Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

31 R.G. v. R.G. -- rank: 657

... the plaintiff and defendant , including threats, harassment and physical abuse[.]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) (emphasis added). Also admissible is "[t]he existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(6). However, in this matter, the admission of evidence ... State v. Marrero , 148 N.J. 469 , 483 (1997). Although N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) permits the introduction of evidence of the "previous ... evidence regarding a defendant's past altercations with others. Rather, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (6), limits the trial court's consideration ... between defendant and defendant's son was not permitted by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Nor was it offered to be used for ... whether immediate danger to the person or property is present. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2). This requirement reflects the reality ...

docket:	a0945-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-14
status:	published
citation:	449 N.J.Super. 208 156 A.3d 1074
Document Size:	62581

32 J.R.M v. S.A.M -- rank: 657

... 19(a), it must then consider the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6),3 to determine whether an FRO ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6).] A-5938-17T1 11 'to protect ... whether immediate danger to the person or property is present. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2). This requirement reflects the reality that ... by both the statute and Silver. See ibid.; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2) (identifying '[t]he existence of immediate danger to ...

docket:	a5938-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29478

33 B.A.F. v. H.D.N -- rank: 657

... and self-evident,' and subsequently addressed the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6), finding plaintiff needed an FRO to ... one or more of the predicate acts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125. Next, the court evaluates the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -(6) and determines whether an FRO is ... Superior Court . . . in the county where the [TRO was] ordered[.]' [. . . .]' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (emphasis added). The TRO 'shall remain in effect until ... court failed to consider all relevant factors under Silver and N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). He maintains an FRO was not warranted because he ... he drinks. The judge properly considered the statutory factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) and found that an FRO was in the ...

docket:	a0956-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30409

34 K.S. v. S.H -- rank: 655

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Harassment, as defined by N.J.S.A. 2C ... is necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors included in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ... necessary, the judge must evaluate the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to - 29(a)(6)'). Those factors are: (1 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A 2C:25-29(a).] 'A history of domestic violence may serve to give ...

docket:	a0650-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30713

35 N.T.B. v. D.D.B. -- rank: 655

... 25-19[(a)] has occurred.' Id. at 125; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (providing that an FRO may only be granted 'after ... was committed'); R. 5:7A(d) (mirroring the language of N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). However, the occurrence of a predicate act does not ... court that ''relief is necessary to prevent further abuse'' (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b))). Criminal mischief, as defined by N.J.S.A ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)(1)-(6)], to protect the victim from an immediate ... and the 'best interests of the victim and any child.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1)-(2), (4). Here, the judge found defendant committed ...

docket:	a4542-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-09-09
status:	published
citation:	442 N.J.Super. 205 121 A.3d 910
Document Size:	40517

36 K.E.M v. S.R.A -- rank: 655

... done by 'an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to - 29(a)(6).' J.D., 207 N ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a).] '[W]hether the victim fears the defendant' is an ... abuse.' Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b) (stating 'the court shall grant any relief necessary to ... findings, and an evaluation of applicable factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), as required by prong ...

docket:	a3563-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	58618

37 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5220-18.opn.html -- rank: 655

... the [c]ourt considers the factors that are enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) and perhaps most importantly . . . the previous history of domestic ... 19(a), it must then consider the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6) 3 to determine whether an FRO ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6).] A-5220-18T1 16 228. Although ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... look to other relevant factors not included in the statute. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); N.T.B., 442 N.J. Super. at 223 ... the person or property is present. A-5220-18T1 17 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2). This requirement reflects the reality ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35259

38 C.B v. K.S -- rank: 655

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(b) which states, '[i]n proceedings in which complaints for ... finding that 'relief is necessary to prevent further abuse.'') (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). Among the factors a judge should consider under the ... the plaintiff and defendant, including threats, harassment and physical abuse.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Mindful of these standards, we are satisfied the ... 127. Moreover, she made no findings regarding the factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), such as '[t]he existence of immediate danger to ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child,' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2) and (4), notwithstanding the facts elicited during ...

