Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

166 ANTOINETTE CHANDLER v. AARON CHANDLER -- rank: 449

... Div. 1981) (citation omitted), superseded by statute on other grounds , N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, as recognized in Mallamo v. Mallamo , 280 N.J ...

docket:	a1775-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-01-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43890

167 ACBSS1 YASHAMIRA SANDERS v. ALEXANDER HERNANDEZ -- rank: 446

... of Social Services also argues "retroactive modification of arrears" violates N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a and "is contrary to public policy." Findings by a ... of Manalapan , 140 N.J. 366 , 378 (1995). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, "[n]o payment or installment of an order for ...

docket:	a4731-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22122

168 MICHAEL DOBLIN v. LINDA DOBLIN - -- rank: 446

... mandatory and statutory review of child support called for under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.9[a] . . . ." The arbitrator found that "at the time of ... ruling was based upon the pre-1998 amendment version of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.9a." Martin v. Martin , 410 N.J. Super. 1, 2 ...

docket:	a6161-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23386

169 JOYCE C. GOORE v. HAMLET E. GOORE, JR -- rank: 443

... May 7, 2010, the date he filed his motion. See N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a (specifying that retroactive modification of child support shall be ...

docket:	a3788-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38235

170 KENNETH MULLARNEY v. KRISTEN MULLARNEY -- rank: 443

... Retroactive modification of child support orders is prohibited by statute. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a provides: No payment or installment of an order for ... effective date should be September 8, 2009, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, or August 1, 2009, because the parties agreed on ...

docket:	a0980-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22720

171 ELLEN WING v. FELIPE NOGUERA -- rank: 443

... this particular credit offensive to the anti-retroactivity policies of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Lastly, the father urges that his child support should ...

docket:	a1505-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56199

172 DEBORAH N. RIGGS v. ENRICO J. CIARROCCHI, JR -- rank: 440

... vacate the arrears. In so doing, Judge Rand relied on N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23A, which prohibits the retroactive modification of child support arrears ... that have accumulated since November 2006. As plaintiff correctly argues, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23A prohibits the retroactive vacating or modification of accumulated child ...

docket:	a5538-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-30
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33807

173 LAURIE GRAULICH v. ROBERT STOCHEL -- rank: 440

... constitute a retroactive modification of child support in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Bowens v. Bowens , 286 N.J. Super. 70 , 73 ...

docket:	a6285-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	46162

174 CAROL PETERSON v. FRANK CAFFREY -- rank: 436

... the statutory bar to retroactive modification of child support orders, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. Because of significant voids in the record and disputes ... itself be vacated. Additionally, she argued that the effect of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a was to bar application of the doctrine of laches ...

docket:	a0002-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19494

175 PAULA YANNUZZI v. JOHN YANNUZZI -- rank: 436

... pursuant to Rule 5:7-5(g) ("In accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, past-due child support payments are a judgment by ...

docket:	a5762-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-07
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	70034

176 PATRICIA RITCHIE v. MARK MILLER -- rank: 436

... 2004 directing child support payments for Sarah was invalid under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which prohibits retroactive modification of child support orders, and ... defendant's first argument, for it misapprehends the purpose of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a. The statute is intended to benefit the child, not ...

docket:	a3007-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15434

177 ROBERT KIRSCH Cross- v. CHERYL M GILAN-SLANSKY -- rank: 433

... him full time. To the extent that defendant argues that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a prohibits a retroactive modification of child support, we disagree ... the date of the New York custody order, without implicating N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, is akin to emancipation, where a court-ordered change ...

docket:	a3006-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-12-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18778

178 MELISSA MORALES v. JULIO MORALES -- rank: 433

... the judge could not order retroactive child support pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a (providing that "[n]o payment or installment of an ...

docket:	a4977-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28044

179 MIGUEL A. MEJIA v. JUANA MEJIA -- rank: 433

... only from the date the notice of motion was mailed[.]" N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). In this case, the court made the retroactive ... overcome the legal limitations found in the anti-retroactivity statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), and plaintiff's incomplete filings. Affirmed. 1 We ...

docket:	a2412-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18731

180 CAROLINE KENT v. JOEL KENT -- rank: 433

... As the judge stated, child support cannot be retroactively diminished. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a states in pertinent part that "[n]o payment or ...

docket:	a4104-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18332