Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

361 E.B v. A.B -- rank: 472

... with an application to dissolve a final restraining order under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d).' Id. at 434. A-3241-20 6 The [c ... a court may vacate an FRO upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). Carfagno established eleven factors a court must weigh to ... the criminal proceeding arising out of the same incident. See N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Defendant has thus failed to show that the trial ...

docket:	a3241-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29116

362 M.L. v. P.K.T. -- rank: 472

... court also must determine, by considering the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), whether a FRO is ...

docket:	a3691-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-01
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21040

363 M.W. v. S.L. -- rank: 472

... must consider whether the moving party has established "good cause." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d); 5 Kanaszka v. Kunen , 313 N.J. Super. 600 ... the hearing or hearings on which the order was based." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). The record does not clearly indicate that Saul followed ...

docket:	a0481-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16652

364 N.T v. A.T -- rank: 470

... raises the following arguments for our consideration: Point One : Under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) the court may dissolve or modify a final restraining ... inadequate decision considering the motion late for consideration while ignoring N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d) and [ Carfagno v. Carfagno ], 288 [ N.J. Super. ] 424 ...

docket:	a4412-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12027

365 S.B v. D.L -- rank: 470

... 2C:25-19(a) has occurred.' Id. at 125 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Second, the judge must determine whether a restraining order ... whether a restraining order is necessary to protect the plaintiff. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1); see also D.M.R. v. M.K ...

docket:	a0652-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20879

366 I.M v. E.S.-P -- rank: 470

... of the factors set A-0457-20 5 forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... thorough review of the six non-exhaustive factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29, which a court shall consider in determining whether a final ...

docket:	a0457-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-03-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14325

367 O.A. v. J.V. -- rank: 467

... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a); see also Cesare, 154 N.J. at 401.] The ...

docket:	a0326-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38488

368 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5559-17.opn.html -- rank: 467

... should consider the six factors set forth in the PDVA, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). 1 Silver, 387 N.J. Super ... existence of a verifiable order of protection from another jurisdiction.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(A)(1) to (6). A-5559-17T2 8 412 N ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17860

369 J.M.M. v. S.A.S. -- rank: 467

... M.D.F. , 207 N.J. 458, 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). It is well established that commission of one of ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. [2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6)], to protect the victim ...

docket:	a5213-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19698

370 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3388-19.opn.html -- rank: 467

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Second, if the court finds a plaintiff has ... which involves an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6). Silver, 387 N.J ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	13593

371 R.A.M., III v. R.O. -- rank: 465

... D.F., 207 N.J. 458, 475-76 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)) (an FRO should not be issued without a finding ...

docket:	a3626-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17295

372 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0333-20.opn.html -- rank: 465

... 313 N.J. Super. 600, 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Second, if the court finds a plaintiff has ... which involves an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6). Silver, 387 N.J ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	15010

373 J.L v. A.D -- rank: 462

... that the defendant has committed an act of domestic violence. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(6). The term "domestic violence" is defined in N ... App. Div. 1999)). The court must evaluate the factors in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6) and determine whether a ...

docket:	a2267-14
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	25510

374 L.S. v. P.S. -- rank: 460

... 25-19 [(a)] has occurred." Id. at 125; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) (providing that an FRO may only be granted "after ... finding that "relief is necessary to prevent further abuse" (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b))). I. Harassment The trial judge here found that defendant ...

docket:	a4410-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22453

375 C.G v. M.G -- rank: 460

... 313 N.J. Super. 600 , 607 (App. Div. 1998); see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). If a predicate offense is proven, the judge ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6),   to protect the victim ...

docket:	a1165-14
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	16322