Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59")   31 to 45 of 477 results. Run time: 0.945 seconds | Search time: 0.938 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 32 Previous 15 Next 15
31 B.F. & K.L.F. VS DIV. OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES -- rank: 674
... trial court for fee sanctions under the Frivolous Pleading Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1. Matter of K.L.F. , 275 N.J. Super ... on plaintiffs' application for sanctions under the Frivolous Pleading Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1:         In fact, through the presentation of its case, DYFS ...
docket: a4632-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-01-15
status: published
citation: 296 N.J.Super. 372
Document Size: 45890
32 JOAQUIN RUIZ v. BRIAN P. STACK -- rank: 674
... pursuant to the New Jersey [f]rivolous [l]itigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15- 59.1.'5 Additionally, Porres appeals from a February 1, 2016 ... under New Jersey's [f]rivolous [l]itigation [s]tatute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1.' As mentioned, the appellate record does not contain the ... pursuant to the New Jersey [f]rivolous [l]itigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1.' We review the motion judge's counsel-fee award ... J. 546, 560 (1993), limiting the imposition of sanctions under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 to parties; [a]ny responsibility for frivolous litigation must ... an application is made by a prevailing defendant pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15- 59.1(b)(2), as it was in this case, 'and ...
docket: a1707-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-15
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 59130
33 ANDREW T. ZIDEL v. LERNER, DAVID -- rank: 672
... a party other than a pro se party pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1.' See R. 1:4-8(f). The trial court ... in law or equity.'' The trial judge al so emphasized N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1) 'explicitly provides[] the determination A-0962-22 ... proceedings.' (Emphasis in original). New Jersey's Frivolous Litigation Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, serves a dual purpose. Toll Bros., Inc. v. Twp ... claim[,] or defense of the non[-]prevailing person was frivolous.' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). A complaint, counterclaim, cross- claim, or defense ... solely for the purpose of harassment, delay[,] or malicious injury,' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b)(1), or if '[t]he non[-]prevailing party ... a party other than a pro se party pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1.' R. 1:4-8(f). In fashioning Rule ...
docket: a0962-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-02-27
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49252
34 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4562-18.opn.html -- rank: 669
... Yishay, filed motions for sanctions under the Frivolous Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, and Rule 1:4-8, which plaintiffs opposed. By ... for counsel fees and sanctions under the frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15- - 59.1, and Rule 1:4-8. We disagree. In his ... found that plaintiffs' claims were not frivolous as defined by N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1. He found that plaintiffs did not bring their claims ... n, 408 N.J. Super. 401, 407 (App. Div. 2009). N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1) provides: A party who prevails in a ... nonprevailing person was frivolous. The term 'frivolous' is defined at N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b), which provides: In order to find that a ... Super. at 408. In general, however, courts should interpret both N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 and Rule 1:4-8 restrictively, recognizing the ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 84524
35 SYLVAN DENTAL, P.A., v. CATHERINE CHEN -- rank: 666
... fees and costs pursuant to Rule 1:4-8 and N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 on the ground that Chen had filed frivolous counterclaims ... 24 Rule 1:4-8 and the frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, authorize sanctions, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs ... cross-claim or defense of the nonprevailing person was frivolous. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1).] To find 'a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] Subsection (b) or Rule 1:4-8 sets ... pleadings.'' Ibid. (citations omitted). '[C]laims against parties pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 must be pursued . . . in accordance with the procedural requirements ... 245 N.J. Super. 17, 31 (App. Div. 1990) (applying N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1). Nonetheless, a pleading cannot be deemed frivolous as ...
docket: a4544-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-08-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 57979
36 DENNIS ACKERMAN v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC -- rank: 666
... to the frivolous litigation statute, 2 A-4629-15T 2 N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1); and by failing to set appropriate terms ... concern for duplicative future litigation costs. The frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, provides: A party who prevails in a civil action ... cross-claim or defense of the nonprevailing person was frivolous. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1).] To find a complaint frivolous, the judge ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] There is no credible evidence in this record ... to be a prevailing party, a requirement for relief under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1), is also without merit. Although 'facts of ... may be deemed to have 'prevailed' for the purposes of [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1]'). The record reflects that plaintiff decided to dismiss ...
docket: a4629-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-11-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18847
37 ROBERT MOTTRAM v. WILLIAM H. BUCKMAN ESQ -- rank: 663
... of whether a pro se attorney could recover fees under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(c). Id. at 16-18. Our colleagues in Brach ...
