Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0132-10red.opn.html -- rank: 630

... with respect to a public entity or employee," and with N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a), which declares that "[n]o interest shall accrue prior ... claims it is a public entity within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a) and, thus, plaintiff was not entitled to prejudgment interest ... of Lieberman , other provisions of the Tort Claims Act, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a), should in fairness apply. In Dorn , we held that applying N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a) to the Transport of New Jersey, when no other ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34753

77 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/acted-10.opn.html -- rank: 630

... with respect to a public entity or employee," and with N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a), which declares that "[n]o interest shall accrue prior ... claims it is a public entity within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a) and, thus, plaintiff was not entitled to prejudgment interest ... of Lieberman , other provisions of the Tort Claims Act, specifically N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a), should in fairness apply. In Dorn , we held that applying N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(a) to the Transport of New Jersey, when no other ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34744

78 ERCILIA ROJAS v. AC OCEAN WALK, LLC -- rank: 627

... 150 N.J. 395, 406 (1997) (holding that to satisfy N.J.S.A. 59:9- 2(d), 'a plaintiff must sustain a permanent loss of the ... Court held the plaintiff had met the threshold set by N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). 171 N.J. at 5–6. What plaintiff A ...

docket:	a0747-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-11-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20088

79 TERESA A. OHLWEILER V. TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM -- rank: 622

... evidence of permanency to the injury she sustained. Furthermore, while N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) would not have prevented plaintiff from recovering unreimbursed medical ... particularly since her injury was covered by workers' compensation. See N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e); Ortega v. State , 2l3 N.J. Super. l6 (App. Div. l986) (under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e), public entity defendant was entitled to have the entire ...

docket:	a370-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-17
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 399
Document Size:	22113

80 LOUELLA FRISON v. A-1 LIMOUSINE, INC. -- rank: 614

... whether Frison's injuries were compensable under the TCA. See N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d); Gilhooley v. Cty. of Union, 164 N.J. 533 ...

docket:	a0763-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31021

81 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0426-21.opn.html -- rank: 614

... Because the judge misapplied the summary judgment standard and misinterpreted N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e), we reverse. We derive the following facts from evidence ... benefits from any damage award against a public entity. See N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e). A-0426-21 5 In this ensuing appeal, plaintiff ... 2(c). A-0426-21 7 Furthermore, the judge misconstrued N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) as precluding Salmond from presenting evidence of or seeking recovery for her unpaid medical bills. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) provides: If a claimant receives or is entitled to ... see also Margolis & Novack, Claims Against Public Entities, cmt. to N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) (2022) (noting that not 'present[ing] evidence regarding damages ... receive from collateral sources for their injuries to the court. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e). Thus, Salmond is not precluded from presenting evidence ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16274

82 TIMOTHY ROEHRICH v. JAMES M. MULLIN -- rank: 606

... involves application of the Tort Claims Act (TCA) verbal threshold. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). On January 7, 2012, defendant James M. Mullin, an ... had not suffered a "permanent loss of a bodily function." N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Defendants contended Roehrich failed to establish his injuries resulted ... limitation on the recovery of pain and suffering damages [in N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)]."). 2 To vault the threshold, a plaintiff "must show ...

docket:	a2565-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31398

83 ELIZABETH R. SCHREIBER, ET AL. VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ET AL. -- rank: 606

... v. Twp. of Middletown, 154 N.J. 282, 286 (1998)). N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) provides '[n]o damages shall be awarded against a ... of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement or dismemberment.' To satisfy N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) a plaintiff A-1760-22 7 must show '(1 ... and are insufficient to maintain a cause of action under N.J.S.A. 59:9- 2(d). To the extent we have not addressed any of ...

docket:	a1760-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-05-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17674

84 ANTONIO CHAPARRO NIEVES v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER -- rank: 601

... the TCA's limitation on recovery for pain and suffering, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)—sometimes referred to as the TCA's verbal ... expenses that can be counted towards the verbal threshold. See N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Thus, Nieves has failed to meet that requirement. In addition to incurring the threshold for medical expenses, $3600, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d), Nieves was required to establish, by objective medical evidence ...

docket:	a4475-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13863

85 ANA GARCIA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT -- rank: 593

... to 12-3) threshold for recovery of non-economic damages. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We affirm. The facts are undisputed and may be ... citing DiProspero v. Penn , 183 N.J. 477 , 482 (2005)). N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) sets forth the following limits on recovery of pain ... Novack, Claims Against Public Entities , 1972 Task Force Comment on N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 (Gann 2000)). In Gilhooley , supra , the Court held that in ...

docket:	a4936-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22240

86 GRACE AYBAR VS NEW JERSEY TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC. ET AL -- rank: 593

... the plan's beneficiaries could not obtain in light of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e)'s anti-subrogation clause. Id. at 455. See footnote ... cases.     We, therefore, affirm the trial judge's conclusion that N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e)'s anti-subrogation provision is preempted by 5 U ... plans in a practical way."). Footnote: 6 In this respect, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(e) provides, in addition to its anti-subrogation clause:         If ...

docket:	a7575-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-10-14
status:	published
citation:	305 N.J.Super. 32
Document Size:	32674

87 Knowles v. Mantua Township -- rank: 591

... more subjective and less certain than economic damages. See Comment, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 (describing pain and suffering as “non-objective” type of damage ...

docket:	a-128-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2003-05-29
status:
citation:	176 N.J. 324
Document Size:	44110

88 BERNO A. CHALET v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 591

... or exemplary damages does not lie against a public entity. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(c). This limitation specifically applies to common law negligence claims ...

docket:	a1738-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26876

89 STEVEN KOWALESKI v. GEORGE WOLFF MORRIS-UNION JOINTURE COMMISSION -- rank: 591

... medical treatment expenses are in excess of $3,600.00." N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). A substantial permanent psychological injury may qualify as a ... permanent loss of a bodily function' within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)."). A diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder requires expert ... permanent. Therefore, plaintiffs were unable to satisfy the requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d) and defendants were entitled to summary judgment as a ...

docket:	a5173-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30627

90 NINA PAGAN v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 591

... bodily function, permanent disfigurement or dismemberment" because of the attack. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d); Brooks v. Odom , 150 N.J. 395 (1997). The ... its employees, and the injuries she suffered were cognizable under N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). We have considered these arguments in light of the ... whether plaintiff's claimed injuries vaulted the threshold requirements of N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Affirmed. 1 Plaintiff essentially conceded this point at oral ...

docket:	a3296-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18799