Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 PAULA J. FINNE v. WILLIAM FINNE -- rank: 555

... marital assets instead of applying the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and engaging in the requisite analysis required under relevant case ... and valued, the judge must apply the factors contained in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and equitably distribute the assets between the parties. Sculler v ...

docket:	a6302-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	46455

137 BRADLEY CONWAY v. NICHOL DuPONT -- rank: 555

... in that entity. In equitably distributing marital assets, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, a judge must decide what property is eligible for distribution ...

docket:	a4065-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	75560

138 W. BRUCE OVERBAY v. MARY ELLEN OVERBAY -- rank: 555

... of the savings plan balance. After considering the statutory factors, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, in light of the evidence, the trial judge determined there ...

docket:	A1818-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-03-18
status:	published
citation:	376 N.J. Super. 99 869 A.2d 435
Document Size:	39997

139 J.P. v. M.P. -- rank: 550

... of the expenses was $87,410 per year. Weighing the N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 statutory factors, the judge ordered an equal equitable distribution of ...

docket:	a0053-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31612

140 CARY TINFOW v. DEBORAH TINFOW -- rank: 547

... the parties. As such, and contrary to plaintiff's assertion, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, the statute addressing what factors courts should consider in equitably ...

docket:	a4749-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-06
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	66089

141 PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC v. BARTHOLOMEW MOMANYI -- rank: 544

... debts. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(h) and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(m). The trial judge reasoned Milka could not continue to ...

docket:	a2713-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45188

142 C.P v. E.P -- rank: 542

... Judge Walsh addressed equitable distribution. After reviewing the applicable statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, the judge found that there were two A-0061-18T1 ... N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23(a) to (b); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of divorce. We also affirm ...

docket:	a0061-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-11-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13965

143 MICHAEL KRISS v. RITA KRISS -- rank: 542

... in determining how the parties' assets should be equitably distributed. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The judge must also make 'specific findings of fact on ...

docket:	a3255-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59492

144 TIMOTHY B. VAN HORN v. LISA VAN HORN -- rank: 536

... 30, 2005, and December 9, 2005. We add the following. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 requires the court to consider various statutory factors in making ...

docket:	a3813-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	68494

145 AMY J. ROUBA v. DUANE ROUBA -- rank: 536

... after applying all of the factors governing equitable distribution. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1; Bursztyn v. Bursztyn , 379 N.J. Super. 385 , 398 (App ...

docket:	a4073-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40364

146 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4219-18.opn.html -- rank: 536

... was required to consider the statutory factors governing equitable distribution, N.J.S.A. 2A:34- 23.1, to resolve the marital debt and debt service reimbursement. Because ... to demonstrate that the MSA was invalid, unfair, or inequitable, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 is inapplicable. The MSA represented the parties' voluntary settlement of ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25698

147 SANDRA VILLEGAS v. JAMES VILLEGAS -- rank: 533

... many factors, when arriving at an equitable distribution decision. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(j). As to defendant's remaining point, the parties agree ...

docket:	a2516-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43105

148 JOHN A. VARGAS v. MARIA E. COLON -- rank: 533

... the judge reviewed the factors under the equitable distribution statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, and made the following findings. Plaintiff was sixty-five years ... a lump sum payment from plaintiff's pension. We agree. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 governs equitable distribution of marital assets. A marital asset 'is ... acquisition of income and property while the party was married.' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Thus, 'all property, regardless of its source, in which a ...

docket:	a0674-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19073

149 MILIJANA DROBNJAK v. DEJAN DROBNJAK -- rank: 525

... findings regarding each of the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. See Steneken v. Steneken, 367 N.J. Super. 427, 434 ...

docket:	a1285-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-04-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17650

150 MARIE MILLER v. ROBERT MILLER -- rank: 525

... property. In doing so, he considered the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Regarding the Cedar Run property, the judge reasoned the marital ... 205 (App. Div. 1977). Those criteria are set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, and in every case, the court must make specific factual findings with respect to all 16 factors. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. To be sure, any property owned by a husband or ... recognized each party's contribution to its acquisition and preservation. N.J.S.A. 2A: 34-23.1(i). In this regard, although no marital assets were used ...

docket:	a2605-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-04-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44946