Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

166 KIM K. BROWN v. PETER M. BROWN -- rank: 337

... basic reason for denying defendant's request. In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides that "[n]o payment or installment of an order ...

docket:	a3380-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20631

167 ADRIAN DEWINDT-KING v. STANLEY O. KING -- rank: 337

... An emancipation order does not invoke the retroactive prohibition of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a because the obligation to provide support has ceased as a ...

docket:	a3417-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	38034

168 STEVEN MARK v. MARIA MARK -- rank: 337

... the parent must make a timely application for such relief. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a (prohibiting retroactive modification of child support orders); see Mallamo v ...

docket:	a4370-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	34931

169 MAXIE LEE RIVERS v. LETITIA COX-RIVERS -- rank: 337

... may be retroactive to the date the motion is filed, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, although an emancipation order that requires a retroactive adjustment of ...

docket:	a6803-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-11-16
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	36883

170 SETH DUNN v. JANINE CERRA -- rank: 337

... the mother contribute toward tuition expenses may be limited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which, in general, prohibits the retroactive modification of child support ...

docket:	a4931-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16956

171 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3424-20.opn.html -- rank: 333

... to the original filing date of October 25, 2019. See N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Plaintiff in this case, Kelly Fusco, is the mother of ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	12824

172 DEBORAH N. RIGGS v. ENRICO J. CIARROCCHI -- rank: 333

... at that time calculated to be $23,474, noting that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a prohibited the retroactive modification of his child support obligation. Thereafter ...

docket:	a2340-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-01-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14247

173 MARK T. SWEENEY v. AIME L. SWEENEY, a/k/a AMY L. SWEENEY -- rank: 329

... the termination of alimony presumably should be consistent. And note N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, regarding the non-retroactivity of child support modifications. Paragraph 47 ...

docket:	a4624-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-07-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	39507

174 JENNIFER SOLOMON v. BRIAN SOLOMON -- rank: 321

... erred by failing to address arrears going back to 2007. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, however, prohibits judges from vacating child support arrears which accrue ...

docket:	a5540-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10677

175 FRANK K. SASSO v. DIANE L. DUBINSKI -- rank: 321

... of the application to vacate those arrears was clearly correct. N .J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a prohibits the reduction or elimination of child support arrears. See ...

docket:	A3158-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-11-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27789

176 EILEEN POLNER v. HOWARD POLNER -- rank: 317

... On this appeal, defendant raises the following contentions: POINT I: N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23A, WHICH BARS RETROACTIVE MODIFICATION OF ARREARAGES DOES NOT APPLY TO ...

docket:	A2451-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-09-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26803