Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:2-4")   136 to 150 of 399 results. Run time: 0.911 seconds | Search time: 0.904 seconds    
 Page:1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 27 Previous 15 Next 15
136 TUHIN PANDYA v. ROOPAL SHAH -- rank: 592
... the trial judge reviewed the fourteen factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 to determine what was in the best interest of A ... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).' Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] When 'the parents cannot agree to a custody arrangement ... custody plan which the court shall consider in awarding custody.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(e). Lastly, when making 'any custody arrangement not agreed to ... place on the record the factors which justify' its order. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). '[T]he decision concerning the type of custody arrangement ... determinations, the hearing judge considered each factor set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The judge referenced the extensive record which provided ...
docket: a4546-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-04-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28871
137 MICHAEL P. HRYCAK v. RITA HRYCAK -- rank: 592
... his analysis, the judge carefully tracked the statutory factors of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The following excerpts from the judge's custody ruling capture ... has elaborated upon this best-interest standard by prescribing in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) thirteen non-exclusive factors to be considered by the ... Div.), certif. denied , 142 N.J. 571 (1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). We are unpersuaded ...
docket: a3645-08
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-10-01
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 82689
138 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2106-18.opn.html -- rank: 592
... judge never addressed the statutory best interests' factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 prior to modifying the DSA, and the judge exerted duress ... ied] any custody arrangement not agreed to by both parents.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; see also Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 62397
139 T.O v. J.P -- rank: 592
... trial court's findings and argues that the court misapplied N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in making the custody award. We disagree and affirm ... S.C., analyzed the child custody factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). See Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102 ... s findings, and further argues that the trial judge misapplied N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[I]t is a well-settled principle that our ... A court should consider several factors in determining custody arrangements. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[U]nder a joint custody arrangement[,] legal custody â ... determine to be in the best interests of the child.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We review A-4208-18 7 the Family Part ... conclude that the trial judge erred in his application of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We find no merit in the appeal as ...
docket: a4208-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16286
140 KIMBERLY LANZANA v. STEPHAN DEBELLE DUPLAN -- rank: 589
... rights to share in the parenting of the child. Cf. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (noting that parents have equal rights to custody of child ... 272 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 75 N.J. 28 (1977); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Just as fear or resistance would have tended to support ...
docket: a2183-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 75958
141 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.T and C.C IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF AM.T., J.T and AL.T Minors -- rank: 589
... without a "best interests" hearing. See i bid. ; see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (setting forth factors the court must consider in making child ...
docket: a4982-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 93164
142 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3010-19.opn.html -- rank: 589
... pursuant to court order, and the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 before he entered the emergent order. 4 The evidence the ... ability to agree, communicate, or cooperate in these [custody] 4 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 provides: In making an award of custody, the court shall ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 52357
143 N.D v. M.D. -- rank: 587
... After considering all of the relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded defendant sole legal custody of the children ...
docket: a5748-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-11-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37988
144 N.D v. M.D. -- rank: 587
... After considering all of the relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded defendant sole legal custody of the children ...
docket: a6022-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-11-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37988
145 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2058-18.opn.html -- rank: 585
... dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4,8 unless the Title Thirty action involves an out-of ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 54188
146 T.N.T. v. A.R.G. -- rank: 585
... New Jersey courts should apply the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, thereby effectuating the legislative intent. Terry , supra , 270 N.J ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [ N.J.S.A.  9:2-4(c).] As a general proposition, a trial court's obligation ... we have no doubt that he considered and applied the N.J.S.A.  9:2-4(c) factors in awarding sole custody. The court expressly stated ...
docket: a2804-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-09-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28804
147 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. H.V., SR -- rank: 585
... that visitation would be in the child's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b. The trial judge denied visitation until defendant made a ... child endangering conviction, Henry was prohibited from visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...
docket: a4736-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-04-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32811
148 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. G.V. -- rank: 585
... an FN action agree to a judicial custody determination under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, they may not later protest the procedures followed). The record ...
docket: a2095-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-01-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51273
149 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0262-20.opn.html -- rank: 582
... the child's best interests. Plaintiff also argues that under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the trial court did not properly consider the FRO ... the court properly set forth its findings under all fourteen N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors in the underlying oral record and in his ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25779
150 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3230-14a3256-14.opn.html -- rank: 582
... 1984), certif. denied, 99 N.J. 243 (1985); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (declaring it to be the State's public purpose 'to ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 45714
 Page:1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 27 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!