Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2c:25-29")   391 to 405 of 625 results. Run time: 0.729 seconds | Search time: 0.722 seconds    
 Page:1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 42 Previous 15 Next 15
391 E.W. W.M-H. -- rank: 450
... 27. The court shall now address the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) seriatim. As for any previous history of domestic violence ...
docket: FV-07-2446-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2026-08-04
status:
citation:
Document Size: 28288
392 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3026-19.opn.html -- rank: 450
... order is necessary, after evaluating the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a), 'to protect the victim from an immediate danger or to prevent further abuse.' Id. at 127 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29(b)). A-3026-19 6 Harassment, as defined by N ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 14942
393 C.L v. J.C. -- rank: 450
... N.J. Super. 47 , 54 (App. Div. l995); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). Here, though not referencing any of the statutes, the ... for the abuser to support the victim's living expenses, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(2) and (8), if the court finds the defendant ...
docket: a6296-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-18
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28291
394 J.S v. J.D.Y. -- rank: 447
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ... second inquiry,' we examine the record in light of the N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a) factors, and it is clear: plaintiff testified that she ... of its review of the non-exhaustive factors listed in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29. We find defendant's lack of knowledge as to plaintiff ...
docket: a1477-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-03-31
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12201
395 C.J. v. D.K. -- rank: 447
... ambiguous behavior. J.D. , supra , 207 N.J. at 478; N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1). Trial courts can consider evidence of "a defendant ... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a2278-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-11-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16775
396 D.L. v. S.L. -- rank: 447
... M.D.F. , 207 N.J. 458 , 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). We discern no error by the court in its ... t]he best interests of the victim and any child." N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), (2) and (4). We defer to the Family ...
docket: a1177-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-07-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29061
397 T.M.H v. L.J.H -- rank: 447
... an act of domestic violence was committed by that person.' N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). An FRO may be issued if two criteria are ... evidence. S.D., 415 N.J. Super. at 431 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)). Under a preponderance standard, ''a litigant must establish that ...
docket: a0770-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-01-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21307
398 L.P. v. R.B. -- rank: 447
... to dissolve or modify a FRO upon good cause shown. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(d). Here, defendant argues good cause exists because after a ... proof for obtaining a FRO is preponderance of the evidence. N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a). The Family Part judge correctly determined it was not ...
docket: a3989-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-12-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28048
399 N.F v. E.F -- rank: 447
... consider the previous history, if any, of domestic violence, see N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) or to be certain of the relevant facts ... based upon the evaluation of the facts set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to (6). The judge's findings here were ...
docket: a2655-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-03-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36050
400 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5378-18.opn.html -- rank: 447
... Judge Burke properly analyzed the appropriate factors and specifically considered N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1), i.e., the parties' previous history of domestic ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 14680
401 S.M.B v. M.F.B -- rank: 445
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a0731-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22664
402 S.B.D v. S.S -- rank: 445
... M.D.F. , 207 N.J. 458 , 476 (2011) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)); L.M.F. v. J.A.F., Jr. , 421 ... present." Corrente , supra , 281 N.J. Super. at 248 (citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) and (2)); Peranio , supra , 280 N.J. Super ...
docket: a2299-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-11-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20048
403 S.M.M v. J.M.P. -- rank: 445
... of prohibited conduct contemplated by the Legislature. Ibid; see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(7) (order restraining defendant from contacting a domestic violence ...
docket: a2300-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-03-04
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 29842
404 L.B.I v. W.F.A.-Y. -- rank: 442
... necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25- 29[(a)](1) to -29[(a)](6), to protect the victim ...
docket: a3579-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-08-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23526
405 J.C. v. J.M. -- rank: 442
... THE FILING OF THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 a, CAUSING UNDUE BURDEN FOR THE DEFENDANT AND, THEREFORE, THE ... DEFENDANT IN MORE THAN CASUAL TERMS, AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 a (1), PLACING THE DEFENDANT AT A DISADVANTAGE IN BEHAVIORAL ... DISMISSED OR REHEARD. IV. THERE IS A POSSIBLE VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 d, WHEREAS THE ORIGINAL JUDGE, OR A JUDGE WHO HAD ...
docket: A1178-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-07-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 39870
 Page:1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 42 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!