Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

151 LAUREN KREMPER v. JEFFREY KREMPER -- rank: 582

... of the child' standard, considering the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Most significantly, the judge found that the parties experienced ... preferences. Additionally, defendant contends the trial judge improperly cited to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, asserting that the statute is only relevant in custody proceedings ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] Based on our review of the record, we reject ... schedule, and in making this determination, erred in relying on N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. As to defendant's challenge to the use of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, while the statute states that the factors are to be ... it was not incorrect for the trial judge to consider N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in determining the best interests of the parties' children. ...

docket:	a1177-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22138

152 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. M.F. -- rank: 582

... in a hearing in which she sought visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, and that her counsel provided ineffective assistance. The Division ... the Law Guardian's motion to suspend visitation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1. 4 M.F. did not move to reinstate visitation ... visitation between M.F. and David. The argument ignores that N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b prohibits visitation to those convicted of child endangerment in ... child for such custody or visitation rights to be awarded. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2.4-1b.] 5 The Supreme Court held in N.J. Div ...

docket:	a0786-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37519

153 L.R v. E.D -- rank: 580

... unresolved. Certainly, no prior evaluation was conducted in accordance with N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 prior to the evidentiary hearing. Admittedly, changes in parenting time ... it fails to satisfactorily comport with the statutory factors of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The judge's opinion demonstrates a reasoned weighing of ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...

docket:	a2462-14
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	44575

154 MELISSA FISHER v. GREGORY SZCZYGLOWSKI -- rank: 580

... v. Sacharow , 177 N.J. 62 , 80 (2003); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. This "best interests of the child" standard is, at its ... minor children of frequent and continuing contact with both parents[.]" N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. We turn to the mother's arguments on appeal. The ... failed to consider and apply the fourteen custody factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), warranting reversal. These factors are: [1] the parents' ability ... either parent is unfit, as that term is defined by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The child is too young to express any preference ... from engaging in harassing communications. One of the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) is the geographical proximity of the parents' homes. The ...

docket:	a2768-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37537

155 MARY ATHERHOLT v. MICHAEL R. HUNTER -- rank: 580

... FOR OR ANALYZE THE STATUTORY CUSTODY FACTORS SET FORTH IN [ N.J.S.A. ] 9:2-4. IX. THE PLAINTIFF HAD SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY OF THE MINOR ... hearing and consider all of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Beck , supra , 86 N.J. at 489. What occurred on ... consider or analyze all of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a plenary hearing before ...

docket:	a4987-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23483

156 CASSANDRA R. TERRY v. RICHARD S. TERRY -- rank: 580

... determination after carefully reviewing each statutory consideration for determining custody. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). In addition, the court found significant to the children ...

docket:	a4469-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	42848

157 COURTOF T.F v. T.M.L -- rank: 577

... court erred by failing to consider the custody factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), 4 before denying her motion for custody, contending the ... by a consideration of all of the custody factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), warrants reversal of the November 30, 2015 order. "A ... hearing, the court shall consider each of the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). See V.C. v. M.J.B. , 163 N ... interests standard giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 "), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 926, 121 S. Ct. 302 ... 7.3(c)(4). 4 The fourteen custody factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) are: [1] [T]he parents' ability to agree, communicate ...

docket:	a1964-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27667

158 D.D v. T.L. -- rank: 577

... were changed circumstances and analyzed each factor as required under N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4(c). He concluded that: (1) [p]laintiff has drastically failed ... N.J. Super. 514, 522 (App. Div. 2006). In addition, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) requires a trial court to consider fourteen enumerated factors ...

docket:	a3181-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34901

159 DANIEL HUDSPITH v. BRITTANY FROYSLAND -- rank: 575

... in N.J.S.A. 9:2-44 and 4 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 enumerates the following custody factors: (1) the parents’ ability to ... consideration: POINT ONE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY RELYING ON N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 AS A BASIS TO DETERMINE THE SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ISSUE. POINT ... App. Div. 1978). The best interests factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 are not limited to initial custody awards. They have been ... We discern no error in considering the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in determining whether enrollment in Riverview or St. Therese is ...

docket:	a1187-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32143

160 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 DANIELLE DELORENZO-TAGLIA n -- rank: 575

... for findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and direct the trial court to apply the best interests ... change of custody case. 4 We decline to do so. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 applies to an initial custody determination where the court must ... case, not an initial or change in custody case. Accordingly, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and the best interests of the child standard do not ...

docket:	a2353-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39184

161 P.V.P v. F.J.C -- rank: 575

... determining custody in accordance with the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 (2017). 'A ... was required to do, the statutory factors regarding custody. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (requiring judge to consider 'the parents' ability to . . . communicate[,]' and ...

docket:	a1966-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-06-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36107

162 W.M v. D.G -- rank: 575

... parents have an equal right to custody of their child. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Unlike a child's legal parents, third parties, such as ...

docket:	a3097-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-14
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37958

163 STEPHANIE MESSNER v. MIKLOS HAJDU-NEMETH -- rank: 573

... determining custody in accordance with the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 (2017). The ... to properly apply the child custody factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Plaintiff argues that defendant was violating a court order and ... judge did not properly apply each custody factor pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, but instead only 'read through' them, is also clearly contradicted ...

docket:	a5607-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27274

164 JAIME TAORMINA BISBING v. GLENN R. BISBING, III, -- rank: 573

... time, usually three to five years. A-0138-20 2 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and other relevant considerations. We need only repeat what is ...

docket:	a0138-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-07
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	32419

165 COLLEEN KNIGHT v. CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT -- rank: 570

... With New Jersey Court [ Rule ] 1:7-4(a) And [ N.J.S.A. ] 9:2-4(f) 2. The Factual Findings And Legal Conclusions Of The ... With New Jersey Court [ Rule ] 1:7-4(a) And [ N.J.S.A. ] 9:2-4(f) 2. The Factual Findings And Legal Conclusions Of The ... legal conclusions of law. See R. 1:7-4(a); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). We disagree. Defendant bore the burden to prove changed ...

docket:	a6239-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18399