Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23")   211 to 225 of 1156 results. Run time: 0.802 seconds | Search time: 0.795 seconds    
 Page:1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 78 Previous 15 Next 15
211 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/tax/a5538-13a1020-14a4572-14a5442-14.opn.html -- rank: 551
... in plaintiff's income. He systematically applied the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) to determine the amount of support. Lacking information about ... in excess of $187,200) and the factors specified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Thus, the maximum guidelines award in Appendix IX-F [$571 ... the 400 to 450 range," he nonetheless correctly applied the N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) factors. Since the judge did not have plaintiff's ... and "earning ability of each parent . . ." was necessarily impaired. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a)(3), (4). Certainly, the failure to include $16,800 ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 67917
212 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5057-18.opn.html -- rank: 551
... the trial court's award of alimony was inconsistent with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) because it allegedly results in plaintiff having a greater ... to consider and weigh all of the relevant factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34- -23 in determining the amount and length of the alimony award ... an analysis of the statutory factors[,]' as set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(b). Cox v. Cox, 335 N.J. Super. 465, 478 ... alimony[,] limited duration alimony or reimbursement alimony to either party. ' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). 'Limited duration alimony is available to a dependent spouse ... 2005) (quoting Cox, 335 N.J. Super. at 483). Furthermore, N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(c) provides in pertinent part that '[f]or any marriage ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 38131
213 J.L. v. B.L. -- rank: 549
... 2A:17-56.67 was enacted, the Legislature left intact N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a), which provides: The obligation to pay support for a ... of the child. [Ibid. (emphasis supplied).] 3 The factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) are: (1) the needs of the child; (2) the ... or physical incapacity, the court must consider the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a). Additionally, 'the court shall consider . . . the child's eligibility ... proceedings. The trial court did not consider the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(a) before it ordered defendant to pay $203 per week ...
docket: a4623-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18758
214 J.E.V v. K.V. -- rank: 549
... Judge Jacobson considered the thirteen alimony factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). The judge found permanent alimony was not warranted in ... fee award. Limited duration alimony is expressly permitted by statute. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) provides: In any case in which there is a ... on the evidence about the above factors [set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)]. If the court determines that an award of permanent ... where limited duration alimony is no longer appropriate. According to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(f), nothing in the statute "shall be construed to limit ... of fees awarded. Affirmed. 1 Prior to the enactment of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(f), the statute did not permit a judge to award ...
docket: a2933-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-06-21
status: published
citation: 426 N.J. Super. 475 45 A.3d 1001
Document Size: 50856
215 JUSTIN MANLEY v. SUZANNE MANLEY -- rank: 549
... two out of the seven factors under the cohabitation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n). The judge concluded there was no evidence 'of intertwined ... the court from time to time as circumstances may require.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. A motion addressed to termination or suspension of alimony requires ... couple does not live together on a full-time basis. [N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n).] Recently, this court held a party seeking to terminate ... on cohabitation need not 'check off all six boxes [under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n)] to meet the burden of presenting a prima facie ...
docket: a0408-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-01-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21427
216 K.M.L. (n/k/a K.M.Z v. R.J.L -- rank: 549
... the debt.' Under equitable distribution, the statutory factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, 'used in concert with the facts of each case ... The trial judge applied the equitable distribution factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and determined: Plaintiff proposes that she will retain her ... fees because it 'did not satisfy the requirements outlined in' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, Rule 5:3-5(c), and Rule 4:42-9 ... Mani v. Mani, 183 N.J. 70, 94- 95 (2005); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (providing that the judge 'shall consider the factors set forth ...
docket: a4423-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-10-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61778
217 MICHAEL A. ZAMORSKY v. JOYCE P. ZAMORSKY -- rank: 549
... or either of them during the marriage or civil union." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(h). "The goal of equitable distribution . . . is to effect a ... court must apply the fifteen statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. See Giovine v. Giovine , 284 N.J. Super. 3 ... assets, and any other factors deemed relevant by the court. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The end result must reflect that "the trial judge . . . appl[ied] all the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and distribute[d] the marital assets consistent with the ... acquisition of income and property while the party was married." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Even so, "neither party is automatically entitled to fifty ... to the value of the property during the marriage. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The trial judge reasonably determined that, although the ...