docket:	a1526-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-12-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16900

39 M.A.D v. B.L.D -- rank: 652

... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to 29(a)(6), 8 to 8 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 provides in part: The court shall consider but not be ... although the judge did not identify each statutory factor under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), it is evident she considered them, either explicitly or ... for an FRO. A-0122-21 25 For example, regarding N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), the judge extensively commented on the prior history ... in plaintiff's car several years ago. Also, consistent with N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(2), the judge implicitly addressed whether an immediate danger ... FRO in plaintiff's favor. A-0122-21 26 Regarding N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(3), (4), and (5), the judge was aware ...

docket:	a0122-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-05
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50091

40 H.C.F. v. J.T.B. -- rank: 652

... if the court determines "by a preponderance of the evidence[,]" N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), that the defendant has committed an act of ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. [2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6)], to protect the victim ... issue an order . . . awarding temporary custody of a minor child." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11). When awarding temporary custody, the PDVA requires that ... by requiring or encouraging contact between the plaintiff and defendant." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(3). Here, the court presumed that granting plaintiff temporary ...

docket:	a5618-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38091

41 Z.F v. C.O. -- rank: 650

... based on an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Silver, 387 N.J. Super. at 127 (citing A-0276-19T3 5 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); see also J.D. v. M.D.F., 207 ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6).] Because not every factor ... N.J. Super. at 126-27. Accordingly, it adopted the N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) factors to ensure one would issue only if a ... 2017 incident established a history of defendant's physical abuse, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(1). Separately, the trial judge found defendant physically assaulted plaintiff ... injuries clearly establish the existence of immediate danger to plaintiff, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(2). We conclude that the need for an FRO ...

docket:	a0276-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15936

42 G.M v. C.V. -- rank: 645

... the FRO. In March 2016, defendant made application pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) to dissolve the FRO, alleging a 'substantial change of ... The court based its ruling on the plain language in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), which requires a 'complete record of the hearing' before ... M.D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). A final restraining order under the Act can be ... v. W.C.P., 450 N.J. Super. at 502. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) provides, Upon good cause shown, any final order may ... the hearing or hearings on which the order was based. [N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d).] The party asking to modify or dissolve the FRO ... only denies her a right the Legislature expressly provided in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), but permanently bars her from obtaining any relief, ...

docket:	a4820-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-17
status:	published
citation:	453 N.J.Super. 1 179 A.3d 413
Document Size:	68806

43 J.B v. D.B -- rank: 645

... committed, a court may consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), but it does not necessarily have to incorporate all ... Depos , 307 N.J. Super. 396, 399 (Ch. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Neither the DVA nor Rule 5:7A authorizes the ... with the domestic violence case. Again, we disagree. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4), as part of the award for relief in ... own provision for moving to dissolve a FRO. According to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), "[u]pon good cause shown, any final order may ... trial court that he was not moving for relief under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). He asserted instead that the oppression and inequity of ...

docket:	a2584-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47197

44 J.B v. D.B -- rank: 645

... committed, a court may consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), but it does not necessarily have to incorporate all ... Depos , 307 N.J. Super. 396, 399 (Ch. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Neither the DVA nor Rule 5:7A authorizes the ... with the domestic violence case. Again, we disagree. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(4), as part of the award for relief in ... own provision for moving to dissolve a FRO. According to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d), "[u]pon good cause shown, any final order may ... trial court that he was not moving for relief under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). He asserted instead that the oppression and inequity of ...

docket:	a0947-07
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47197

45 VIVIAN CRESPO v. ANIBAL CRESPO -- rank: 645

... to or from an authorized place of duty." Ibid. 11 N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 permits judges to include provisions in FROs that "bar the ...

docket:	a0202-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-06-18
status:	published
citation:	408 N.J.Super. 25 972 A.2d 1169
Document Size:	67231