Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

256 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0605-20.opn.html -- rank: 493

... justify any custody arrangement not agreed to by both parents.' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). Relevant factors include: the parents' ability to agree, communicate ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] In making its determination regarding custody, the court's ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19653

257 T.M v. J.O -- rank: 493

... best interests standard applies and the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 come into play." V.C. v. M.J.B. , 163 ...

docket:	a0733-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21300

258 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.R.O. -- rank: 493

... or submitted certifications. The court assessed the case pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The court found the parents' ability to agree, communicate, and ... been absent from that and not available for meaningful consultation." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Next, the court looked at the parents' willingness to ... W. The court considered the appropriate statutory factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (c) and concluded that awarding custody to K.F. was ...

docket:	a2292-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48600

259 C.T v. N.C.P -- rank: 493

... considers the best interests of the child test articulated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Id. at 254. '[T]he best interest[s] of ...

docket:	a5668-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18915

260 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.M. -- rank: 491

... court in I.S. did analyze the custody factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, I.S. did not hold that analysis of these factors ...

docket:	a5112-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-04-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49775

261 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5020-16.opn.html -- rank: 491

... these lists were the custody factors as set forth under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and the Baures factors set forth in that case. Baures ... trial court failed to apply the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in awarding residential custody of N.J. to defendant ... custody arrangements must serve the best interest of the child. N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4. A number of the statutory best interests factors will A ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23001

262 BRUCE A. MILLER v. KELLY A. GALLAGHER -- rank: 491

... 7-4. In this matter, the trial judge considered the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 factors and, of the fourteen factors applied, he found that ... with the relevant legal conclusions. Although the judge considered the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 factors, he did not compare the facts as they were ...

docket:	a0340-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26479

263 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.A.C. -- rank: 489

... reflected in an order, after the judge ruled, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4.1(a), defendant – in light of his conviction for ...

docket:	a4390-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36194

264 D.Q. VS. F.Q. -- rank: 489

... failed to analyze the child custody statutory factors pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and make the requisite factual findings. A-0950-22 ... analysis of the child custody statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The record reflects plaintiff repeatedly requested sole custody and ...

docket:	a0950-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20640

265 RUSSELL D. COOMBS, JR v. MICHELLE M. COOMBS -- rank: 489

... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)] A prior custody order 'whether reached by consent or ...

docket:	a0479-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49701

266 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4905-16.opn.html -- rank: 489

... court carefully applied each of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.2 The court made credibility findings. For example, 2 N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) states: In making an award of custody, the court ... court fulfilled its obligation to consider the factors identified in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and to set forth its reasons in accord with N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). See Kinsella v. Kinsella, 150 N.J. 276, 316 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11427

267 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/aw-v-td.opn.html -- rank: 486

... dying mother and primary caretaker. New Jersey’s custody statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, expressly directs courts to consider the needs of the children ... transfer of custody, if and when medically necessary. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the parties as joint legal custodians have an ongoing obligation ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24889

268 DAVID MAURIELLO v. DIANE MAURIELLO -- rank: 486

... its decision, the court specifically addressed factors set forth under N.J.S.A . 9:2-4(c) that it found relevant to the resolution of the ... THE COURT FAILED TO CONSIDER MOST OF THE FACTORS IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 REQUIRED BEFORE CUSTODY IS CHANGED. THE STATUTE STATES THAT THE ... citing Fantony v. Fantony , 21 N.J. 525 , 536 (1956)). N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 it deemed relevant to the issues before it. Both parties ...

docket:	A0587-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49344

269 A.K.L. v. M.S.L. -- rank: 484

... consideration of each applicable factor concerning child custody, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and we find no basis to disturb her conclusions. See ...

docket:	a4120-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20879

270 M.J.G. v. M.G. -- rank: 484

... best interests of the child." Ibid. The statutory scheme of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) specifically addresses some, but not all, of the factors ... custody arrangement that is in the minor's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). In deciding the issue, the court is required to ... Judge DeBello also considered each factor under the custody statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). With respect to the factor addressing the preference of ...

docket:	a2582-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23793