Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

16 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a-51-15.opn.html -- rank: 818

... 100,961. It subjected that amount to equitable distribution under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, awarding thirty percent of that amount, or $30,288, to ... that the trial court improperly construed the equitable distribution statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, to authorize the distribution of only the portion of the ... trust. Thieme counters that the trial court correctly concluded that N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 authorizes equitable distribution based upon a marital relationship, and that ... court’s consideration as it divides the parties’ marital assets. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. 5 3 In January 2010 , the Legislature amended the Statute ... of the Closing Bonus, some of the factors identified in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(a) to –(p) may be relevant to the trial ... of a portion of the Closing Bonus on remand. See N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(a) to –(p). 1 This archive is a ...

docket:	A-51-15
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size:	108278

17 DAVID W. KINZLER v. LORI P TALARICO-KINZLER -- rank: 807

... parties after analysis of the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1." Genovese v. Genovese , 392 N.J. Super. 215 , 225-26 ... citing Rothman v. Rothman , 65 N.J. 219 , 232 (1974)); N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The analysis includes marital debts. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(m). Notably, David testified that he planned to pay the ... the debt, the trial court considered the applicable factors of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, all of which were supported by the evidence. The parties were the same age when married and divorced. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(b). The marriage was of intermediate length. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(a). The court meticulously addressed each party's vocational ...

docket:	a2468-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56897

18 A-0RALPH IRALDI v. LYNN IRALDI, n/k/a LYNN FRANCES CHONSKI May 11 2015 -- rank: 794

... distribution. Ralph also contends that the judge failed to apply N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 in making the equitable distribution allocation and abused his discretion ... were subject to equitable distribution. After considering the factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, the judge awarded Ralph a 55% interest and Lynn a ... 1990). Such property is not exempt for equitable distribution under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Rather, when property is acquired in contemplation of marriage and ... required to apply the fifteen statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. See Giovine v. Giovine , 284 N.J. Super. 3 , 29 ... assets, and any other factors deemed relevant by the court. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The end result must reflect that "the trial judge . . . appl[ied] all the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and distribute[d] the marital assets consistent with the ...

docket:	a1001-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44891

19 ALLEN S. GREENE v. VERONIQUE MAAS-GREENE -- rank: 783

... 20 37 distribution of the parties' marital retirement assets under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Defendant asserts the judge did not analyze the claims made ...

docket:	a3196-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-04
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	72865

20 NANCY G. SLUTSKY v. KENNETH J. SLUTSKY -- rank: 766

... N.J. Super. 557 , 567 (App. Div. 1986); see also N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(m) (requiring "debts and liabilities of the parties" to be ... not limited to, the sixteen statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Fashioning an equitable distribution of marital assets and debts requires ... courts must remain true to the legislative mandate expressed in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, which assures an ordered equitable distribution be "designed to advance ... This demands an examination of equitable factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The Legislature has mandated: "In every case . . . the court shall ... intrinsic value associated with any amount determined as individual goodwill. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(p); see also Dugan , supra , 92 N.J. at 435 ...

docket:	a5829-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-08
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101573

21 J.T.S. v. S.R -- rank: 761

... appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property. . . .' N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(i). Although the Legislature has not defined 'dissipation' of marital ...

docket:	a3309-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59849

22 DAVID ANDERSON v. MELISSA ANDERSON -- rank: 761

... but, rather, whether the judge considered the factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 in making the award. Here, the judge considered those factors ...

docket:	a0922-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50092

23 JOANN DALY v. PETER DALY -- rank: 758

... Div. 1978)). Under equitable distribution, the statutory factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, 'used in concert with the facts of each case,' inform ... father in equitable distribution. We disagree. A-1825-18T4 18 N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 provides the statutory factors to be considered in determining equitable ... Dissipation of marital assets must be considered in equitable distribution. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(i). Generally, the distributable marital estate will include assets diverted ...

docket:	a1825-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-12-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53454

24 ANDREW FLOCKHART v. KAREN FLOCKHART -- rank: 756

... Rothman v. Rothman, 65 N.J. 219, 232 (1974)). Under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1, courts are required to make 'findings of fact on the ...

docket:	a1578-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-05-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	81369

25 KRITHIGA SADEESHKUMAR v. SADEESHKUMAR VENUGOPAL -- rank: 750

... The dissipation of assets is a consideration in equitable distribution. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1(i); see also Kothari v. Kothari, 255 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a0434-23
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-02-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	36045

26 B.G v. E.G -- rank: 750

... all of the children.' The court considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 in making equitable distribution of the parties' marital property. It ... be made after analysis of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.' Sauro v. Sauro, 425 N.J. Super. 555, 572- 73 ... trial judge . . . appl[ied] all the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 and distribute[d] the marital assets consistent with the unique ...

docket:	a0830-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	63580

27 N.C v. D.C -- rank: 747

... the judge failed to consider the equitable distribution factors in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. We review an equitable distribution award for an abuse of ... failing to apply the equitable distribution factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 when redistributing the marital property. "[T]he goal of equitable ... the judge must consider the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. The judge gave detailed reasons for her findings as to ... Compare N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) with N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. III Husband contends the judge erred by awarding permanent alimony ...

docket:	a2449-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-03
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	40071

28 MARK S. RUDERMAN v. LOIS RUDERMAN -- rank: 745

... quoting Rothman v. Rothman , 65 N.J. 219 , 229 (1974)). N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 enumerates sixteen factors that a court must consider in making ... and Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.] The process of equitably distributing marital property is not a ...

docket:	a4949-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70292

29 MARK S. RUDERMAN v. LOIS RUDERMAN -- rank: 745

... quoting Rothman v. Rothman , 65 N.J. 219 , 229 (1974)). N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1 enumerates sixteen factors that a court must consider in making ... and Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.] The process of equitably distributing marital property is not a ...

docket:	a2355-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	72492

30 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5362-17.opn.html -- rank: 742

... achieved by applying a series of factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. A-5362-17T4 17 Thus, the court must consider, but ... not limited to, the sixteen statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1. Carr v. Carr, 120 N.J. 336, 348 (1990). These ... p) Any other factors which the court may deem relevant. [N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23.1.] Thus, one factor the court considers when making an equitable ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	57668