Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2c:25-29")   1 to 15 of 625 results. Run time: 0.805 seconds | Search time: 0.798 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 42 Next 15
1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. W.C. -- rank: 1000
... possessing weapons or holding a firearms purchaser identification card under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) for two years following entry of a final restraining ... State argued only that it was entitled to forfeiture because N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) barred the return of defendant's weapons for the ... N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21(d)(3) because N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)'s two-year bar disqualified defendant from possessing or ... S.A. 2C:58-3(c)(5). 6 We recognize N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) provides that restraining orders issued under the PDVA shall ... improvidently granted. The court rejected the State's argument, finding N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) did not bar the return of defendant's weapons ... BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT IS BARRED FROM POSSESSING ANY WEAPONS UNDER N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(b)]. II. The interpretation of a statute presents a ...
docket: a0800-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-06-24
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 52495
2 C.R. v. M. T. \t -- rank: 852
... 2C:14-16(a) -- whereas the PDVA lists six, see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The Legislature could have duplicated the second factor for ... he existence of immediate danger to person or property,” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2) -- in SASPA, but it did not. In addition ... filing of the application for a TRO or TPO. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a); N.J.S.A. 2C:14-16(a). Both ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (emphasis added).] Four of the six PDVA factors could ... he existence of immediate danger to person or property,” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2). In addition, the consequences to a defendant of ... prohibit the defendant from purchasing, owning, or possessing any weapons. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). An FRO can then include nineteen additional forms ...
docket: a_47_22
court: supreme
decided: 2024-04-19
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 136563
3 N.G v. R.T -- rank: 847
... prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127. The factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) include '[t]he previous history of domestic violence between ... fear of defendant and the need for a restraining order. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Defendant's arguments to the contrary are wholly unpersuasive ...
docket: a1425-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-02-28
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53633
4 M.S. v. D.H -- rank: 740
... AVAILABLE EVIDENCE DISCLOSED TO EXIST DURING THE FRO HEARING, VIOLATED [N.J.S.A.] . . . 2C:25-29 AND NECESSITATES RELIEF FROM THE FRO. A-1548-18T2 16 ... been violated.' Ibid. (first and second alterations in original) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)). Next, we consider defendant's challenge to the ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6)], to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6).] Applying these principles, the ...
docket: a1548-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-25
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 47069
5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. D.G.M. -- rank: 740
... regularly by the victim or other family or household members." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(6). And the Act authorizes restraints on various forms ... be likely to cause annoyance or alarm to the victim." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7). Considering this broad grant of authority, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) (directing that courts are empowered to "grant any relief ... Joan than a particular amount of feet. We also assume N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) allows our courts to specifically prohibit a defendant from ... meanings. In this context, we assume the Legislature in enacting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7) – and the Family judge in crafting the ... type of conduct the Legislature had in mind when enacting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7). Cf. , State v. J.T. , 294 N. ...
docket: a5783-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-03-20
status: published
citation: 439 N.J.Super. 630 110 A.3d 978
Document Size: 40121
6 M.S. v. Millburn Police Department, et al. -- rank: 737
... 1997. The court also found inapplicable the 2004 enactment of N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b), which “bar[s] the defendant from receiving or ... order a specific provision prohibiting plaintiff from possessing a firearm, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). Ibid. No such provision was placed in the restraining ... court had the discretion to include such a bar under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(16)). Because a hearing was never conducted, whether the ... if . . . .” (Emphasis added). 13 3 Effective January 14 , 2004, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) required that domestic violence restraining orders include a bar ...
docket: a-80-08
court:
decided: 2008-12-23
status:
citation: 197 N.J. 216
Document Size: 82217
7 T.L. v. J.D.G -- rank: 727
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 (a)(4), is one of the six factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 a court may consider, that factor, like '[t]he financial circumstances of the plaintiff and defendant,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(3), is 'relevant only to the fashioning of a ... include: barring a defendant from having contact with his children, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(3)(b), or suspending his custodial rights to his children, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11), requiring him to undergo a psychiatric evaluation, ...
