Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

226 CHANTE BALDWIN v. HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 469

... 25,000, as required by the anti-stacking provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c, and prorated liability for that amount to the carriers ... by the anti-stacking provisions of the applicable UM statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c, which states: Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage provided for ... between the provisions of the trial de novo rule and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c, capping recovery of UM benefits at a level less ...

docket:	A1768-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45346

227 ALISON MOSES v. ROBERT J. MANALO -- rank: 469

... the lawsuit limitation threshold through application of the Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8(a ... under the policy is used or operated in this State." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Since plaintiff's insurance provider provided insurance coverage in ...

docket:	a4569-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12172

228 JENNIFER GRABOWSKI et al. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 469

... definition of an uninsured motor vehicle as set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1a, the Liberty policy issued to plaintiff provided that UM ...

docket:	a6756-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-11-28
status:	published
citation:	345 N.J. Super. 241
Document Size:	16848

229 SUSAN OLKUSZ v. LAKINGY BROWN -- rank: 467

... appeal, we are required to determine whether an amendment to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, adopted by the Legislature on September 10, 2007, reversing ... On September 10, 2007, the Legislature adopted S-1666, amending N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 as follows: (f) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section ...

docket:	a2216-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-22
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 496 951 A.2d 106
Document Size:	54602

230 MARGIE FELICIANO v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 467

... Encompass Insurance Company, containing Uninsured Motorist Coverage (UM) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. On October 16, 2000, at approximately 8:30 p ...

docket:	a4562-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-04-24
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40144

231 HARRY GRANT V. CLAUDE N. THOMAS, ET AL. -- rank: 467

... final summary judgment declaring that the New Jersey "deemer" statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, imposes Personal Injury Protection liability limits up to $250 ... under the policy is used or operated in this State.         [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4].     There are two issues in this case. The first ...

docket:	a0713-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-12-31
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	18146

232 SHARON A. WEST v. AMERIPRISE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 464

... use of such uninsured or hit and run motor vehicle[.]" N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(2). "[A]n insured who seeks UM benefits ... Div. 1973), aff'd 65 N.J. 152 (1974); see N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a)(2). What constitutes a "substantial nexus" varies depending ...

docket:	a0150-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-02-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25905

233 DEBORAH BILOTTI v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 462

... She found that defendant was not entitled to immunity under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9a because it could not produce a signed CSF. Although ... the distinction between denying defendant the statutory immunity provided by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9a, and relieving plaintiff of the burden that she must ... was appropriate when the insurer could not demonstrate compliance with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9b. However, we note that decision is not binding upon ... minimum lawful coverage, satisfy the special coverage selection requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.9b, and not act in a willful, wanton or grossly ...

docket:	A3159-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41174

234 STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. WILLIAM BUTLER -- rank: 462

... has recovered under all bodily injury liability insurance or bonds[.] [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e).] In Bau ter v. Hanover Insurance Company , 247 ... the trial court correctly concluded that, under the part of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 governing the determination of UIM coverage, Butler is not ... provided him with broader UIM coverage than is mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and that the policy can be read to require ...

docket:	a2411-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31169

235 COURT LUIS SANTANA v. JUAN JOSE FLORES -- rank: 462

... by statute in 2007. L. 2007, c. 163, § 1; N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f. (prohibiting step-down clauses in business auto insurance policies ...

docket:	a0773-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28545

236 ALFRED E. TAYLOR VS NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH PA -- rank: 459

... insured's resident family members, reiterating the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, and containing the customary subrogation, settlement and general claims ... namely, anyone occupying a covered auto, by holding that under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e, UIM coverage is personal to the insured. Hence, if ...

docket:	a6596-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-04-23
status:	published
citation:	289 N.J.Super. 593
Document Size:	20752

237 New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. Breen -- rank: 459

... not underinsured with respect to Breen's personal policy. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e.     Breen lived with her parents, Sally and Walter Pilcer ... Breen within the meaning of that term as used in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e. Because Breen "held" UIM coverage greater than the tortfeasor ...

docket:	a-58-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-05-12
status:
citation:	153 N.J. 424
Document Size:	34200

238 SIDNEY HOLMES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 459

... ran into plaintiff was not uninsured within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, we affirm. The facts essential to our disposition are ... did not meet the definition of an uninsured vehicle under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e(2), which provides that an "'[u]ninsured motor vehicle ...

docket:	a3911-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17521

239 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the MANUEL SANCHEZ and YOLANDA SANCHEZ v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, PORFIRIO I RAMON and MARIA E. -- rank: 457

... public vote of its Commissioners authorizing that coverage.4 See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 (requiring auto insurance policies to include UM, but not ...

docket:	a1969-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31309

240 RONALD DANCHISKO v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 454

... N.J. 405 (2005), superseded by statute on other grounds , N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, L. 2007, c. 163, § 2, as recognized in Olkusz ...

docket:	a1428-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63482