were barred under N.J.S.A. 59:9- 2(d) because he did not meet the medical expense threshold ... a child who is sexually molested meets the requirement of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) regarding a permanent loss of a bodily function ...

docket:	a3187-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-21
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	26251

23 BRIANNA ACKERMAN v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 770

... plaintiff failed to meet the injury threshold set forth in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) by supplying objective medical evidence of a permanent loss ...

docket:	a5108-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46836

24 ANGELA PRESTOL v. HENPAL REALTY ASSOCIATES LLC -- rank: 770

... emotional distress and pain and suffering were bar red by N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) because plaintiff's injuries did not constitute a 'permanent ... quod claim because he did not meet the requirements in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 as he produced no evidence of a therapist or other ...

docket:	a0633-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53143

25 Halina Jablonowska v. David P. Suther -- rank: 768

... we held that the verbal threshold provision of the TCA, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), did not bar a recovery for pain and suffering ... treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600.00.” N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). In Collins , supra , the plaintiff’s treating psychologist testified ... permanent loss of a bodily function’ within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).” Id. at 420. In reaching that conclusion, we ...

docket:	a-9-07
court:
decided:	2008-06-10
status:
citation:	195 N.J. 91
Document Size:	140825

26 Pamela O’Donnell v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority -- rank: 765

... not appear serious enough” to recover non-economic damages under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Ibid. Recognizing that the attorney’s confusion was derived ...

docket:	a-69-17
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2018-01-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	52010

27 JANE DOE v. RICHARD BURKE -- rank: 755

... the prosecutor and Attorney General in their individual capacities. See N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(c) (providing no punitive damages 'shall be awarded against a ...

docket:	a4920-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60018

28 VINCENT LAQUIDARA v. WESTWOOD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT -- rank: 752

... Distress Claim[]. B. Vincent Cannot Vault the Injury Threshold Under [ N.J.S.A.] 59:9-2 To Support a Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim. C ... Donaldson, 470 N.J. Super. 41, 55 (App. Div. 2021)). N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) provides: No damages shall be awarded against a public ... 396 N.J. Super. 1, 20 (App. Div. 2007) (citing N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)). Vincent failed to submit proof of medical bills exceeding ...

docket:	a2829-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48804

29 LISA M. ROSE v. ESTATE OF PETER P RIVA -- rank: 744

... the plaintiff failed to meet the TCA's verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). In reversing, we limited our holding to those two ...

docket:	a0709-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38148

30 MARC J. MIGNANO v. JIM SULLIVAN, INC. -- rank: 742

... proceeds would be deemed a collateral source of recovery under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e), thereby reducing the damages payable by the Township and ...

docket:	a2995-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	125617