Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:28-1")   151 to 165 of 291 results. Run time: 0.899 seconds | Search time: 0.892 seconds    
 Page:1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 Previous 15 Next 15
151 ROSE CALABRESE & FRANCES B. PACE VS SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ET AL -- rank: 568
... at the time of the accident within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e and the two Selective policies of insurance. We conclude ... of the "policy held by the person seeking that recovery." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e(1).     In Tyler v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins ... question of credits to be made available to Selective under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e. "Under the explicit and unambiguous language of this statute ... Div. 1996), or the stacking of coverage in contravention of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c. V     Lastly, we consider Selective's assertion that despite ...
docket: a4279-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-02-10
status: published
citation: 297 N.J.Super. 423
Document Size: 28607
152 GEICO v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 565
... its pro-rata share of any arbitration award pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Specifically, Geico claimed the City should pay a pro ... PROVIDE UM BENEFITS CONTINUES IN LIGHT OF THE AMENDMENTS TO N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, WHICH ELIMINATED MANDATORY UNINSURED MOTORISTS COVERAGE. In Christy , our ... basic policy" option as well. Because of the amendments to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and the creation of the new "basic policy[,]"[] the ...
docket: a1442-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-12-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30598
153 STEVEN T. WALL, JR v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 563
... App. Div. 2008), this court held that an amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, enacted September 10, 2007, does not apply retroactively to ... abrogated the holding of Pinto by enacting the amendment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 prohibiting step-down clauses in a business or corporate ... coverage for plaintiff under the employer's policy. Arguing that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. It held that the amendment would apply only prospectively ...
docket: a4454-07
court: njappellate
decided: 2009-03-02
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 23693
154 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 560
... by law. Id. at 400-01. The Court noted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) states that [a] motor vehicle is underinsured when ... 15,000. Id. at 404. The Court observed that, under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), the right to recover UIM benefits depends on ...
docket: a3571-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-11-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29730
155 ROBERT FLAHERTY v. DALTON INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC. -- rank: 560
... legislation enacted after Pinto to prohibit such step-down provisions, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, was to be applied prospectively only, as we had ... addressed the scope and applicability of a statutory immunity provision, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9a, enacted for the purpose of protecting insurance companies, agents ...
docket: a3157-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20939
156 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4045-19.opn.html -- rank: 558
... mandatory minimum specified by the laws of New Jersey.' See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(1) (setting the mandatory minimum amount of bodily ... A. 39:6A-1 to -35, and the UIM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to -1.9. The discovery period was protracted by ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 22041
157 STEPHANIE JOSEPHS v. CHRISTINA M. HEPP -- rank: 555
... by a carrier authorized to do business in New Jersey. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 imposes the limitation-on-lawsuit threshold to such persons ...
docket: a1474-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31346
158 OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF SHANNON KAY WITTKOPP, STANLEY EISEMAN, and SANDRA EISEMAN, -- rank: 555
... division of settlements is mandated only in uninsured motorist cases. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c); See footnote 4 Magnifico , 153 N.J. at ...
docket: a4301-97
court: njappellate
decided: 1999-12-16
status: published
citation: 326 N.J.Super. 407
Document Size: 24187
159 LOUISE MORRISON v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 550
... benefits was $15,000 per person, $30,000 per accident. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Since plaintiff was neither a named insured nor resident ... liability for 'bodily injury' is the minimum limit required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1." A family member under the policy was defined as ...
docket: a3484-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-12-09
status: published
citation: 381 N.J. Super. 532
Document Size: 62198
160 EDGAR GREEN, JR v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 550
... App. Div. 2005), certif. denied , 186 N.J. 244 (2006). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e) provides that a motor vehicle is underinsured when ...
docket: a4036-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-02-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30264
161 MICHAEL ORODENKER and WILLIAM COCKER, JR v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA -- rank: 545
... provide "similar coverage" to that provided by Selective, and (3) N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, which renders unenforceable step-down provisions in employers' policies ... all of the policies is "similar." Finally, appellants argue that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f should be applied retroactively. The Selective policy was issued ... decision, the Legislature enacted the statute that became codified as N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, effective September 10, 2007, reversing the holding in Pinto ... court issued an opinion on July 22, 2008, holding that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f was not curative because its purpose was not to ...
docket: a4240-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-03-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21450
162 CATHRYNE M. LOFTUS-SMITH V. GREGORY A. SMITH, ET AL -- rank: 545
... the verbal threshold to bar plaintiff's claim against Henry, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the "deemer" statute, must be satisfied. The trial court ... she is deemed to have elected the verbal threshold option. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, which requires insurance companies authorized to transact business in ...
docket: a1720-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-01-23
status: published published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 39433
163 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE TOWN OF KEARNY -- rank: 542
... UIM coverage for the vehicle Swartz was driving. Relying on N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(b), and Downey , supra , 273 N.J. Super. at ... UIM coverage unless the policyholder chooses to purchase that coverage. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. As we recognized in Downey , supra , 273 N.J ... contract, obligating itself to furnish the UM coverage mandated under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to the extent of at least the statutory minimum ...
docket: a1954-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-03-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32264
164 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY V. VASSAS -- rank: 537
... accident have been exhausted by payment of settlements or judgments." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1).     We essentially adopt the procedure set forth ...
docket: a-43-94
court: njsupreme
decided: 1995-01-18
status:
citation: 139 N.J. 163
Document Size: 37271
165 ROSARIO AGUIRRE v. IFA INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 535
... and UIM coverage is governed in New Jersey by statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. A standard automobile liability policy issued in New Jersey ... 2002) (citations omitted).] We consider the history and purposes of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 to be instructive. We set forth that history in ...
docket: a5468-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-09-30
status: unpublished
citation: 198 N.J. 473
Document Size: 43053
 Page:1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!