docket: a1791-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-02-26
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 74693
8 E.L.C v. D.M.F -- rank: 722
... FRO was necessary after applying the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). Defendant raises numerous contentions on appeal ... addressed the non-exhaustive list of factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). Judge Fikry thereupon issued the FRO ... an act of domestic violence was committed by that person.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). An FRO may be issued if two criteria are ... evidence. S.D., 415 N.J. Super. at 431 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Under the preponderance standard, 'a litigant must establish that ... reconvened the parties and rendered his decision on the record. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) provides in pertinent part that '[a] hearing shall be ... findings regarding the history of domestic violence between the parties. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) provides that the court in determining whether ...
docket: a3033-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-10-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61358
9 M.M.-C. v. I.I. -- rank: 717
... FRO, 5 imposed a civil penalty of $250 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 and ordered defendant into a Batterers Intervention Program. This appeal ... N.J.S.A. 2C:25-28(f)-(j). Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, following a hearing, the judge may, among other relief, issue ... the victim to domestic violence, as defined in [the] act." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). In determining whether to issue a FRO under the ... based upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Silver , supra , 387 N.J. Super. at 127 ... and defendant; [and] [t]he best interests of the victim[.] [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] In this case, the numerous prior acts of domestic ... that restraints were necessary because all the factors cited in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) were not found by the judge. Defendant's ...
docket: a2276-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50446
10 M.M.-C. v. I.I. -- rank: 717
... FRO, 5 imposed a civil penalty of $250 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 and ordered defendant into a Batterers Intervention Program. This appeal ... N.J.S.A. 2C:25-28(f)-(j). Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, following a hearing, the judge may, among other relief, issue ... the victim to domestic violence, as defined in [the] act." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). In determining whether to issue a FRO under the ... based upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Silver , supra , 387 N.J. Super. at 127 ... and defendant; [and] [t]he best interests of the victim[.] [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] In this case, the numerous prior acts of domestic ... that restraints were necessary because all the factors cited in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) were not found by the judge. Defendant's ...
docket: a2276-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 50457
11 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4395-19.opn.html -- rank: 707
... reaching that determination, she considered the six factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). She first found that there was ... in counsel fees and costs as compensatory damages pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). This appeal followed. Our review of a Family ... 19(a), it must then consider the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6)4 to determine whether an FRO ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6).] A-4395-19 15 Super. at ... look to other relevant factors not included in the statute. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); N.T.B. v. D.D.B., 442 ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 36046
12 A.P.V v. G.T -- rank: 707
... of stalking. Also in August 2021, Gina moved pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) to dissolve the FRO obtained by Adam. Gina certified ... transcript of the April 2021 FRO hearing, as required under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). The judge stated that although another judge issued the ... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). A-0549-21 9 If a plaintiff has ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Having ... different from those relied upon by the trial court').3 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) provides that an FRO may be dissolved or ...
docket: a0549-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-01-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30142
13 B.L.D v. C.M.C -- rank: 702
... the relationship and to give context to otherwise ambiguous behavior. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); J.D., 207 N.J. at 479. Trial ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(]a[)](1) to - 29[(]a[)](6), to protect the victim ... history, if any, of domestic violence between the parties, see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(]a[)](1), or to be certain of the relevant facts ...
docket: a0700-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-01-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 57772
14 A.M v. J.P.M -- rank: 702
... instead of considering the statutory factors the Legislature established in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). Specifically, the judge declared 'the plaintiff ... finding, 'upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- -29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6),' that a restraining order ... is not among the six factors the Legislature included in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6). 5 5 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) provides in part: A-0900-20 12 The only ... not done here. Instead of focusing on the factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6) and weighing the parties' entire relationship ... is in immediate danger from the defendant. The factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6) are a non-exclusive list ...
docket: a0900-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-09-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40267
15 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. E.C. -- rank: 700
... with the victim or members of the victim's family, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(6), (7); modify parenting time, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(3);restrict the right to purchase or possess firearms, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b); enjoin use of a residence, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(2); require completion of various counseling programs, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(5); and impose civil penalties "of at least $50, but not to exceed $500[,]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29.1. However, . . . these provisions are designed to protect a ...
docket: a5204-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28421
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 42 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!