Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

481 FRANCES CASO v. FERNANDO GUERRERO -- rank: 435

... J. 149 (1983), as well as the amended alimony statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, to conclude that "the evidence presented at the hearing proved ... authorizes suspension or termination of alimony once cohabitation is established. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n). Changed circumstances resulting from a dependent spouse's cohabitation ...

docket:	a3649-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38230

482 D.C. v. J.C. -- rank: 435

... her reply brief, defendant disputes the judge's application of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(13) in respect of retroactively modifying the support and ... plaintiff had. The judge considered the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(13) by explaining in her decision that pendente lite ... or bad faith of either party.' A-3530-15T2 11 N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Application of these factors and the decision to award fees ...

docket:	a3530-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23271

483 KENNETH MITCHEM v. DELISHIA MITCHEM -- rank: 435

... making findings of fact on equitable distribution as required by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The parties were married on April 4, 2010, and ... court did not explicitly state her findings as required by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Defendant does not challenge the substantive provisions of the ...

docket:	a5795-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12029

484 ANITA SEIGEL v. NORMAN SUTTA -- rank: 435

... On appeal, defendant argues that the judge failed to analyze N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(3) and make the appropriate findings regarding his changed circumstances. Relying on N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(j)(3), defendant maintains that his retirement constitutes a changed ... has demonstrated that modification or termination of alimony is appropriate.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(j)(3). It is undisputed that alimony orders 'may be ... the court from time to time as circumstances may require.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Thus, alimony obligations, whether set in judicial orders or parties ...

docket:	a3526-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15921

485 JOSEPH F. HAYES v. CHRISTINA M. STALLINGS -- rank: 435

... other than an application based on retirement filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(2) and (j)(3), the movant shall append copies ...

docket:	a2762-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31592

486 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2675-19.opn.html -- rank: 435

... 253 N.J. Super. 531, 542 (App. Div. 1992) (citing N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23). 'Settlement of disputes, including matrimonial disputes, is encouraged and highly ... either party by way of gift, devise, or intestate succession.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(h). If separate property is commingled, it will be treated ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	68156

487 M.M v. J.M -- rank: 433

... the following specific language regarding alimony: 8.1 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, the parties have considered the factors with respect to spousal ...

docket:	a3758-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19047

488 A-5590-11T4 KATHLEEN CROGHAN v. JOSEPH CROGHAN -- rank: 433

... to the extent this consideration is reasonable, just and fair[.]" N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(10). However, the Legislature has enacted only one provision ... generated thereafter by that share for purposes of determining alimony." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). That provision codified the holding in D'Oro v ...

docket:	a2389-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	64430

489 JOSEPH J. GORMLEY, III v. SUSAN CANNAVO GORMLEY -- rank: 433

... then for higher income families, apply the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) to calculate an additional discretionary amount to be added ... inapplicable . . . the court should consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 or N.J.S.A. 9:17-53 when establishing ... to establish the Guideline amount, apply the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 or N.J.S.A. 9:17-53, and then ...

docket:	a1428-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34201

490 WILFREDO CORDERO v. WANDA MORA -- rank: 433

... the court from time to time as circumstances may require." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. The moving party bears the burden to make a prima ... the education and other abilities demonstrated by the moving party. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. The judge must also consider the assets of the moving ...

docket:	a0171-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34561

491 DORA G. HYDUK v. MICHAEL HYDUK -- rank: 433

... home and that plaintiff had rebutted the statutory presumption of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 "that each party made a substantial financial or non ... issue to be addressed is alimony. Alimony is authorized by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 and is governed by the factors enumerated in 380 N ... obligations imposed by a Judgment of Divorce is discretionary. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (noting that a court "may" provide for security for financial ...

docket:	a5578-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-01
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	82737

492 SYLVIA STEINER v. DAVID S. STEINER -- rank: 433

... advanced by the parties both during and prior to trial'); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (allowing a court to award counsel fees in a divorce ...

docket:	a2440-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48628

493 KATHLEEN CROGHAN v. JOSEPH CROGHAN -- rank: 433

... to the extent this consideration is reasonable, just and fair[.]" N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(10). However, the Legislature has enacted only one provision ... generated thereafter by that share for purposes of determining alimony." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). That provision codified the holding in D'Oro v ...

docket:	a5590-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	65463

494 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1569-14.opn.html -- rank: 430

... judge. Williams v. Williams , 59 N.J. 229 , 233 (1971); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23; R.  5:3 5(c). In matters in the Family ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	44800

495 PAUL ROSENBERG v. REESA ROSENBERG -- rank: 430

... support orders 'from time to time as circumstances may require.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. A support order may be subject to review and modification ...

docket:	a2331-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23532