Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

76 VALERIA HEADEN v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 716

... of the state or any political subdivision or district thereof"); N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 (defining "Governmental" as "the State, its political subdivisions, any ...

docket:	a5947-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-12
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 105 18 A.3d 1072
Document Size:	45258

77 JOHN DAIDONE, et al. v. BUTERICK BULKHEADING, INC., et al. -- rank: 716

... summary judgment dismissing their complaint under the Statute of Repose, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1, governing construction projects. In 1992, plaintiffs retained Scott Lepley ... to the Statute of Repose. I The Statute of Repose, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1, is a limitation on liability for damages stemming from ... A.2d 1 (1968), a year after the enactment of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1. As we have pointed out, the "tendency away from ... J. at 197-98, 293 A. 2d at 665-66). N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 was "a legislative response seeking to delimit th[at ... that the legislature took that trend into account in enacting" N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1, that architects and engineers "are not to be relieved ... the date when the ten-year time-bar matures under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 and the period of repose begins must be ...

docket:	a5652-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-08-15
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	57136

78 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 713

... PPG urges that the six-year limitations period contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, not the twelve-month policy limitation, is applicable to its ... the standard rules of contract construction dictate the conclusion that N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 applies to this action. PPG further maintains that it timely ... this action within the six-year limitation period contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 because it filed suit within six years of the happening ... a state's applicable statute of limitations into play, here, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Defendant insurers, on the other hand, interpret the words to ... statute of limitations for bringing suit on a contract applies. N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. We have held that "[t]he general rule is that ... with New Jersey's statute of limitations because nothing in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 makes it unlawful for the parties to agree to ...

docket:	A2424-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	106397

79 SUZANN FLAMM, v. JEFFREY YOUNG -- rank: 711

... In denying defendant's motion, the court rejected her argument N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 governed the Note and a six-year statute of limitations ...

docket:	a2963-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38056

80 Olds v. Donnelly -- rank: 711

... and well within the six-year limitations period prescribed by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Thus, the statute of limitations also presents no barrier to ...

docket:	a-109-96
court:
decided:	1997-07-16
status:
citation:	150 N.J. 424
Document Size:	128764

81 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4164-09a5344-09.opn.html -- rank: 711

... Goodzeit appropriately applied the six-year statute set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Vastano v. Algeier , 178 N.J. 230 , 233 (2003). "Ordinarily ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	88539

82 HENRY E. RAAB et al. v. BOROUGH OF AVALON -- rank: 708

... taken by inverse condemnation is governed by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 -2, and must be filed within six years from the ... was barred by the six-year statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, because their claims accrued as of April 29, 1965. Specifically ... is now well-settled that the six-year period in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 constitutes the relevant standard. In Russo Farms , we reviewed a ... were subject to the six-year statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Russo Farms , supra , 280 N.J. Super. at 325. In ... the owner and the major tenant. Id. at 67. Applying N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, we held that "[u]ntil the municipal action causing the ... condemnation was barred by the six-year limitation period in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. In so doing, the court specifically rejected the plaintiff' ...

docket:	a6028-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-30
status:	published
citation:	392 N.J. Super. 499
Document Size:	76611

83 Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores -- rank: 706

... relied mistakenly on the six-year limitations period provided by N.J.S.A . 2A:14-1.     Here, the two-year bar of N.J.S.A ... 1993, fall under the general six-year statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Montells , supra , 133 N.J. at 297-98. Although I ...

docket:	a-185-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-05-03
status:
citation:	158 N.J. 263
Document Size:	75253

84 ANGELA PRESTOL v. HENPAL REALTY ASSOCIATES LLC -- rank: 706

... claims were barred by the ten-year statute of repose, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1. In this regard, Suez claimed that 'it performed work ... by the ten-year statute for improvements to property under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1. In doing so, it found that Suez's 2011 ...

docket:	a0633-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53143

85 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0732-20.opn.html -- rank: 706

... 2014). A-0732-20 14 Statute of Limitations and Tolling N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 states: 'Every action at law for . . . any tortious injury to ... of A-0732-20 16 limitations was six years, under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, or twenty years, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A ... their rights. Plaintiffs' claims exceeded the statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 and N.J.S.A 2A:14-7. A-0732 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	43757

86 ATUL SHAH v. BARRY F. JONES -- rank: 703

... 4, rather than the six-year statute of limitations of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. The judge examined the lease and decided to conduct a ... court concluded that the six-year statute of limitations of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 applied as opposed to the sixteen-year statute of limitations ...

docket:	a1188-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25403

87 PATRICIA SOLIMAN v. THE KUSHNER COMPANIES INC -- rank: 703

... barred by the six-year limitation period set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1." 138 N.J. 173 , 175 (1995). The controversy in Rumbauskas ...

docket:	a5397-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-17
status:	published
citation:	433 N.J.Super. 153 77 A.3d 1214
Document Size:	76341

88 RONALD SZIKLA v. 2100 LINWOOD AVENUE OWNERS INC. -- rank: 703

... a rider to the order, the judge noted that under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, actions for property damage must be commenced within six years ... the applicable statute of limitations. As the motion judge noted, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 provides in part that "[e]very action . . . for any tortious ... in the apartment which existed before 2006, were barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 because those claims had not been asserted within six years ... purposes of applying the six-year statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Ibid. The Court explained that the continuing tort doctrine has ... repair work in 2008 and 2009 were not barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Plaintiffs alleged the repair work was negligently performed, and the ... determined that plaintiff's property damage claims are barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 to the extent that such damage pertained to conditions ...

docket:	a0089-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-10-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34869

89 Thomas F. Fox v. Jean Millman -- rank: 703

... 2004, was responsible for generating substantial sales for the company. N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, and (2) defendants could not prove undue delay or prejudice ... was filed within the applicable six-year statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, which made it timely notwithstanding defendants’ invocation of laches. Second ... of a cause of action within six years of accrual, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, that plaintiffs contend should apply to their claims against defendants ... “primary purpose” of “our general statute [of limitations], N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, . . . is to compel the exercise of a right of action ...

docket:	A-39-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2012-06-20
status:
citation:	210 N.J. 401 45 A.3d 332
Document Size:	110705

90 RONALD SZIKLA v. 2100 LINWOOD AVENUE OWNERS INC. -- rank: 703

... a rider to the order, the judge noted that under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, actions for property damage must be commenced within six years ... the applicable statute of limitations. As the motion judge noted, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 provides in part that "[e]very action . . . for any tortious ... in the apartment which existed before 2006, were barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 because those claims had not been asserted within six years ... purposes of applying the six-year statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Ibid. The Court explained that the continuing tort doctrine has ... repair work in 2008 and 2009 were not barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1. Plaintiffs alleged the repair work was negligently performed, and the ... determined that plaintiff's property damage claims are barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 to the extent that such damage pertained to conditions ...

docket:	a0089-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-10-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34858