Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

166 RONALD C. REESE v. REBECCA WEIS -- rank: 576

... to be weighed when reviewing a claim for alimony. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (detailing a non-exclusive list of factors considered when determining ... supra , 83 N.J. at 146 (citation omitted). See also N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (stating alimony orders "may be revised and altered by the ... alimony awards "as circumstances may require" is clearly defined in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Moreover, alimony orders must be modified as "the circumstances of ... based on the economic facts and other circumstances defined in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, so too, Family Part judges must make findings regarding whether ... request for counsel fees was erroneous. We disagree. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, [w]henever [an] . . . application is made to a court which ...

docket:	a5557-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-07
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 552 66 A.3d 157
Document Size:	87949

167 WENDY L. CRESCENZO v. JOHN CRESCENZO -- rank: 576

... court concluded: Using these numbers and the other factors under [ N.J.S.A.] 2A:34-23(b)1-13, previously addressed, a yearly alimony figure of ...

docket:	a2615-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32407

168 DAVID P. CANNELL v. BARBARA J. CANNELL -- rank: 576

... clearly delineated and specific findings addressing the statutory factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 for his determination of discretionary child support. The parties were ... his determination of the needs of the child based upon N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a). A trial judge has broad discretion in reviewing an ... 373 N.J. Super. 464 , 470 (App. Div. 2004) (citing N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23). "Whether an alimony obligation should be modified based upon a ... the Guidelines or provide any reason why the Guidelines and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 should not apply. We agree with defendant that they are ... the Guidelines, the court must consider the factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a). Caplan v. Caplan , 182 N.J. 250 , 271 (2005 ... determine the discretionary child support using the statutory factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) and to articulate the reasons for his findings ...

docket:	a4514-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23650

169 BARBARA POULARD VS. LUCIEN POULARD, JR. -- rank: 574

... N.J. Super. 1, 6 (App. Div. 2000). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1: In making an equitable distribution of property, the court ... p. Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.] Before fixing an equitable distribution award, the trial court ... and which property, if any, belongs separately to either spouse. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 ('[T]he court shall make specific findings of fact ... during the marriage is marital property subject to equitable distribution. N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23.1 ('It shall be a rebuttable presumption that each party ... this distribution as it relates to the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. In reaching this conclusion, we discern no reason to ... and more fully address the statutory factors set forth under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1—including the dissipation factor set forth under N. ...

docket:	a2941-21
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28395

170 BRENDEN RUH v. JACQUELINE VAN CLEEF -- rank: 574

... and remand for further factual findings and an analysis of N.J.S.A. 2A:34- -23(a) and the applicable case law. I. We set forth ... child on her health insurance, and failed to assess the N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) factors in calculating the above the Guidelines child support ... to provide for the financial support of their unemancipated children. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a). The State has established presumptive Guidelines, and a corresponding ... figure with a supplemental award subject to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) . . . .' Pascale v. Pascale, 140 N.J. 583, 595 (1995). A-2468-18T4 9 N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) directs a court to consider the following factors in ... to the amount of additional support determined through analyzing the N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 factors. [Caplan, 182 N.J. at 271.] In Isaacson ...

docket:	a2468-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27263

171 LINDA J. JURGENS v. WILLIAM C. JURGENS JR -- rank: 574

... permanent alimony, rehabilitative alimony, limited duration alimony or reimbursement alimony. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). The purpose of alimony is the continuation of the ... 13) Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b).] Where there is a request for an award of ... in those cases where permanent alimony would otherwise be awarded. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c).] Rehabilitative alimony "shall be awarded based upon a plan ... including a period of employment during which rehabilitation will occur." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(d). It permits a short-term award to enable the ... a level where limited duration alimony is no longer appropriate." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c). However, limited duration alimony is inappropriate in cases when ... 392 N.J. Super. 215 , 223 (App. Div. 2007). Under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(h), upon divorce, a court may provide for the ...

docket:	a0945-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43894

172 GRZEGORZ WAJDA v. SYLWIA WAJDA -- rank: 571

... The judge noted both parties acknowledged in the MSA that N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 applied, and, '[a]ssuming, for argument's sake, that the ... 171 N.J. 561, 571 (2002)). A-3461-18T3 6 N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) includes a non-exhaustive list of factors the court ... J. at 197). In 2014, 'the Legislature adopted amendments to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, designed to more clearly quantify considerations examined when faced with ... N.J. Super. 529, 536–37 (App. Div. 2015). Specifically, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n) states that alimony may be 'terminated' if the dependent ... parties 'maintain a single A-3461-18T3 9 common household.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n). In Konzelman, however, the Court stated that cohabitation required ... undertaken duties and privileges that are commonly associated with marriage[,]' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n) — based solely on the documents filed by ...

