Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

106 A.M.I. v. A.I. -- rank: 592

... if defendant claims self-defense or goading by plaintiff. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) (which states that the court "shall consider . . . [t ...

docket:	a2766-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23502

107 C.F.A v. B.A.A -- rank: 590

... based on an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6).] Because not every factor ... lives or works. Although the judge need not incorporate every N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) factor into his opinion, per Rule 1:7- 4 ...

docket:	a0169-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-09-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20315

108 E.A.M.,1 v. M.S.M -- rank: 587

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 127. The trial judge applied none of the factors of N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) and made no findings whatsoever about the need of ... is not one of the enumerated factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) to be considered by a court in issuing an ...

docket:	a1527-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-02-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21655

109 L.D., JR v. S.L.D. -- rank: 587

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). The judge is also required to consider 'any past ... whether a restraining order is necessary to protect the plaintiff. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); see also D.M.R. v. M.K ... a terroristic threat. See 387 N.J. Super. at 125; N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). In an oral decision issued on September 20, 2022 ... at 126-27. The judge appropriately considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (b)(6) and found defendant's actions ... a legitimate fear based on defendant's escalating actions. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). The judge's findings are supported by A ...

docket:	a0689-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21316

110 J.D. v. M.D.F. -- rank: 587

... of restraints is “necessary” to protect plaintiff from harm. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. That inquiry serves to ensure that the protective purposes of ...

docket:	a-115-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-07-28
status:
citation:
Document Size:	96681

111 J.D. v. V.D. -- rank: 585

... award of $16,022.50 in counsel fees, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). A supporting 17 A-2897-14T3 certification of ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... N.J. Super. 502, 507 (App. Div. 2007); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). '[T]o hold otherwise would create a chilling ...

docket:	a2897-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	89188

112 E.J.P.S v. R.A.K -- rank: 585

... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Applying these standards, we discern no basis for disturbing ... demonstrating a previous history of domestic violence between the parties, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); and the fact that, under the circumstances, the ... of a FRO was undoubtedly in plaintiff's best interests, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(4). Thus, it was self-evident that a FRO ...

docket:	a1467-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16654

113 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1972-21.opn.html -- rank: 585

... for an FRO pursuant to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), the judge was persuaded plaintiff demonstrated an FRO was ... March 4, 2022, the judge granted plaintiff's application. Citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29(b)(4), the judge found domestic violence victims 'are entitled ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). In those cases where 'the risk of harm ... fees and costs incurred by a victim of domestic violence. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4). Under the PDVA, a judge may enter an ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24765

114 M.B. VS. T.B. -- rank: 585

... limited to consideration of only those factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), as it is instructed to weigh: A-2795-22 ... at 127. The trial court properly weighed all of the N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) factors, as well as M.B.'s fear of ... M.B. that J.B. was fearful of T.B. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) sets forth that the Family Part 'shall grant any ... under the FRO entered in favor of M.B. Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7), the trial court may issue a FRO forbidding ... statutorily prohibits contact with the victim through a third- party. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7). Here, there was no evidence presented that any ...

docket:	a2795-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-05-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38448

115 A.N. v. W.D. -- rank: 585

... FRO. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19(a)(13); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(1), (6)-(7). The offense of harassment at issue ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] Although the court is not required to incorporate all ...

docket:	a0493-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24206

116 S.K.E v. C.J.C -- rank: 582

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... further abuse." Id. at 127. The factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) are: (1) The previous ...

docket:	a3561-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27068

117 A.P. v. J.D. -- rank: 582

... is made that an act of domestic violence was committed." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also R. 5:7A(d). Domestic violence occurs ... court that "'relief is necessary to prevent further abuse'" ((quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Although this determination "is most often perfunctory and self ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)-(6), to protect the victim from an immediate ... and the "best interests of the victim and any child." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)-(2), (4). Here, the trial judge explained that ...

docket:	a1835-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37216

118 M.D. v. C.W -- rank: 582

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). A finding of harassment requires proof that the ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the [factors] set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] A-3249-19 13 Here, the judge properly considered ... violence and addressed the six statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Based upon the substantial credible evidence in the record ...

docket:	a3249-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26478

119 E.S.W. VS. D.A.P. -- rank: 580

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to - 29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(b)); see also J.D., 207 N.J. at 476 ... is a presumption of custody to the non-abusive parent, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11), custody to the non-abusive parent is not automatic, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b), and may be rebutted. Moreover, an FV judge may ...

docket:	a2531-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-07-24
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13554

120 M.J.S.,1 v. C.R.A.S -- rank: 577

... A-0698-22 7 has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). The judge is also required to consider 'any past ... whether a restraining order is necessary to protect the plaintiff. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); see also D.M.R. v. M.K ...

docket:	a0698-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-12-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22826