docket: a1811-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47127
38 ALLIANCE SHIPPERS INC v. CASA DE CAMPO INC. -- rank: 663
... trial court in denying Alliance's request for sanctions under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59-1 or Rule 1:4-8. Frivolous litigation sanctions serve ... 391 N.J. Super. 419, 432 (App. Div. 2007)). Under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, litigation is frivolous when it is 'commenced, used or ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b). Under Rule 1:4-8, a party can ... of existing law' for the litigation to be frivolous under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b) (2). We have carefully reviewed the detailed history ...
docket: a2531-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-10-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30715
39 ROBERT MOTTRAM v. WILLIAM H. BUCKMAN ESQ -- rank: 663
... of whether a pro se attorney could recover fees under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(c). Id. at 16-18. Our colleagues in Brach ...
docket: a5982-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47125
40 HEATHER ALPER v. JOSEPH WOLFSON -- rank: 661
... denying their motion for attorney's fees and sanctions under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 and Rule 1:4-8. In the underlying action ... under the frivolous litigation statute because he failed to consider N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b)(2). Defendants contend that the judge should have ... that a complaint . . . of the non-prevailing person was frivolous.' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). This statute applies only to the conduct ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] '[F]alse allegations of fact [do] not justify ... malicious injury.'' McKeown-Brand, 132 N.J. at 561 (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b)(1)). If the non-prevailing party made 'an ... citing McKeown-Brand, 132 N.J. at 561-62) (discussing N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1). A strict interpretation recognizes 'the principle that citizens ...
docket: a5874-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-12-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23869
41 O.R. v. RICK CAVE -- rank: 655
... on May 3, 2010, relying on Rule l:4-8, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, and N.J.S.A. l0:6-2(f ... for sanctions will follow. R. l:4-8(b)(l). N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.l(a) also provides for attorneys' fees and costs to ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law." N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.l(b)(2). Rule l:4-8 and N.J ...
docket: a5001-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-03-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41914
42 DONNA ROBERTS v. CLIFFORD S. MINTZ -- rank: 655
... to Rule 1:4-8, and against plaintiffs pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1. Although the notice of motion referenced a certification of ... plaintiffs' claims were frivolous under Rule 1:4-8 and N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 because the complaint "was filed without sufficient evidentiary support ... Super. 181 , 193 (App. Div. 2005) (affirming award of sanctions). N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 and Rule 1:4-8 permit a court to ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law." N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b). The Court Rule uses essentially the same standard ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law." N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b)(2). In addition, the court mistakenly exercised its ... under Rule 1:4-8 and against a party under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, it is incumbent upon the court to consider ...
docket: a1563-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-07-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49859
43 MARKET STREET PROFESSIONAL, L.L.C v. MICHAEL J. SANZARI -- rank: 650
... a litigant and its attorney under the Frivolous Litigation Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, and Rule 1:4-8. In 2006, defendant, an ... and your firm pursuant to R. 1:4-8 and N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1. Plaintiff did not withdraw his complaint, and the case ... and the Malagiere law firm under the Frivolous Litigation Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b), and Rule 1:4-8. The trial court ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] Rule 1:4-8(a) provides in pertinent ... stipulated at oral argument that there was no difference between N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b) and Rule 1:4-8(a) as applied ... findings and conclusions should clearly indicate the specific subsection of N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b) or Rule 1:4-8(a) under ...
docket: a4005-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-03-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31831
44 J.O. VS. M.O., M.D. -- rank: 650
... safe harbor notice on J.O.'s counsel pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 and Rule 1:4-8. As a prerequisite to ... ENGAGED IN 'FRIVOLOUS LITIGATION' UNDER [RULE] 1:4-8 OR N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1[.] a. [J.O.'s] Pleadings Were Not Made In ... Sanctions for frivolous litigation against a party are governed by N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, which permits the trial judge to award 'all reasonable ... claim or defense of the non-prevailing person was frivolous.' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). An action is frivolous if: A-1545 ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] The prevailing party's application to the court ... the time spent and services rendered by secretaries and staff[.]' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(c)(1). 'Rule 1:4-8 supplements N. ...
docket: a1545-22
court: appellate
decided: 2024-05-03
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26362
45 JANE DOE, v. JOHN ROE, -- rank: 647
... 3, 2022, award of sanctions against her for violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). We affirm as to the order granting ... two frivolous litigation notices pursuant to Rule1:4-8 and N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1), demanding she withdraw the complaint within twenty ... her counsel for maintaining a frivolous civil action, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). Plaintiff appealed, arguing the trial court erred ... 2002)). Rule 1:4-8 and the frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1, authorize sanctions, including reasonable attorney's fees, against any ... judgment that a complaint ... of the nonprevailing person was frivolous.' N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(a)(1). In order to find a complaint frivolous ... argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1(b).] '[A]n assertion is deemed 'frivolous' when ' ...
docket: a2754-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-03-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32624
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 32 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!