Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

331 DAVID PIPITONE v. DINA PIPITONE -- rank: 492

... decision. After a detailed consideration of the applicable statutory factors, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(1)-(13), including the parties' respective current and future ...

docket:	a0449-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40828

332 S.K v. N.L -- rank: 490

... Rule 4:42-9(a), Rule 5:3-5(c), N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, and interpretative case law 'clearly outline necessary considerations when imposing ... In exercising its discretion, the trial court must abide by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, requiring consideration of 'the factors set forth in the court ... of either party.' Mani, 183 N.J. at 94 (quoting N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23). Rule 5:3-5(c), in turn, requires the trial ... Rules 4:42-9(a), 5:3-5(c), or N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Although all factors should have been considered, particularly relevant here ...

docket:	a3325-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33853

333 ELIZABETH COHEN v. MATTHEW COHEN -- rank: 490

... restating applicable legal principles. Support following divorce is governed by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. It provides in pertinent part that ". . . after judgment of divorce ... nature of the case shall render fit, reasonable and just . . ." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, the trial judge is vested with broad authority to divide ... educational fund for the children. We disagree. As stated above, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 explicitly authorizes the court to make such order as to ... allocation of assets for care, maintenance and education of children, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 is not so broad as to authorize gifts from one ...

docket:	a6659-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-03-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	55289

334 WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM v. ARLENE CUNNINGHAM -- rank: 490

... assets. The court then considered the statutory factors prescribed by N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, and allocated the assets accordingly. Noting, among other things ... nature of the case shall render fit, reasonable and just." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. In doing so, the court must consider, among other things ... of the retirement accounts, which totaled over $800,000. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 ("When a share of a retirement benefit is treated as ...

docket:	A3176-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70715

335 KRISTEN CARDELL v. PATRICK KIRBY -- rank: 490

... s basic [minimum] order by applying the New Jersey annotated [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23] factors with the needs of the child as the paramount ... Court [ must ] add a discretionary amount under the factors [in N.J.S.A. 2A:]34-23. It appears clear to the Court that all of the ...

docket:	a1398-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-12-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47288

336 Robert B. Crews, Jr. v. Barbara D. Crews -- rank: 490

... that [t]he trial judge appropriately considered the statutory factors, N.J.S.A.  2A:34-23(b), and established an alimony award consistent with Mrs. Crews ... decision held that the appropriate statutory factors, set forth in N.J.S.A.  2A:34-23(b), had been considered when setting the alimony award. Also ...

docket:	a-20-99
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2000-05-31
status:
citation:	164 N.J. 11
Document Size:	64338

337 ANDREA MAGALHAES v. THOMAS RUSSO -- rank: 490

... college. Defendant asserts that the statutory factors set forth under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 should have been utilized. Under the Child Support Guidelines - Appendix ... trial court was not obliged to use the guidelines under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Since we are remanding the issue of calculating the amount ... child support guidelines or to utilize the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Defendant next argues that the trial court erred in not ...

docket:	a0752-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29098

338 MICHAEL R. JONES v. MARY BETH JONES -- rank: 490

... an order of the same date. Judge McBride explained that N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) proscribes extending the term of limited duration alimony except ... and did not exempt her from the applicable requirements of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c). Following oral argument on August 31, 2012, Judge McBride ... See Lepis , supra , 83 N.J. at 157. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c): An award of alimony for a limited duration may ... part because it was decided prior to the amendment of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 that added the requirement of unusual circumstances to be present ...

docket:	a0238-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32299

339 RACHNA SINGH v. SANDEEP SAINI -- rank: 487

... on other grounds , 183 N.J. 290 (2005). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), a court considers the following factors in establishing an ... 13) Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b).] In an abbreviated fashion, the trial judge engaged in ... of the awarded limited duration alimony is subject to reduction. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23; Lepis v. Lepis , 83 N.J. 139 , 149 (1980) (observing ... in line with the public policy behind the statute. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 (granting courts the authority to fashion orders for alimony and ... the judge's discretion, taking account relevant statutory factors. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b). As to the annual bonus, however, although the court ...

docket:	a4382-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-01-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20557

340 DEAN MARCANTONIO v. CHRISTINE MARCANTONIO -- rank: 487

... The court did not expressly apply the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 or Jacoby , supra , 427 N.J. Super. at 121-22 ... the court was required to apply the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a), which governs support obligations for college students living away ... a local residence during breaks, ibid. , or the parents' incomes. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a). Further, the court did not scrutinize the living expenses ... obligation to support the child of his new marriage. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a)(10). 6 On the other hand, it appears that ...

docket:	a1822-14
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27030

341 BECKY LIN v. STANLEY LIU -- rank: 487

... underemployed; and failing to consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(k). A-0682-22 7 II. 'We accord deference to ... v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 146 (1980)). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, an alimony order 'may be revised and altered by the ... the application based upon all of the [statutory] enumerated factors.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(k) (emphasis added). The judge did not consider and make ... and (9) '[w]hether a temporary remedy should be fashioned.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(k). A-0682-22 14 Additionally, if underemployed is found ...

docket:	a0682-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30760

342 JILL SHEINBAUM v. ROBERT CAMPBELL -- rank: 485

... parties, and the good or bad faith of either party." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. In a family action, Rule 4:42-9(a)(1 ... the parties and the nature of the case" make necessary. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. Here, the court found that Weiss had a pro-defendant ...

docket:	a5174-06
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	61040

343 A-0JAMES R. HAPPOLD v. JEAN HASHER HAPPOLD -- rank: 485

... as the trial court also inadequately considered the statutory factors, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), we remanded for additional fact-finding by a different ... a portion of the payment as a non-taxable payment." N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b)(12). The court simply acknowledged that the alimony will ... assess, tax consequences of alimony, among other things); see also N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(c) (stating that the court shall "make specific findings on ...

docket:	a4700-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	57500

344 SEAN K. MCNAMARA v. ANCA MCNAMARA -- rank: 485

... 2012). We must hew to that standard of review. Under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(h), a court may award the parties "an equitable distribution ... of the protection intended to continue during their marriage under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23." Id. at 222. "A rule that allows one spouse to ...

docket:	a1271-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41901

345 LESLIE SMITH v. BETTE R. GRAYSON -- rank: 485

... entitled to permanent alimony based on the applicable factors of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, including the length of the marriage, the age of the ... in her report, the expert analyzed all applicable factors of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 relevant in this instance to the determination of the type ... awarded absent a clear statement of reasons to the contrary, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b), (c). Id. at 483. Most tellingly, the expert added ... the expert opined that in applying the pertinent factors of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 and the rationale of Cox , a court would award permanent ...

docket:	a1460-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64943