Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

196 ABDUL H. MUHAMMAD v. ELIZABETH YELLOW CAB INC -- rank: 499

... We will pay Pedestrian Personal Injury Protection benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, which states: Every liability insurance policy issued in this ...

docket:	a4197-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33244

197 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC -- rank: 499

... injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4], or although required did not maintain personal injury protection ...

docket:	a5904-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-29
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 546 22 A.3d 91
Document Size:	18085

198 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0980-17.opn.html -- rank: 497

... coverage approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance . 2 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. A-0980-17T3 6 To the extent we have ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	11324

199 GUARO SOLANO, TANGELA MOORE et al. v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION -- rank: 494

... additional optional coverage. In adopting AICRA, the Legislature also amended N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, expressly exempting "basic policies" from the requirement of providing UM and underinsured ("UIM") coverage. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a. As a final manifestation of its intent, the Legislature ...

docket:	A1471-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32357

200 ANNAMARIE ALMOND deceased by and through the Administrator of her Estate Mandala Brown v. ANGEL L. MARTINEZ ESTATE OF ANGEL L MARTINEZ, and R&J CAB SERVICE, INC and ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY / v. R&J CAB SERVICE INC. and OCEA -- rank: 492

... a taxi. Consequently, Allstate sought reimbursement from ORRG. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, ORRG's policy of liability insurance on a motor ... OR ORDERS AND, THEREFORE, IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. II. THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATOR SHOULD BE VACATED ...

docket:	a2923-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	23978

201 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2923-11.opn.html -- rank: 492

... a taxi. Consequently, Allstate sought reimbursement from ORRG. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, ORRG's policy of liability insurance on a motor ... OR ORDERS AND, THEREFORE, IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. II. THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATOR SHOULD BE VACATED ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23563

202 NOWELL JAMES v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 489

... policy's "step-down" provision. Plaintiff countered by arguing that, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f), effective September 10, 2007, which essentially prohibited the ... claim predicated upon an accident which predates the adoption of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(f)." Id. at 506. Our colleagues in Hand , however ... 1993) (where we characterized the effect of the "deemer" statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, to be the "automatic reformation of out-of-state ...

docket:	a2108-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16068

203 JHONG SIK KIM v. DAVID L. FINGEROTH -- rank: 489

... for a new trial. We do not retain jurisdiction. 1   N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a(2) mandates the inclusion of UM coverage in all ...

docket:	a4062-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27893

204 MARIE ST. SURIN v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 489

... came from or was part of a motor vehicle. II N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1) defines "underinsured motorist coverage" as "insurance for ... operation or use of an underinsured motor vehicle ." (Emphasis added). N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(2) defines, in relevant part, the term "uninsured ...

docket:	a1902-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22932

205 Margaret Samuel v. John Doe -- rank: 489

... the negligent operation of an uninsured motor vehicle. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b, insurance companies must offer such coverage. Footnote: 2The liability ...

docket:	a-216-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-04-21
status:
citation:	158 N.J. 134
Document Size:	35237

206 AETNA CAS. & SURETY CO. VS PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. INS. CO. OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 487

... Legislature was aware that "multiple policies" might provide UIM coverage, [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(c)], it specifically provided that to determine whether a ... that may apply to the benefit of the claimant. See , N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e).         [264 N.J. Super. at 259.]     Following Aubrey ...

docket:	a3307-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-12-20
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 116
Document Size:	18282

207 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. DANIEL DITULLIO -- rank: 484

... is otherwise referred to as the collateral source rule. 3 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 (requiring commercial vehicles to provide PIP coverage for pedestrians ...

docket:	a0887-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27750

208 HETAL SHAH v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 482

... found in the same statute that governs UM coverage. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. "Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b, UIM coverage is discretionary, not mandatory." Aubrey v. Harleysville ...

docket:	a2216-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40086

209 RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANDREW MCADAMS -- rank: 482

... vehicle insurance policy held by the person seeking that recovery. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e.] Under both definitions, the McQuate vehicle was not "underinsured ... written out of state that do not provide such coverage. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Hence, Pennsylvania statutory law does not require insurers writing ... the same vehicle or available to the same accident victim. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c. However, stacking need not be considered unless there is ...

docket:	A0101-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-05-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43851

210 RAYMOND ARNE VS RONALD & CAROL BROCK LIOTTA & ET ALS -- rank: 482

Original WP 5.1 Version (NOTE: This decision was approved by the court for publication.) This case can also be found at *CITE_PENDING*. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION                             SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY                             APPELLATE DIVISION                             A-6891-96T2 RAYMOND ARNE, PIERRE and LINDA ARNE, h ...

docket:	a6891-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-07-10
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	19035