Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 Fred Burnett v. County of Bergen, et al. -- rank: 965

... their context” and “given their generally accepted meaning.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. To that end, “statutes must be read ...

docket:	a-43-08
court:
decided:	2009-04-27
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 408
Document Size:	139698

17 DONALD SALAAM v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF IRVINGTON, ESSEX COUNTY -- rank: 965

... p u r s u a n t t o N . J . S . A . 1 8 A : 1 6 - 6 . 1. T h e B ... s ts p u r s u a nt to N . J . S . A . 1 8 A : 1 6- 6 . 1; a n d, if ... t h e s t a t u t e . N . J . S . A . 1 8 A :1 6 -6. 1 , p r o v ... on w a s b a s e d on N . J . S . A . 1 8 A : 1 6- 6 . 1 , w h i c ... e f e r s b a c k to N . J . S . A. 1 8 A : 1 6-6. Id. at 4 23 ( c ... d a t o r y ," u n d er N . J . S . A. 1 8 A : 16-6, " if t h e c ...

docket:	a5592-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	871180

18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GARY TWIGGS -- rank: 963

... with its ordinary meaning unless otherwise specified. Ibid. ; see also N.J.S.A. 1:1-1 (explaining that "words and phrases [in statutes] shall ... or parties as well as to 1 person or party[.]" N.J.S.A. 1:1-2. To assume there can only be one "actor ...

docket:	a4417-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-22
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 23 135 A.3d 981
Document Size:	80675

19 John J. Robertelli v. The New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics -- rank: 963

... Sch. Dist., Somerset Cty. , 221 N.J. 349 , 361 (2015); N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. We also read the language of a rule ...

docket:	A-62-14
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-04-19
status:
citation:	224 N.J. 470 134 A.3d 963
Document Size:	77771

20 Josh Finkelman v. National Football League -- rank: 961

... meaning, according to the approved usage of the language.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. We construe the statutory language “in context ...

docket:	a-38-17
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2019-01-09
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44568

21 Anna Mae Cashin v. Marisela Bello -- rank: 958

... context” and give them “their generally accepted meaning.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. A court “may neither rewrite a plainly ...

docket:	A-98-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-10-07
status:
citation:	223 N.J. 328 123 A.3d 1042
Document Size:	80516

22 NorthJersey Media Group, Inc. v. Township of Lyndhurst -- rank: 958

... their context and apply their “generally accepted meaning.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1; see also DiProspero , supra , 183 N.J. at ...

docket:	A-35-15
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2017-07-11
status:
citation:	229 N.J. 541 163 A.3d 887
Document Size:	117487

23 C.R. v. M. T. \t -- rank: 958

... according to the approved usage of the language.” See N.J.S.A. 1:1- 1. Like the Appellate Division, we turn to dictionary ... accepted meaning.” Ante at ___ (slip op. at 22) (quoting N.J.S.A. 1:1-1). To “consider” means to “think carefully ...

docket:	a_47_22
court:	supreme
decided:	2024-04-19
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	136563

24 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a-17-21.opn.html -- rank: 956

... laws governs this appeal. He asserts that the Savings Statute, N.J.S.A. 1:1-15, is irrelevant to the retroactivity issue presented in ... is unrebutted in this appeal, and that the Savings Statute, N.J.S.A. 1:1-15, precludes retroactive application of N.J.S.A ...

docket:
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	50941

25 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a-17-21.opn.html -- rank: 956

... laws governs this appeal. He asserts that the Savings Statute, N.J.S.A. 1:1-15, is irrelevant to the retroactivity issue presented in ... is unrebutted in this appeal, and that the Savings Statute, N.J.S.A. 1:1-15, precludes retroactive application of N.J.S.A ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	51048

26 State v. Oscar Lopez-Carrera -- rank: 956

... courts must give words “their generally accepted meaning.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. 22 A statute’s words and phrases should ... refers to the voluntary act of showing up. Consistent with N.J.S.A. 1:1-1, words and phrases in a statute must not ...

docket:	a-8-9-20
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2021-03-30
status:
citation:
Document Size:	111694

27 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a9813annavmarisela.opn.html -- rank: 954

... context” and give them “their generally accepted meaning.” N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. A court “may neither rewrite a plainly ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	47938

28 David Goyco v. Progressive Insurance Company \t \r\n\t\t \r\n \r\n\r\n\t\r\n -- rank: 952

... unless a “different meaning is expressly indicated,” see N.J.S.A. 1:1-1, which corresponds with traditional principles of statutory construction ... in accordance with such technical or special and accepted meaning. [N.J.S.A. 1:1-1 (emphasis added).] 14 Those instructions correspond with traditional ... “highway” as we did for “vehicle,” see N.J.S.A. 1:1-1; DiProspero, 183 N.J. at 492, we find ...

docket:	a_12_23
court:	supreme
decided:	2024-05-13
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	51525

29 RATAN AC LLC, v. CITY OF ABSECON, -- rank: 950

... provide whenever registered mail is required, certified mail would suffice. N.J.S.A. 1:1-2; L. 1955 c. 226, § 1; 1 955 ... Union Bank, 199 N.J. 251 , 258 (2009). See also N.J.S.A. 1:1-1. It is presumed at the time of adoption ... a confirmation of mailing. L. 2015, c. 251, § 1; N.J.S.A. 1:1-2. The requirements of the confirmation of mailing mirror ... 1.1 (delivery address). L. 2015, c. 251, § 1; N.J.S.A. 1:1-2. -13- This court is not suggesting a recipient ...

docket:	00923-23
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32044

30 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. A.M. -- rank: 948

... of the word 'may' in both subsections in context. See N.J.S.A. 1:1-1 (requiring in part that the '[w]ords and ...

docket:	a3010-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-02
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	74418