Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

256 PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS. CO. VS BRIGHTSTONE WATERPROOFING INC. AND AMERICA FERROLHO -- rank: 431

... Brightstone vehicle is an uninsured motor vehicle under the policy, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e. Additionally, the application of UM coverage to Ferrolho's ... to the legislative policy which inspired the exclusionary language of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e. Thus, the van was an uninsured motor vehicle under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(2)(c) and the policy language.     Thus, we ...

docket:	a2503-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-12-11
status:	published
citation:	295 N.J.Super. 581
Document Size:	5819

257 NORMAN M. CHRISTIE v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 431

... the Financial Responsibility Law of New Jersey is $15,000. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment sought dismissal of ...

docket:	a0642-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-07-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24699

258 MURPHY KNIGHT v. AAA MIDATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 429

... to a provision of a bus insurance policy mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 is "entitled to an award of counsel fees" pursuant ...

docket:	a3621-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-07-05
status:	published
citation:	394 N.J. Super. 333
Document Size:	30966

259 JOSEPH BERGAMO et al. v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 429

... coverage and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage are both codified in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. But there are important distinctions between UM and UIM ...

docket:	a4536-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-14
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30814

260 MIGDALIA SALTERS v. CITIZENS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE -- rank: 426

... arbitration pursuant to the terms of its insurance policy and N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 (setting forth obligations as to the required insurance coverage ... plaintiffs' contention that the policy and statute require UM arbitration. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 ( e)(2)(b) states, in pertinent part, that "uninsured ...

docket:	a1858-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14537

261 LOUIS SCOTT & LAURA WHITAKER VS RONALD A. DEVILLA, ET., AL -- rank: 426

... the language employed by the Legislature in the Deemer provision, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, was inadvertently overbroad and was not intended to restrict ...

docket:	a3534-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-02-15
status:	published
citation:	287 N.J.Super. 370
Document Size:	7294

262 SUSAN KOZICZYNSKI, individually, et al. v. of RONALD JOHNSON, a minor -- rank: 426

... offset from UIM benefits, the panel in McShane relied on N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, holding that the following provisions had "overriding relevance": For ...

docket:	a6535-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	18712

263 FRED & MADELINE WENZ V. ALLSTATE INS. CO. -- rank: 424

... exactly the minimum liability coverage mandated for automobile insurance under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1. Just as we have acknowledged that the average juror ...

docket:	a1958-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-16
status:	published
citation:	316 N.J.Super. 570
Document Size:	26022

264 DENNIS M. BRUSCO v. STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY -- rank: 424

... limitations placed by defendant violate public policy. We disagree. Under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(e)(1), UIM coverage means insurance for damages because ... liability insurance or bonds. Unlike uninsured motorist (UM) coverage, see N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1(a), under the plain language of the UIM statute ...

docket:	a5350-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15274

265 SCOTT RICHARDSON v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 421

... for motor vehicle injuries caused by an unknown driver. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1 and N.J.S.A 39:6-78. Liberty ...

docket:	a5835-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21246

266 GLENN FORD v. NATIONAL INDEPENDENT TRUCKERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 421

... subsequently nullified by the Legislature in 2007 when it enacted N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f. Plaintiff also intimates that Marek may have been impeded ... A-0167-08T3 7 The new statute responding to Pinto, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f. The present case simply is not the UM/UIM ...

docket:	a0167-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-11-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12341

267 DENISE A. HESSER V. HARLEYSVILLE-GARDEN STATE INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 421

... matter we consider whether plaintiff's automobile insurance policy or N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, or both, provided $75,000 uninsured motorist coverage plus ... 000 coverage or a combined single limit of $500,000.          N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1, in the Buyer's Guide and in the Harleysville ...

docket:	a4149-93
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-31
status:	published
citation:	287 N.J.Super. 47
Document Size:	16953

268 JOHN MONTEMURRO v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 419

... decision, the Legislature enacted a statute, which became codified as N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1f, effective September 10, 2007, reversing the Pinto holding and ...

docket:	a1874-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24408

269 RICHARD BREWSTER v. AIG CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 416

... such coverage. Id. at 316. NJM argued that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1b, which provides that UIM coverage cannot exceed the limits ...

docket:	a3644-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-12-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30023

270 LYDIA RODRIGUEZ v. METLIFE AUTO & HOME -- rank: 416

... plaintiffs' complaint. In Tyler , this court interpreted the controlling statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e, and concluded that its "plain meaning . . . is that underinsured ... supra , 228 N.J. Super. at 466. We held that N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e produces the same result if there is one injured ... with approval, followed its reasoning and adopted its interpretation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e. French , supra , 149 N.J. at 483-84. Plaintiffs ...

docket:	a2147-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24780