Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.S. -- rank: 648

... the Placement of Children ("ICPC"), codified in New Jersey at N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. They argue that the ICPC does not apply to the ...

docket:	a5294-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-23
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	93536

17 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. D.F.L and A.T.F -- rank: 630

... Florida home 3 Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. A-4840-18T3 6 study. Based upon the Division's ...

docket:	a4840-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26724

18 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.H. -- rank: 612

... under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC). N.J.S.A. 9:23-5.3 Additionally, the Division contacted F.F., 2 Hospital records ...

docket:	a2045-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26989

19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION and PERMANENCY v. R.L Sr. -- rank: 602

... because such a placement would be contrary to law. See N.J.S.A. 9:23-5, art. III, subd. (d). VI The father and the Law ...

docket:	a5300-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45467

20 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4988-15a4989-15.opn.html -- rank: 577

... 2008), the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC), N.J.S.A. 9:23-5, requires: 8 A-4988-15T4 if children are removed from ... brother or sister, adult uncle or aunt, or his guardian . . . ,' N.J.S.A. 9:23-5-VIII(a), the placement here would have been made by ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18655

21 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PE -- rank: 573

... pursuant to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children. N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. He travelled to New Jersey by bus only once, in ...

docket:	a3098-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12754

22 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3546-15a3547-15a3548-15a3549-15.opn.html -- rank: 566

... that the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC), N.J.S.A. 9:23-5, does not apply to out-of-state placements of children ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	64538

23 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. L.C., -- rank: 476

... or the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC), N.J.S.A. 9:23-5 to -17; and 3) the trial judge's findings were ...

docket:	a4574-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-01-15
status:	published
citation:	346 N.J. Super. 435
Document Size:	10438

24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.M and S.S -- rank: 419

... through the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC), N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. Defendant was incarcerated multiple times and had domestic violence and ...

docket:	a4728-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	8567

25 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.W. and M.C. -- rank: 365

... the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (ICPC). 1 N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. Six weeks after D.C.-W.'s birth, the Division ...

docket:	a3083-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18904

26 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. E.W. and M.C. -- rank: 365

... the Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children (ICPC). 1 N.J.S.A. 9:23-5. Six weeks after D.C.-W.'s birth, the Division ...

docket:	a3084-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18904