Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 LAURENCE ROTHSCHILD v. TOWNSHIP OF PARSIPPANY TROY HILLS -- rank: 666

... mental and emotional A-0735-22 4 pain and suffering. . . . N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) states that: 'No damages shall be awarded against a ... alternate basis—specifically, plaintiffs' failure to present injuries cognizable under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Because this issue was not raised or argued by ...

docket:	a0735-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39633

62 BRIANNA PEREZ v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 664

... 139. At trial, the plaintiff argued the verbal threshold of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) did not apply to his damage claims because the ... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600.00. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] Notwithstanding her claims of permanent disfigurement and permanent psychological ... part on other grounds , 192 N.J. 137 (2007). 6 N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) provides: No damages shall be awarded against a public ...

docket:	a2932-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40149

63 NICKOLAS D'ANGELO v. DAWN MOYLAN, VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK - -- rank: 664

... including prosthetic devices and ambulance, hospital or professional nursing service. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) (emphasis added).] In addition to presenting evidence of "medical ... expenses" that both exceed $3600 and meet the definition under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), a plaintiff seeking to recover pain and suffering damages ... trial court's dismissal of a plaintiff's claims under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) because the plaintiff could still function in both her ...

docket:	a0187-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42194

64 LEAH ANDUJAR, v. TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK BOARD OF EDUCATION, -- rank: 661

... for the Board after analyzing plaintiff's damages claim under N.J.S.A 59:9-2(d). In his thoughtful and comprehensive oral decision, Judge Militello ... of permanent loss of bodily function or permanent disfigurement under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Plaintiff appealed. II. We review the trial court's ... Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995)). N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), the relevant section of the TCA, reads in pertinent ... 403. In addition, plaintiff's medical expenses must exceed $3600. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). '[I]n order to be considered a permanent disfigurement ... trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claims under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) because the plaintiff could still function in both her ... substantial loss of a bodily function or permanent disfigurement under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). In her chief merits brief, plaintiff attempts to ...

docket:	a2414-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-01-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17047

65 Cavuoti v. New Jersey Transit Corporation -- rank: 661

... or exemplary damages shall be awarded against a public entity." N.J.S.A. 59:9-2. Nothing in the LAD expressly or impliedly repeals that provision ...

docket:	a-17-98
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-08-10
status:
citation:	161 N.J. 107
Document Size:	82971

66 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5568-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 658

... 39:6A-9.1 is limited by the restrictions of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) if the tortfeasor is a public entity or public ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	65068

67 MEHERALY MERCHANT v. BRIAN J. VINDICK -- rank: 658

... 39:6A-9.1 is limited by the restrictions of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) if the tortfeasor is a public entity or public ...

docket:	a3822-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	65698

68 Catherine P. Gilhooley v. County of Union -- rank: 656

... to justify the award of pain and suffering damages under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). I.     In 1994, plaintiff, Catherine Gilhooley, was employed as ... Gilhooley's scar did not constitute a permanent disfigurement under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).     We granted Mrs. Gilhooley's petition for certification. 163 ... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $1,000.00.                  [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] Unlike a lawsuit against a private entity in which ... Novack, Claims Against Public Entities , 1972 Task Force Comment on N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 (Gann 2000).] That is the statutory scheme against which the ... permanent loss of a bodily function” within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).         [150 N.J. at 406.] IV.         The question before ...

docket:	a-56-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-07-11
status:
citation:	164 N.J. 533
Document Size:	42086

69 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 HABITATE, LLC and THOMAS MA -- rank: 645

... of count five is affirmed. 1 Bridgeton points out that N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 bars punitive damages claim against a municipality. We agree. In ...

docket:	a2296-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46179

70 CHILD T.R.C. v. HARRISON IN DISTRICT DAY SCHOOL -- rank: 645

... as a 'permanent loss of bodily function' as required by N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) of the Tort Claims Act ('TCA'), N.J.S ... because we are restricting our decision to the issues involving N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). A-2343-21 5 interrogatories and admissions on file ... provide objective evidence of a 'substantial' impairment to vault the N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) threshold. Gilhooley, 164 N.J. at 540-41. Whether ...

docket:	a2343-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20611

71 RAY WATERS v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER OCEAN COUNTY - -- rank: 643

... claim for relief is barred by the anti-subrogation provision, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e), of the Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S ... an insurance contract against a public entity or public employee. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e).] An insurer cannot "through subrogation, effect a recovery" from ... entity that could not be obtained as a result of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e)'s anti-subrogation clause. Hayes , supra , 269 N.J ... cannot countenance such a scenario. The anti-subrogation provisions of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) do not apply here. This appeal involves the interpretation ...

docket:	a4706-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39147

72 J.H. v. MERCER COUNTY YOUTH DETENTION CENTER and COUNTY OF MERCER -- rank: 640

... Super. 320 , 323 (App. Div. 1989). III. We now examine N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 to see if that provision's "limitation on judgment" bars ... defendants. We are satisfied based on its express language that N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 bars an award of damages against the County defendants on ...

docket:	a3637-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-29
status:	published
citation:	396 N.J. Super. 1
Document Size:	74825

73 DelaCruz v. Borough of Hillsdale -- rank: 638

... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600.00. [ N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] It is admitted that, if the verbal threshold applies ... imprisonment claims do not vault the verbal threshold requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Our reading of N.J.S.A. 59:3 ...

docket:	a-72-03
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2005-04-12
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	67192

74 KRYSTAL DUTCHER v. PHILLIPSBURG HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 632

... had not suffered a permanent loss of bodily function under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) and that defendant cannot be liable for a "negligent ... permanent loss of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement or dismemberment[.]" N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Thus, in order to defeat a motion for summary ...

docket:	a0639-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21302

75 TOBY WELLINGTON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 630

... for] medical treatment' exceed the minimum statutory threshold provided under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). The court found that although plaintiff had established that ... the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), commonly referred to as the 'verbal threshold' of the ... the medical treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600. [N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d).] The verbal threshold is not a grant of immunity ... limitation on the recovery of pain and suffering damages [in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)].'). To vault the threshold, '[a] plaintiff must show '(1 ... evidence of a substantial impairment in order to meet the N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) threshold. Gilhooley, 164 N.J. at 540. '[No]t ...

docket:	a2781-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-12
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24453