Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

241 F.S v. R.A.L -- rank: 505

... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] 7 A-5315-15T1 108, 118 (App. Div. 2009 ...

docket:	a5315-15
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-30
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20636

242 V.U. v. L.U. -- rank: 505

... they could lose custody rights, visitation rights, and vacation time. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. In determining custody issues, "the sole benchmark is the best ...

docket:	a5395-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	52082

243 ENGY ABDELKADER v. AHMED ISLAME HOSNY -- rank: 503

... out of state by weighing the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and other relevant considerations, and determining whether the relocation is ... determine what custodial arrangement now serves Alec's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The appeal is dismissed; the matter is remanded to the ...

docket:	a1666-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16951

244 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5740-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 501

... schedule. The judge carefully considered the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Focusing on the age of the child, the judge ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34293

245 GARY S. BENEDUCCI v. MICHELE BENEDUCCI -- rank: 501

... findings of fact as to all statutory custody factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), and the court erred in concluding plaintiff demonstrated changed ...

docket:	a3969-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20275

246 KEITH REPACK v. SHANNON KEAVY June 9 2015 -- rank: 501

... decision, the court must consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Hand , supra , 391 N.J. Super. at 105. Under ...

docket:	a5537-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31036

247 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.S and K.S -- rank: 501

... a best interests analysis, applying the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in order to determine whether the children should remain in ... dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, unless the Title Thirty action involves an out-of-home ...

docket:	a3702-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60735

248 JARRED CIPRIANI v. ASHLEY FONTANA -- rank: 501

... schedule. The judge carefully considered the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Focusing on the age of the child, the judge ...

docket:	a3872-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34707

249 JENNINE DATTOLI v. SCOTT A. DATTOLI -- rank: 498

... statutory factors." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) enumerates thirteen factors for consider ation of the best ... court awards a parent sole legal and physical custody. Similarly, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 states: "[t] he Legislature finds and declares that it is ...

docket:	a2803-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25307

250 F.P. v. H.L -- rank: 498

... domestic violence as one of several factors requiring consideration.' (citing N.J.S.A. 9:2-4)). A-0382-19T1 3 2018].'6 The settlement agreement reiterated ...

docket:	a0382-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-11-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	22191

251 Y.V. v. L.A.M. -- rank: 498

... THE TRIAL COURT FOR A PLENARY HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 AND RULE 5:8-5. JOINT RESIDENTIAL CUSTODY IN PLACE ... that the court did not consider the factors listed in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) as a prerequisite to "making an award of custody"; did not state its factual findings as required by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f); and failed to properly consider the presumption "that the ...

docket:	a3332-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21381

252 Y.V. v. L.A.M. -- rank: 498

... THE TRIAL COURT FOR A PLENARY HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 AND RULE 5:8-5. JOINT RESIDENTIAL CUSTODY IN PLACE ... that the court did not consider the factors listed in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) as a prerequisite to "making an award of custody"; did not state its factual findings as required by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f); and failed to properly consider the presumption "that the ...

docket:	a2157-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21866

253 M.L.,1 v. C.H -- rank: 496

... APPLY SAID FINDINGS TO THE CUSTODY FACTORS SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CONSIDERING ALLEGED MEDICAL ... v. Pascale, 140 N.J. 583, 596 (1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The Court stated ''joint physical custody' means that the child ... responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The statute further provides 'the rights of both parents shall ... of the case to the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). J.G. v. J.H., 457 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a3625-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20566

254 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.M. -- rank: 496

... incorrectly based her decision on the best interest factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Also, because granting custody to S.M. involved moving ...

docket:	a0833-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32249

255 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.M. -- rank: 496

... incorrectly based her decision on the best interest factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Also, because granting custody to S.M. involved moving ...

docket:	a0669-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31558