Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

151 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INS. CO. VS RUTH BREEN -- rank: 568

... s customers to $15,000, and the "parity" provision of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e (emphasis added).] The insurer contended that because underinsured motorist ... ground that, once an insured had purchased underinsured motorist insurance, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b and -1.1e prohibited the insurer from reducing the ... expressly overruled. The purpose of Aubrey's new interpretation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e is presumably to further the legislative intent of rewarding ...

docket:	a4681-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-02-19
status:	published
citation:	297 N.J.Super. 503
Document Size:	39820

152 VITO CANNAVO, III v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 568

... overruled by P.L. 2007, c.163, an amendment to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, effective September 10, 2007. That amendment adds paragraph f ...

docket:	a6458-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-10-16
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	57420

153 GEICO v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 565

... its pro-rata share of any arbitration award pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Specifically, Geico claimed the City should pay a pro ... PROVIDE UM BENEFITS CONTINUES IN LIGHT OF THE AMENDMENTS TO N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, WHICH ELIMINATED MANDATORY UNINSURED MOTORISTS COVERAGE. In Christy , our ... basic policy" option as well. Because of the amendments to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and the creation of the new "basic policy[,]"[] the ...

docket:	a1442-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30598

154 STEVEN T. WALL, JR v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 563

... App. Div. 2008), this court held that an amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, enacted September 10, 2007, does not apply retroactively to ... abrogated the holding of Pinto by enacting the amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 prohibiting step-down clauses in a business or corporate ... coverage for plaintiff under the employer's policy. Arguing that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. It held that the amendment would apply only prospectively ...

docket:	a4454-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	23693

155 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 560

... by law. Id. at 400-01. The Court noted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) states that [a] motor vehicle is underinsured when ... 15,000. Id. at 404. The Court observed that, under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), the right to recover UIM benefits depends on ...

docket:	a3571-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29730

156 ROBERT FLAHERTY v. DALTON INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC. -- rank: 560

... legislation enacted after Pinto to prohibit such step-down provisions, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, was to be applied prospectively only, as we had ... addressed the scope and applicability of a statutory immunity provision, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9a, enacted for the purpose of protecting insurance companies, agents ...

docket:	a3157-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20939

157 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4045-19.opn.html -- rank: 558

... mandatory minimum specified by the laws of New Jersey.' See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(1) (setting the mandatory minimum amount of bodily ... A. 39:6A-1 to -35, and the UIM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to -1.9. The discovery period was protracted by ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22041

158 STEPHANIE JOSEPHS v. CHRISTINA M. HEPP -- rank: 555

... by a carrier authorized to do business in New Jersey. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 imposes the limitation-on-lawsuit threshold to such persons ...

docket:	a1474-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31346

159 OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF SHANNON KAY WITTKOPP, STANLEY EISEMAN, and SANDRA EISEMAN, -- rank: 555

... division of settlements is mandated only in uninsured motorist cases. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c); See footnote 4 Magnifico , 153 N.J. at ...

docket:	a4301-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-12-16
status:	published
citation:	326 N.J.Super. 407
Document Size:	24187

160 EDGAR GREEN, JR v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 550

... App. Div. 2005), certif. denied , 186 N.J. 244 (2006). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) provides that a motor vehicle is underinsured when ...

docket:	a4036-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30264

161 LOUISE MORRISON v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 550

... benefits was $15,000 per person, $30,000 per accident. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Since plaintiff was neither a named insured nor resident ... liability for 'bodily injury' is the minimum limit required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1." A family member under the policy was defined as ...

docket:	a3484-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-09
status:	published
citation:	381 N.J. Super. 532
Document Size:	62198

162 CATHRYNE M. LOFTUS-SMITH V. GREGORY A. SMITH, ET AL -- rank: 545

... the verbal threshold to bar plaintiff's claim against Henry, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the "deemer" statute, must be satisfied. The trial court ... she is deemed to have elected the verbal threshold option. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, which requires insurance companies authorized to transact business in ...

docket:	a1720-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-23
status:	published published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	39433

163 MICHAEL ORODENKER and WILLIAM COCKER, JR v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 545

... provide "similar coverage" to that provided by Selective, and (3) N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, which renders unenforceable step-down provisions in employers' policies ... all of the policies is "similar." Finally, appellants argue that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f should be applied retroactively. The Selective policy was issued ... decision, the Legislature enacted the statute that became codified as N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, effective September 10, 2007, reversing the holding in Pinto ... court issued an opinion on July 22, 2008, holding that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f was not curative because its purpose was not to ...

docket:	a4240-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21450

164 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE TOWN OF KEARNY -- rank: 542

... UIM coverage for the vehicle Swartz was driving. Relying on N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), and Downey , supra , 273 N.J. Super. at ... UIM coverage unless the policyholder chooses to purchase that coverage. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. As we recognized in Downey , supra , 273 N.J ... contract, obligating itself to furnish the UM coverage mandated under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to the extent of at least the statutory minimum ...

docket:	a1954-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32264

165 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY V. VASSAS -- rank: 537

... accident have been exhausted by payment of settlements or judgments." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1).     We essentially adopt the procedure set forth ...

docket:	a-43-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-01-18
status:
citation:	139 N.J. 163
Document Size:	37271