Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

136 T.M. v. R.M.W. -- rank: 567

... M.D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Factors to be considered include: (1) [t]he previous ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child. . . . [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) permits the introduction of evidence of the 'previous history ... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Here, plaintiff alleges defendant committed the predicate acts ...

docket:	fv-15-0506-18
court:
decided:	2017-09-28
status:
citation:	456 N.J.Super. 446 195 A.3d 152
Document Size:	40125

137 L.S. v. J.P. -- rank: 567

... Kunen , 313 N.J. Super. 600 , 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... 281 N.J. Super. 243 , 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)); see also Cesare , supra , 154 N.J. at 402 ...

docket:	a2149-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26762

138 B.J.C. VS. K.H. -- rank: 567

... 2006), and did not properly analyze the statutory factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). We conclude the trial court failed ... 25- - 19[(a)] has occurred.' Id. at 125; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (providing that an FRO may only be granted 'after ... an evaluation of the fact[or]s set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... the trial court failed to properly analyze the factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). The trial court did not consider ... of its review of the non-exhaustive factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. A-2668-22 8 The order denying plaintiff's application ...

docket:	a2668-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-07-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16690

139 M.W v. M.B.W -- rank: 565

... V. SILVER ANALYSIS BY NOT CONSIDERING ALL THE FACTORS OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) THROUGH (6) AND BY CONSIDERING EVIDENCE NOT IN ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- - 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] Here ...

docket:	a1105-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20652

140 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1358-19.opn.html -- rank: 565

... and (2) failed to evaluate all of the factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) in determining whether an FRO was necessary to prevent ... the factors relevant to the issuance of an FRO in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), as required by Silver v. Silver ... did not explicitly review all six factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). However, based on the evidence presented ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2), (4), and (6). The record shows the ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	31216

141 L.M v. L.J.L -- rank: 565

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... violence between the [parties], including threats, harassment and physical abuse,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), and '[t]he best interests of the victim[,]' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(4). Governed by these principles, we address defendant's ...

docket:	a0477-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26925

142 D.M.R. v. M.K.G., -- rank: 565

... necessary, the judge must evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) and, applying those factors ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. 1995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Here, the judge found an FRO was necessary to ...

docket:	a4085-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-05-11
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37070

143 S.S v. M.J.C -- rank: 565

... Kunen, 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1). Second, if a predicate offense is proven, the judge must consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) to determine whether a ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). '[N]ot only may one sufficiently egregious action constitute ... basis to disturb plaintiff's counsel fee award. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4), a judge may issue '[a]n order requiring ...

docket:	a2635-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-03-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22050

144 C.H v. R.J.O -- rank: 565

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 1973). Nonetheless, we add the following brief remarks. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4), a judge may issue '[a]n order requiring ... of attorneys' fees was not an abuse of discretion. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4); McGowan, 391 N.J. Super. at 508. Affirmed ...

docket:	a1058-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24721

145 M.H. v. V.H. -- rank: 562

... must consider the protection of "the victim and any child." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The judge determined an FRO was necessary under Silver ... violence between the parties and the existence of immediate danger. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Peranio , supra , 280 N.J. Super. at ...

docket:	a4346-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19300

146 N.I v. L.M -- rank: 562

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to - 29[(a)](6), to protect the A ... and 'the best interests of the victim and any child.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2) and (3). Under N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a3516-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16863

147 L.M.J v. D.V.O -- rank: 560

... N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) (instructing courts to consider the parties' previous history ... an evaluation of the fact[or]s set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... 281 N.J. Super. 243, 248 (App. Div. l995) (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(a)); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 402. Harassment ...

docket:	a2876-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27716

148 T.M.S. v. W.C.P. -- rank: 560

... 29, 2006. Defendant moved to vacate the FRO pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) and Carfagno v. Carfagno , 288 N.J. Super. 424 ... a court may vacate an FRO upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). Carfagno establishes eleven factors a court must weigh to ... defendant makes a request to dismiss an FRO pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), the manual provides "[t]he court shall make reasonable ... adjudicated within ten days of filing of the complaint . See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Rather, we rely on N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) which provides: Upon good cause shown, any final order ...

docket:	a4900-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-05
status:	published
citation:	450 N.J.Super. 499 163 A.3d 929
Document Size:	38727

149 C.R.D. v. C.S -- rank: 560

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). If the court finds the defendant committed a predicate ... is necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors included in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), to protect the victim from an ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2), and (4). A-0826-20 11 In ... terse analysis was any reference to the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Indeed, the judge made no findings concerning the parties' previous history of domestic violence, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), notwithstanding plaintiff's allegation that defendant assaulted him ...

docket:	a0826-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23654

150 M.D.G. v. J.G. -- rank: 560

... whether there exists immediate danger to person or property. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2). . . . . The second inquiry, upon a finding ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... or to prevent further abuse." Id. at 127; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). Here, the judge acknowledged that his determination of the ... required protection from "immediate danger or to prevent further abuse." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b). We exercise broad review in considering "the trial judge ...

docket:	a4940-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30355