docket: a2450-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-07-15
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 27884
218 T1THOMAS BROWN v. THELMA B. BROWN -- rank: 547
... set forth in subsections (j)(1) and (j)(3) of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 bear upon this case. Subsection (j)(1) provides: There shall ... good cause shown, the court determines that alimony should continue[.] [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(1).] Although plaintiff relied on this subsection in the ... is subsection (j)(3). Landers , supra , slip op. at 2. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(3) states that: When a retirement application is filed ... s separate argument that he is entitled to relief under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) because the number of years that he has been ... exceed the length of the parties' marriage. For one thing, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c), which establishes a presumption that alimony awards for marriages ... April 23, 2015. That order has not been appealed. 4 N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 states that retirement age is "the age at which ...
docket: a2802-14
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-05-05
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 29773
219 JIHAD SLIM v. LINA SLIM -- rank: 547
... the court from time to time as circumstances may require." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Thus, alimony obligations, whether set in judicial orders or parties ...
docket: a1173-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-11-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52306
220 ALLAN R. WILLIAMS v. HEATHER B.N. WILLIAMS -- rank: 547
... the A-2003-20 9 statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). Steneken v. Steneken, 367 N.J. Super. 427, 434 ... the award is 'fit, reasonable and just' to both parties, N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23, and properly balances each party's needs, the finite marital ... resources, and the parties' desires to commence their separate futures, N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23[(]c[)].' Gnall v. Gnall, 432 N.J. Super. 129, 149 ... appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property . . . .' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(i). 'Dissipation may be found where a spouse uses ...
docket: a2003-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-01-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28577
221 ISABELLA BLUMBERG v. GIRSH BLUMBERG -- rank: 547
... Girsh to pay weekly $285 for their daughter. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a), the court established a weekly support obligation of $75 ... alimony, the judge appropriately considered the criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), and for equitable distribution, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Thus we do not reweigh the evidence based on ...
docket: a5405-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-08-24
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 80407
222 C.M.E v. M.E -- rank: 547
... quotations omitted)). A judge must consider the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23 in determining the amount of child support to be paid ... or 12 The statutory factors a judge must consider under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) include: (1) Needs of the child; (2) Standard of ... educational and employment history, and their financial circumstances, consistent with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a), and he established a child support award pursuant to ...
docket: a3545-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-09-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 56612
223 S.W v. G.M. -- rank: 547
... trial judge awarded defendant permanent alimony utilizing the version of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) that existed before its amendment in September 2014. . . . The ... was a misapplication of law because it ignored Crews and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(4), which requires a judge consider '[t]he standard ... that standard of living than the other.' To be clear, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(4) does not signal the Legislature intended income equalization ... life insurance determination for reconsideration. The judg e relied on N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(1), which states: 'There shall be a rebuttable presumption ...
docket: a1278-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-24
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 33637
224 CLARENCE SEALS v. MIA MOORE SEALS -- rank: 544
... child] AND DID NOT ADEQUATELY CONSIDER OR EXPLAIN FACTORS UNDER N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(a) FOR FAMILIES WITH INCOMES EXCEEDING NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ... regarding equitable distribution, it listed the sixteen factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. We reiterate the discussion. Specifically, regarding factor six—'[t ... salary of $224,000, w ith the potential for bonuses. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(f). The court imputed income of $58,000 to ...
docket: a5856-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-02-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23407
225 IRINA B. ELGART v. MICHAEL ELGART -- rank: 544
... ANY CONSIDERATION OF THE STATUTORY CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(A) CONSTITUTED PLAIN ERROR. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ... alternatively, should have applied the statutory criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) because the parties' combined income exceeded $187,200. She ... in excess of $187,200) and the factors specified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Thus, the maximum guidelines award in Appendix IX-F represents ... supra , Appendix IX-A to R.  5:6A at 2645.] N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) provides that the court shall consider, but not be ... it reflect consideration of the statutory criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) for discretionary above-guideline child support awards. We have ... supra , Appendix IX-A to R. 5:6A at 2645; N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. This combined approach should result in a fair award ...
docket: a2576-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-09-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34779
 Page:1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 78 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!