Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 S.M v. R.R.C. -- rank: 556

... Beck v. Beck, 86 N.J. 480, 501 (1981) (quoting N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; Lavene v. Lavene, 148 N.J. Super. 267, 271 (App ...

docket:	a1020-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30716

182 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.W. -- rank: 553

... termination, although not determinative by itself, is also indicated by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b. That statute provides that a person convicted of endangering ... child for such custody and visitation rights to be awarded." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b. Although section "c" of that statute provides that a ... the parental rights of the person denied visitation or custody," N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.2c, it is a factor that the trial judge may ...

docket:	A3112-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	106498

183 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.B.B. -- rank: 553

... termination, although not determinative by itself, is also indicated by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b. That statute provides that a person convicted of endangering ... child for such custody and visitation rights to be awarded." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b. Although section "c" of that statute provides that a ... the parental rights of the person denied visitation or custody," N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.2c, it is a factor that the trial judge may ...

docket:	A3110-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	106499

184 R.R v. V.R. -- rank: 553

... in failing to address the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and in declining to interview the children. We disagree ... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)." Hand , supra , 391 N.J. Super. at 105. Although the trial court did not specifically reference N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the trial court adequately addressed the relevant statutory factors ...

docket:	a1228-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45301

185 J.M v. J.R -- rank: 553

... 200, 215-28 (holding that visitation is presumptive subject to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 A-2953-08T2 9 considerations), cert. denied, 531 U.S ... will need to fully consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, as well as applicable case law, in determining what custody ...

docket:	a2953-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28213

186 P.T. v. A.T. -- rank: 551

... v. Fantony, 21 N.J. 525, 536 (1956); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) (setting forth a non-exhaustive list of relevant factors ...

docket:	a3932-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39400

187 BARRY FIELDS v. SAMANTHA RICHARDS -- rank: 551

... C. , 215 N.J. Super. 132 , 140 (Ch. Div. 1986); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. In reaching its best interests determination, the trial court must ...

docket:	a5507-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	70711

188 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. D.G. -- rank: 551

... time. In making its determination, the family court analyzed the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 best-interests factors. In G.M. , supra , we recognized that ... best-interests analysis that employed the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, which is commonly used in a variety of family matters ... the judge did not expressly delineate the discrete factors of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4's best interests' paradigm, and he did not order the ...

docket:	a1709-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47351

189 JOHN ORR v. SYLVANNAH ORR -- rank: 551

... mediation, and substantively analyze the custody factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Third, he maintains the court erroneously concluded he acted ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] When parents cannot agree on a custody arrangement, '[t ... record the factors which justify' the custody arrangement it reached. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). '[T]he articulation of reasons by the trial court ... the best A-0579-20 16 interest factors delineated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in the event it determines a modification of the ...

docket:	a0579-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-10-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32425

190 J.P. v. L.P. -- rank: 549

... Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 338 (2017) (citing N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)). The statutory factors include: the parents' ability to agree ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] Against that legal backdrop, we turn to the facts ... considered that factor because it is not expressly stated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Plaintiff seeks a plenary hearing to resolve the factual ... is one factor to consider in the best interests analysis. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). But, there is no authority to support the judge ... 3(e)(1)(E). We simply note as stated above, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) expressly permits the Family Part to consider other factors ...

docket:	a1553-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16965

191 KAREN L. DIMACALE v. LUISITO DIMACALE -- rank: 549

... urged the court to apply the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Plaintiff again asserted that defendant failed to adequately communicate, citing ...

docket:	a1823-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	58994

192 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. C.N and L.C., A.H., D.L., and J.R -- rank: 549

... the fitness of the parents, and the child's preferences. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). While a child's preferences must be considered by ...

docket:	a0272-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23247

193 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/madison-v-davis.opn.html -- rank: 546

... supports the concept of parents sharing joint legal custody under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and having 'equal rights and equal responsibilities regarding the care ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44613

194 M.I v. B.I. -- rank: 546

... responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Both parties here have a fundamental right to "the custody ... 479 (Ch. Div. 1997)) (internal quotation mark omitted). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, a judge determining custody shall consider the following factors: the ...

docket:	a2935-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26609

195 DEVON MCINTOSH v. PHANIE MORRIS -- rank: 544

... of the child' standard, considering the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- - 4(c). Most significantly, the judge recognized the child's age ... parenting time, and in making this determination, erred in applying N.J.S.A . 9:2-4. Defendant also contends the judge's factual finding of changed ... provision violates the child's best interests as outlined in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Further, defendant argues that even if plaintiff made a prima ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] Applying these principles, we discern no abuse of discretion ... hearing violates the child's best interests as outlined in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. We disagree. The record shows no reported incidents of any ...

docket:	a3081-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16857