Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

286 DANIEL PARKS v. LAURA POULTER -- rank: 462

... In New Jersey, judicial child-custody determinations are controlled by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, intended by the Legislature to balance the constitutional rights of ... the statutory analysis. Kinsella , supra , 150 N.J. at 317. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 provides, in pertinent part: The Legislature finds and declares that ...

docket:	a1947-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	61965

287 E.I. v. L.I. -- rank: 460

... ACTUAL RISK OF HARM TO THE CHILDREN IN DEROGATION OF N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT ... children before suspending her custody and parenting time pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, but rather the court concluded that she may have caused ...

docket:	A0589-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	78896

288 MARK BAKER v. ILENE REILLY -- rank: 460

... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)." Hand v. Hand , 391 N.J. Super. 102 , 105 ... by the other parent," and "the fitness of the parent." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). These factors must be analyzed because "[i]n any ... a minor child, the rights of both parties [are] equal[.]" N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. However, "when the dispute is between a fit parent and ...

docket:	a6115-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17736

289 C.S. v. L.S. -- rank: 460

... best interests of the children under factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). She also contends the court A-3904-16T4 7 ...

docket:	a3904-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18701

290 WANDA KOCH v. STEPHEN R. KOCH -- rank: 458

... the court in considering the thirteen factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). In that regard, the current version of Rule 5 ... should consider and include references to criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, as well as any other information or factors they believe ...

docket:	FM-19-378-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	2012-03-16
status:
citation:	424 N.J. Super. 542 38 A.3d 703
Document Size:	30655

291 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.S. -- rank: 458

... 121 S. Ct. 302, 148 L. Ed. 2d 243 (2000). N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 specifically provides that "[i]n any proceeding involving the custody ...

docket:	a0780-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30411

292 DORA G. HYDUK v. MICHAEL HYDUK -- rank: 458

... determining the child's best interest in this context, see N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and we have no basis to interfere with his conclusion ...

docket:	a5578-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-01
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	82737

293 A.J.M.D.P. v. M.T.R.C. -- rank: 458

... 5.  Thus, after reviewing all the facts and factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the court should consider whether it is in Amanda ...

docket:	a2494-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26204

294 SHARI L. POLLAK v. DAVID KALEN -- rank: 455

... and other expenses.2 He further contends that contrary to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, plaintiff failed to properly consult him about child care expenses ...

docket:	a0911-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10817

295 TRACEY ANNE ZUCCARO v. BRUCE D. ZUCCARO -- rank: 455

... by the other parent; . . . [and] the fitness of the parents . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.] The parties agreed on joint legal custody in 2004. When ...

docket:	a2403-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-02-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17780

296 MISTY ELGERSMA v. COLTON C. CUNNINGHAM -- rank: 455

... For the first time, the court referenced the criteria under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) to consider when ruling on a custody application. After ... the notice of appeal, properly considered the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The judge also found Cunningham to be credible. We ... relocation decision, the court must consider the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and the guidance enunciated under Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 ...

docket:	a2032-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-09-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17447

297 NOEL EUSTAQUIO v. BIYUN ZONG -- rank: 455

... rights for agreed decision-making, was reasonable and appropriate. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 ("[I]t is the public policy of this State to ...

docket:	a2244-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21173

298 D. W v. P. W -- rank: 453

... Meticulously applying each of the fourteen custody factors enumerated at N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge concluded that the overall best interests of the ... v. Sacharow , 177 N.J. 62 , 80 (2003); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. This "best interests of the child" standard is, at its ... N.J. Super. 63 , 71 (App. Div. 1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). The son still ...

docket:	a6227-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	57024

299 S. E. F v. K.D.L -- rank: 453

... interests standard[,] giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- - 4[(c)].' Id. at 227-28, 230. To establish the existence ...

docket:	a2824-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20053

300 D.C. v. V.C -- rank: 453

... is the best interests of the child. See, e.g., N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a) to (c); Pascale v. Pascale, 140 N.J. 583 ...

docket:	a2362-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15973