Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:2-4")   301 to 315 of 400 results. Run time: 0.832 seconds | Search time: 0.825 seconds    
 Page:1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 Previous 15 Next 15
301 S. E. F v. K.D.L -- rank: 453
... interests standard[,] giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- - 4[(c)].' Id. at 227-28, 230. To establish the existence ...
docket: a2824-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-06-02
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20053
302 M.H.S. v. L.G.S. -- rank: 453
... prove the best interests of the child in accordance with N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Our standard of review, therefore, is broader than if ...
docket: a5816-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-09-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35831
303 D. W v. P. W -- rank: 453
... Meticulously applying each of the fourteen custody factors enumerated at N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge concluded that the overall best interests of the ... v. Sacharow , 177 N.J. 62 , 80 (2003); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. This "best interests of the child" standard is, at its ... N.J. Super. 63 , 71 (App. Div. 1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). The son still ...
docket: a6227-07
court: njappellate
decided: 2009-03-10
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 57024
304 NORMAN SCHLEIFFER v. LOIS SCHLEIFFER -- rank: 453
... and capacity to reason as to form an intelligent decision." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (c). In doing so, the court should "'conduct a private ... that the judge failed to consider the appropriate statutory factors. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The judge noted, in part: [B]oth parties [were] in ...
docket: a1935-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34180
305 JENNA SCOTT v. GEOFFREY SCOTT -- rank: 448
... the best interests of the child factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The court also noted that the children have all ... the trial court undertook an analysis of each of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) best interests factors, which controlled here. For these reasons ... child's medical wellbeing, including 'the needs of the child . . . .' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The trial court neither abused its discretion nor erred ...
docket: a0506-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-04-28
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16541
306 MICHAEL PETRONGOLO v. MELINA ALVES -- rank: 441
... in the best interest of the child, the court applies N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c): In making an award of custody, the court shall ... record indicates that Judge Tomasello painstakingly analyzed each factor of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), considering defendant's testimony and the other evidence submitted ...
docket: a1095-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-11-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13892
307 ROBERT GOLDMAN v. GAIL MAUTNER -- rank: 441
... for joint custody and the factors to be considered under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded joint legal and physical custody of both ... to custody and parenting time. He considered each factor under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and applied those factors in light of his factual findings ...
docket: a4085-07
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-12-18
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 89521
308 CRAIG P. STATT v. KAREN KNOX-STATT -- rank: 438
... and maintaining a close relationship with both of his parents. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; McCown v. McCown , 277 N.J. Super. 213 , 218 (App ...
docket: a3102-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-02-22
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12552
309 G.T v. Y.A -- rank: 436
... are qualified, however, by the multiple factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, which require courts to evaluate a child's best interests ...
docket: a1613-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-11-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20831
310 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.L. -- rank: 436
... this subject "convincing." Judge Stein also considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 for a determination of the child's best interests. The ...
docket: a0159-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21789
311 F.A v. C.L.M -- rank: 436
... Points program. A-2968-18T1 8 The judge analyzed the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors, concluded the majority of the factors weighed in ...
docket: a2968-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-05-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27441
312 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2480-17.opn.html -- rank: 434
... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). V.C. v. M.J.B., 163 N.J ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25162
313 M.C. v. J.U. -- rank: 434
... S. Kessler entered an order in February 2008, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, suspending defendant's visitation with his sons, as well ... 378 (1995)). Defendant's request for visitation is governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a). That statute provides: Notwithstanding any provision of law ... nor does it affect the person's child support obligation. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(c). This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...
docket: a3952-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17291
314 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.E. -- rank: 434
... best interest, giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The judge concluded that appellants did not meet the standard ...
docket: a4535-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17993
315 KARIN VALENTINE v. JOHN J. VALENTINE -- rank: 434
... and maintaining a close relationship with both of his parents. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; McCown v. McCown , 277 N.J. Super. 213 , 218 (App ...
docket: a2197-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-12-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35561
 Page:1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!