Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

181 NATALIE GAMBINO, Executrix of the Estate of Carol Gambino, and JERRY VARRONE, Guardian Ad Litem of Thomas Gambino, Jr., et al. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 515

... the $500,000 per accident policy limit. We conclude that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e, which defines underinsured automobile insurance coverage, and case law ... protection.                         III             Our decision is guided by an interpretation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e where the UIM coverage is split limits, in Calabrese ... expectations of the parties will be satisfied. The requirement in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e that the limits of UIM coverage available to an ...

docket:	A2306-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-02-27
status:	published
citation:	348 N.J. Super. 204 791 A.2d 104
Document Size:	23457

182 R. MERVIN GUSTAVE, et al. v. LUIS FLORES, et al. -- rank: 510

... the verbal threshold as it applies to bus passengers, see N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.5 to -1.7, which was enacted as part of ... of its passengers who sustained injuries on the bus. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6a. They do not argue that, if they had no ...

docket:	a5443-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33585

183 ASHLEY AGGOUR v. GEICO -- rank: 510

... accident have been exhausted by payment of settlements or judgments . [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) (emphasis added).] When multiple claimants are injured ... UIM policy did not cover such a shortfall, citing to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e). See also David v. Government Employees Ins. Co ...

docket:	a1881-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14633

184 TUSHAR V. PATEL v. APRIL SIMS, et al. -- rank: 507

... support of the motion, defendant argued that plaintiff, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, otherwise known as the "deemer" statute, failed to pierce ...

docket:	a6525-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40372

185 VANESSA RIVERA v. ELMER F. McCRAY, III -- rank: 505

... 183 N.J. 405 , 412 (2005), superseded in part by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f) (prohibiting step-down provisions in certain business auto ...

docket:	a2337-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-02
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 315 137 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	30280

186 KARIN DERFUSS V. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 505

... liability since the question was not raised. Footnote: 2 Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a(1), the minimum coverage under any automobile liability policy ...

docket:	a6009-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1995-11-08
status:	published
citation:	285 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	26238

187 RAY GRANT v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... reducing the limits of UIM coverage is in contravention of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b and asks that the policy be reformed by deleting ... the covered vehicle at the time of the accident, contravenes N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. That statute requires insurers to offer policyholders an opportunity ... contravention between the language of the step-down provision and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b. Accordingly, we affirm. On or about November 1, 2003 ...

docket:	A0617-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-05-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46938

188 Zirger v. General Accident Insurance Company -- rank: 502

... 1983, c. 65, § 5, and L. 1983, c. 362, § 1, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 imposed on automobile insurers the obligation to provide uninsured ...

docket:	a-68-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-06-12
status:
citation:	144 N.J. 327
Document Size:	54637

189 DON WASHINGTON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... issue automobile insurance policies in New Jersey, plaintiff asserted that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (the Deemer Statute) applied and required reformation of his ... an out-of-state automobile policy is [not] deemed by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 to provide PIP benefits when the named insured is ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (emphasis added).] 'The legislation was in response to a ... policy is used or operated in this State.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4). We then noted by analogy that 'courts have examined ...

docket:	a2422-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14098

190 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4279-19.opn.html -- rank: 502

... arising from a claim for underinsured motorist's benefits (UIM), N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, defendant High Point Safety & Insurance Co. (High Point) appeals ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19375

191 NATALEE GORDON AND JOSEPH GORDON v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 502

... within the meaning of the UM statute" set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e(2). B. As to plaintiffs' second argument, that the ... phrase "arising out of the . . . use of a motor vehicle." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a. In Grabowski , supra , 345 N.J. Super. at 243 ...

docket:	a4446-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	22540

192 GISELE LIGHTNER v. TOMAS SOLIS, -- rank: 502

... J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and 6B-1, and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. It had previously been insured by Colonial Penn Insurance ...

docket:	A3156-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-04-15
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	26916

193 BEVERLY SOUTHARD v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 499

... to identify the hit-and-run motorist is also statutory. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, the statute mandating UM coverage in this State, incorporates ...

docket:	a3286-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36764

194 TERRANCE SIMPSON v. HAROLD SCTOOT -- rank: 499

... coverage, authorized in New Jersey by the uninsured motorist statute N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. This statute serves two purposes. It is designed to ...

docket:	a1357-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30748

195 COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK v. MARY STEIGER, et al. -- rank: 499

... products liability defendant. The law governing coverage is codified in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Here, the Commercial policy is a "standard automobile insurance ...

docket:	A1314-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-20
status:	published
citation:	395 N.J. Super. 109 928 A.2d 126
Document Size:	50968