Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:2-4")   166 to 180 of 400 results. Run time: 0.767 seconds | Search time: 0.760 seconds    
 Page:1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 27 Previous 15 Next 15
166 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. C.M and Z.F IN THE MATTER OF X.F S.J AND Z.M -- rank: 568
... the issue here were simply the issue of custody under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 with the best interest[s] of the child standard [to ...
docket: a2703-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2010-11-19
status:
citation:
Document Size: 33897
167 RODRICK L. HAMPTON v. JENNIFER P. CASSESE -- rank: 568
... Beck , supra , 86 N.J. at 486-87. See also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a)(2) (listing consultation between the parents with joint custody ... plaintiff; yet legally he has every right to receive them. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a)(2). Plaintiff also certified the Mother's Day dispute ... best left solely to the residential parent's discretion. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a). Many variables impact such an evaluation, including a parent ...
docket: a5548-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 51002
168 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0503-20.opn.html -- rank: 565
... defendant's cross-motion for custody. The court discussed each N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 factor then concluded with: So, I have three of the ... appeal, plaintiff argues the court misapplied the relocation factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and erred in not interviewing the child. We agree. Our ... should apply the best interests analysis to determine 'cause' under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in all relocation disputes where parents share legal custody. Bisbing, 230 N.J. at 335. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) provides the statutory factors for a best interests analysis ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 33534
169 C.O v. K.G and U.O -- rank: 565
... determining custody in accordance with the best interests standard of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 322 (2017) (citing ... J. 480, 496 n.8 (1981)). A-0181-20 8 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) sets out the statutory factors for a best interests ... unresolved factual issues and no application or analysis of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors. Moreover, the record is barren of any discussion ...
docket: a0181-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-04-13
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26053
170 TUHIN PANDYA v. ROOPAL SHAH -- rank: 563
... the trial judge reviewed the fourteen factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4 to determine what was in the best interest of A ...
docket: a0445-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-30
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25876
171 B.H.M. v. L.E.P.-M. -- rank: 563
... and parents share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Where parents disagree on custody and parenting time, the court ... the child, specifically, by considering the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in making a custody and parenting time award. The ...
docket: a1751-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61565
172 J.A.D. v. M.A.I. -- rank: 563
... in analyzing the best interests of the child factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Defendant also asserts the trial court erred in ordering ... be presumed to be protected by the adversarial process.' Ibid. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) provides factors for a court to use in its ...
docket: a1179-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-05-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31439
173 REBECCA JUSTICE v. PHILLIP MARINO -- rank: 563
... hearing argument from both parties, the court made findings under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and, based on the prior record, granted defendant's ... who entered the March 2019 order made adequate findings under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. A decision to vacate under Rule 4:50-1 lies ...
docket: a5520-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13681
174 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1493-20.opn.html -- rank: 561
... case under the best interests of the child standard in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. It found that defendant 'failed to demonstrate . . . there is a ... THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD STANDARD, SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, OUTWEIGHS DEFENDANT'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION. POINT ... A court should consider several factors in determining custody arrangements. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). '[U]nder a joint custody arrangement, legal custody â ... determine to be in the best interests of the child.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). We review the Family Part judge's determination to ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 49810
175 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5362-17.opn.html -- rank: 561
... just.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, a court may enter an order establishing joint custody, sole ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 57668
176 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2587-16.opn.html -- rank: 561
... child standard, 'giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.' Id. at 227-28. Here, Judge Harris held that plaintiff ... custody and related issues, giving weight to the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. V.C., 163 N.J. at 227-28. Therefore, in ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] Here, the judge considered these factors and found that ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 34646
177 ORSOLYA CSAK v. ATTILA KUCZORA -- rank: 558
... plaintiff in the best possible light.' Rather than analyze the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors, the expert 'focused on the bonding of . . . plaintiff ... their lives if not addressed.' The trial judge analyzed the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors. He found plaintiff struggled to communicate, agree, and ... the sufficiency of the trial judge's analysis of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors. She asserts the court decided the case based ... of the record shows the judge addressed each of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors and made findings regarding those, which favored an ...
docket: a1149-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-10-28
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28261
178 A.F. v. D.L.P., -- rank: 558
... 16, citing N.J.S.A. 9:2-3 and N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The Court also found, as did a majority in the ...
docket: a6766-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-04-20
status: published
citation: 339 N.J. Super. 312
Document Size: 35537
179 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2329-20.opn.html -- rank: 556
... COURT FAILED TO MAKE THE REQUIRED FACT-FINDINGS PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(C) AND (F). POINT III THE TRIAL COURT’S ORDER ... justify any custody arrangement not agreed to by both parents.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). Relevant factors include: the parents’ ability to agree, communicate ... parents’ conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [(N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)).] In making its determination regarding custody, the court's ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 18487
180 SHANTELE STEWART v. SHANDON A. WILLEY -- rank: 556
... written opinion. The judge analyzed the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and determined that it was in the child's best ... INTERNET DISPLAYS AND UNSTABLE HOME ENVIRONMENT IN ITS ANALYSIS UNDER N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 AND IN DRAWING THE CONCLUSION THAT STEWART WAS A FIT ... TO SOLICIT HER PERSONAL OPINIONS ON THE STATUTORY FACTORS UNDER N.J.S.A. 9:2 4. POINT FIVE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING WILLEY'S ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.] Joint legal custody is preferred when feasible because it is ... case, the judge thoroughly analyzed the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The court also considered additional criteria: A. Each parent['s ...
docket: a2293-13
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-05
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 41395
 Page:1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 27 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!