Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 GARRY KENNY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 517

... aff'd as modified , 79 N.J. 400 (1979). Thus N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 must, in our view, be read as incorporating all ... mandated by statute ...," that is to say, those mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, which incorporate N.J.S.A. 39:6-78 ... by the policy as contrary to the coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and 39:6-78). And see Liberty Mut. Ins ...

docket:	a1708-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-02-23
status:	published
citation:	328 N.J.Super. 403
Document Size:	19936

182 NATALIE GAMBINO, Executrix of the Estate of Carol Gambino, and JERRY VARRONE, Guardian Ad Litem of Thomas Gambino, Jr., et al. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 515

... the $500,000 per accident policy limit. We conclude that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e, which defines underinsured automobile insurance coverage, and case law ... protection.                         III             Our decision is guided by an interpretation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e where the UIM coverage is split limits, in Calabrese ... expectations of the parties will be satisfied. The requirement in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e that the limits of UIM coverage available to an ...

docket:	A2306-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-02-27
status:	published
citation:	348 N.J. Super. 204 791 A.2d 104
Document Size:	23457

183 R. MERVIN GUSTAVE, et al. v. LUIS FLORES, et al. -- rank: 510

... the verbal threshold as it applies to bus passengers, see N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.5 to -1.7, which was enacted as part of ... of its passengers who sustained injuries on the bus. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6a. They do not argue that, if they had no ...

docket:	a5443-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33585

184 ASHLEY AGGOUR v. GEICO -- rank: 510

... accident have been exhausted by payment of settlements or judgments . [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) (emphasis added).] When multiple claimants are injured ... UIM policy did not cover such a shortfall, citing to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e). See also David v. Government Employees Ins. Co ...

docket:	a1881-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14633

185 TUSHAR V. PATEL v. APRIL SIMS, et al. -- rank: 507

... support of the motion, defendant argued that plaintiff, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, otherwise known as the "deemer" statute, failed to pierce ...

docket:	a6525-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40372

186 VANESSA RIVERA v. ELMER F. McCRAY, III -- rank: 505

... 183 N.J. 405 , 412 (2005), superseded in part by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) (prohibiting step-down provisions in certain business auto ...

docket:	a2337-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-02
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 315 137 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	30280

187 KARIN DERFUSS V. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 505

... liability since the question was not raised. Footnote: 2 Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a(1), the minimum coverage under any automobile liability policy ...

docket:	a6009-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1995-11-08
status:	published
citation:	285 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	26238

188 RAY GRANT v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... reducing the limits of UIM coverage is in contravention of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b and asks that the policy be reformed by deleting ... the covered vehicle at the time of the accident, contravenes N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. That statute requires insurers to offer policyholders an opportunity ... contravention between the language of the step-down provision and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. Accordingly, we affirm. On or about November 1, 2003 ...

docket:	A0617-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-05-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46938

189 DON WASHINGTON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... issue automobile insurance policies in New Jersey, plaintiff asserted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (the Deemer Statute) applied and required reformation of his ... an out-of-state automobile policy is [not] deemed by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 to provide PIP benefits when the named insured is ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (emphasis added).] 'The legislation was in response to a ... policy is used or operated in this State.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4). We then noted by analogy that 'courts have examined ...

docket:	a2422-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14098

190 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4279-19.opn.html -- rank: 502

... arising from a claim for underinsured motorist's benefits (UIM), N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, defendant High Point Safety & Insurance Co. (High Point) appeals ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19375

191 GISELE LIGHTNER v. TOMAS SOLIS, -- rank: 502

... J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and 6B-1, and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. It had previously been insured by Colonial Penn Insurance ...

docket:	A3156-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-04-15
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	26916

192 NATALEE GORDON AND JOSEPH GORDON v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... within the meaning of the UM statute" set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e(2). B. As to plaintiffs' second argument, that the ... phrase "arising out of the . . . use of a motor vehicle." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a. In Grabowski , supra , 345 N.J. Super. at 243 ...

docket:	a4446-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	22540

193 Zirger v. General Accident Insurance Company -- rank: 502

... 1983, c. 65, § 5, and L. 1983, c. 362, § 1, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 imposed on automobile insurers the obligation to provide uninsured ...

docket:	a-68-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-06-12
status:
citation:	144 N.J. 327
Document Size:	54637

194 TERRANCE SIMPSON v. HAROLD SCTOOT -- rank: 499

... coverage, authorized in New Jersey by the uninsured motorist statute N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. This statute serves two purposes. It is designed to ...

docket:	a1357-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30748

195 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC -- rank: 499

... injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4], or although required did not maintain personal injury protection ...

docket:	a5904-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 546 22 A.3d 91
Document Size:	18085