Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

61 HELAINE DANDREA v. WILLIAM FLANAGAN -- rank: 518

... support should terminate. However, based upon the anti-retroactivity statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, the judge ordered that child support would be terminated as ... date of the filing of a motion for that relief. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Defendant argues that where there is no legal obligation for ...

docket:	a2266-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30982

62 ROBERT CLEMENT v. ANYSSA C. CLEMENT -- rank: 510

... reduce his child support obligation retroactive to September 2009, citing N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The court also denied without prejudice plaintiff's request for ... termination of his child support obligation. As the court noted, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides, "No payment or installment of an order for child ...

docket:	a0765-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30146

63 MICHELLE WALKER v. FRANCIS WALKER -- rank: 506

... application should not have been denied "on the basis of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a." This point is moot, however, because on reconsideration the judge ...

docket:	A2438-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-09
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	42224

64 KIMBERLY ROBINSON v. ARMANDO ONORATI -- rank: 506

... such relief, or forty-five days earlier upon written notice. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. However, we have previously held that the anti-retroactivity statute ...

docket:	a4687-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41966

65 BARBARA BAKER v. TED H. BAKER -- rank: 506

... the filing date of the motion seeking a reduction, see N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, judges are not prohibited by statute from applying an alimony ...

docket:	a0777-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43152

66 PATRICE T. WARD v. STEPHEN WARD -- rank: 506

... judge was precluded from retroactively modifying child support pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Modifications may be made, however, in "the period during which ... there is a pending application," as was the case here. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The question of defendant's weekly child support obligation has ...

docket:	a4414-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-01-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	30730

67 JOEL A. FRIEDMAN v. MICHELLE P. FRIEDMAN -- rank: 506

... limited to the filing date of defendant's motion. See N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a ("No . . . portion[] of an order which [is] allocated for child ... is justified in light of the anti-retroactivity provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. In Points 4 and 6, defendant argues that the judge ...

docket:	a0618-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25975

68 JULIE STINE v. DUNCAN CRANNELL -- rank: 502

... paid until he filed the cross-motion for reduction. See N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a (prohibiting retroactive modification of orders for child support except for ... must pay arrearages in child support and if not, why N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a does not prohibit the enforcement of such retroactive relief. The ...

docket:	a1701-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27184

69 WILLIAM K. BISCHOFF v. DIANE K. BISCHOFF -- rank: 497

... filing date of plaintiff's modification motion in July 2008. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a states, in relevant part: "No payment or installment of an ...

docket:	a4929-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	58388

70 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5884-17.opn.html -- rank: 497

... 7, 2016 motion. Such an application, however, is limited by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a which provides that '[n]o payment or installment of an ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	78051

71 JOHN RUSSITANO, JR v. MELISSA RUSSITANO -- rank: 497

... reject Melissa's argument, for it misapprehends the purpose of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. 4 It has been emphasized time and time again that ... the bench warrant, but did not reinstate child support. 4 N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a states, in relevant part: "No payment or installment of an ...

docket:	a1489-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27205

72 ACBSS1 YASHAMIRA SANDERS v. ALEXANDER HERNANDEZ -- rank: 493

... of Social Services also argues "retroactive modification of arrears" violates N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a and "is contrary to public policy." Findings by a trial ... of Manalapan , 140 N.J. 366 , 378 (1995). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, "[n]o payment or installment of an order for child ...

docket:	a4731-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22122

73 KENNETH MULLARNEY v. KRISTEN MULLARNEY -- rank: 493

... Retroactive modification of child support orders is prohibited by statute. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides: No payment or installment of an order for child ... effective date should be September 8, 2009, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, or August 1, 2009, because the parties agreed on that ...

docket:	a0980-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22720

74 CAROL PETERSON v. FRANK CAFFREY -- rank: 489

... the statutory bar to retroactive modification of child support orders, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Because of significant voids in the record and disputes of ... itself be vacated. Additionally, she argued that the effect of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a was to bar application of the doctrine of laches. Peterson ...

docket:	a0002-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19494

75 PATRICIA RITCHIE v. MARK MILLER -- rank: 489

... 2004 directing child support payments for Sarah was invalid under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which prohibits retroactive modification of child support orders, and that ... defendant's first argument, for it misapprehends the purpose of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The statute is intended to benefit the child, not the ...

docket:	a3007-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15434