docket:	a3461-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20556

173 GLEN SMILEY v. LAURIE SHEEDY -- rank: 571

... and remand for discovery consistent with the factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n) and a plenary hearing. The parties were married on ... presently cohabiting and did not intend to in the future. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 allows for alimony awards in appropriate circumstances. In Lepis v ... moving party presents a prima facie case demonstrating changed circumstances. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n) was amended, effective September 2014, to clarify that evidence ... that are commonly associated with marriage or a civil union.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n). A-2693-20 3 alimony should be terminated due ... s involvement in a committed dating relationship akin to marriage. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n), states as follows: Alimony may be suspended or terminated ... to offer evidence about the financial aspects referred to in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n). [Temple, 468 N.J. Super. at 370 (emphasis ...

docket:	a2693-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17266

174 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2004-18.opn.html -- rank: 571

... was entitled to relief under Rule 4:50-1 and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c). She also sought payment for child support arrears, as ... make findings concerning plaintiff's alternative request for relief under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c). Accordingly, we remand to allow the judge to A ... the duration of alimony, pursuant to Rule 4:50-1, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) or on the grounds that enforcing the PSA would ... did not consider plaintiff's alternative basis for relief, under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c), believing that the statute was not in effect when ... alimony obligation because plaintiff established unusual circumstances as required under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c), and the PSA's anti-Lepis provision was unconscionable ... modify the length of the term except in unusual circumstances. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) (emphasis added).] See Gonzalez-Posse v. Ricciardulli, 410 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17973

175 BONNIE D. CLARK v. KENNETH B. CLARK -- rank: 571

... time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient education or training," N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(8), the judge observed that defendant "clearly needs training ... conclusions." Curtis v. Finneran , 83 N.J. 563 , 570 (l980). N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) authorizes a family court to "award one or more ... 13) Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b).] "The purpose of rehabilitative alimony is to exert fair ... defendant's counterclaim and contrary to the express requirement of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(d), which requires a "plan in which the payee shows ... sought"). Defendant did, in fact, generally request alimony pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 in his counterclaim. It is not fatal to his claim ...

docket:	a5521-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	73220

176 TRACEY EMOLO v. JOHN C. EMOLO -- rank: 569

... 1999, c. 199, § 1 (eff. September 13, 1999) (amending N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) to add LDA). Because the PSA was executed in ... 335 N.J. Super. 465 , 476-83 (App. Div. 2000); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c), facts that are not present in this case. Finally ... statute's other factors when considering the amount of support. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(1) to (13). Again, without the precision we would ...

docket:	a3836-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	127565

177 ROY E. NARISH v. BETTY NARISH -- rank: 569

... pay; and the tax consequences of the alimony award, citing N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (b)(1), (11) and (12). Plaintiff also argues that the ... of income tax returns may render a hearing unnecessary. Ibid. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) sets forth a variety of factors for the court ... a portion of the payment as a non-taxable payment. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b).] Thus, when presented with a motion for downward alimony ... is treated as an asset for purposes of equitable distribution. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). Here, no one disputes, and the court properly found ... in deciding the amount of alimony, if any, guided by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Of course, in making these fact-findings, full disclosure by ... event, the court must consider and make specific findings under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), including an evaluation of defendant's needs and ...

docket:	a0006-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27026

178 RICHARD BENNETT v. CHERYL BENNETT -- rank: 569

... 34-23a, N.J.S.A. 2a:34-23b, and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 on the current circumstances of the parties and children ... the court must also consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, and any other relevant factor" when determining "the supplemental support ... fees charged during the relevant post-judgment proceedings. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 and R. 5:3-5(c) authorize the award of ...

docket:	A0939-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-06-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	111521

179 TRACEY EMOLO v. JOHN C. EMOLO -- rank: 569

... 1999, c. 199, § 1 (eff. September 13, 1999) (amending N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) to add LDA). Because the PSA was executed in ... 335 N.J. Super. 465 , 476-83 (App. Div. 2000); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c), facts that are not present in this case. Finally ... statute's other factors when considering the amount of support. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(1) to (13). Again, without the precision we would ...

docket:	a2746-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	127563

180 GALE L. PICCIONE v. CHARLES S. PICCIONE -- rank: 569

... v. Innes, A-4376-19 10 where the Court discussed N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, which states, '[w]hen a share of a retirement benefit ... alimony.' 117 N.J. 496, 505 (1990) (emphasis added) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)). The Court found '[t]he plain language of the ... this asset [is] improper.' Id. at 514. The language from N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 the Court interpreted in Innes has no application here. The provision in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 cited by the Court in Innes prohibits consideration of the ... purposes of equitable distribution only in the determination of alimony. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). In its June 5, 2020 and July 24, 2020 ... in its determination of an attorney's fee award). Neither N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 nor the Court's decision in Innes prohibits consideration ...

docket:	a4376-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-09
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26497